Ключевые слова

0536-1036

Известия высших учебных заведений. Лесной журнал

Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal)

ФГАОУ ВО «Северный (Арктический) федеральный университет имени М.В. Ломоносова»

10.37482/0536-1036-2026-2-9-27

https://journals.narfu.ru/index.php/fj/article/view/2563

Лесное хозяйство

FORESTRY

Управление агролесоводством Репонг Дамар в провинции Лампунг (Индонезия)

Management of Repong Damar Agroforestry in Lampung Province (Indonesia)

Февриано

Индра Гумай

Февриано

Индра Гумай

Febryano

Indra Gumay

indra.gumay@fp.unila.ac.id

0000-0001-7242-656X

AAW-4454-2021

Вибово

Новита

Вибово

Новита

Wibowo

Novita

wibowonovita2002@gmail.com

0009-0000-1036-8798

OGP-1201-2025,

Харьянто

Сугенг Прайитно

Харьянто

Сугенг Прайитно

Harianto

Sugeng Prayitno

sugeng.prayitno@fp.unila.ac.id

0000-0002-9152-3880

Деви

Байна Сари

Деви

Байна Сари

Dewi

Bainah Sari

bainah.saridewi@fp.unila.ac.id

0009-0008-0638-1138

Университет Лампунга, факультет лесного хозяйства (г. Бандар-Лампунг, провинция Лампунг, Индонезия) Universitas Lampung, Department of Forestry (Bandar Lampung, Indonesia)

15 04 2026

2026

2 9 27 07 07 2025 01 10 2025 28 09 2025

2026

Февриано И.Г., Вибово Н., Харьянто С.П., Деви Б.С.

Febryano I.G., Wibowo N., Harianto S.P., Dewi B.S.

CC BY 4.0

https://journals.narfu.ru/index.php/fj/article/view/2563

Управление земельными и лесными ресурсами играет важную роль в устойчивом развитии провинций Индонезии. Целью исследования является анализ управления лесами на уровне общин – агролесомелиоративная система Репонг Дамар. В основе работы лежат данные, полученные путем визуальных наблюдений, углубленных опросов и анкетирования, а также изучения документации и архивных материалов. Собранные материалы проанализированы для определения роли сообщества в управлении лесами в соответствии с принципами агролесоводства по системе Репонг Дамар. Результаты показывают, что Репонг Дамар – это программа, направленная на обеспечение социально-экономических выгод для вовлеченных в управление сообществ. Государственная политика, как на центральном, так и на региональном уровнях, считается неэффективной в плане сохранения агролесомелиорации Репонг Дамар. Кроме того, сберечь агролесомелиорацию Репонг Дамар также можно путем превращения местности в объект культурного туризма. Культурные ценности следует интегрировать в законы и нормативные акты путем принятия соответствующих правовых принципов, норм и институтов, которые важны для достижения устойчивости и справедливости контроля лесов общинами. Это гарантирует сохранение культурной самобытности сообщества и передачу ее будущим поколениям. Дальнейшие исследования могут быть направлены на изучение политики сохранения культурных ценностей при управлении агролесомелиорацией Репонг Дамар в связи с проблемой изменения климата.

Community culture in land management plays a vital role in sustainable development and the preservation of traditional agroforestry systems. This study aims to analyze the role of community culture in the management of Repong Damar agroforestry within the framework of community-based forest management in Lampung Province, Indonesia. A qualitative research approach was adopted, utilizing data obtained through participatory observations, in-depth interviews with key stakeholders, and comprehensive documentation studies. The results demonstrate that while community-based forest management programs aim to provide socio-economic benefits, their success is inextricably linked to the evolving cultural identity and traditional practices of the local community. Current government policies at both central and regional levels are perceived as ineffective in ensuring the long-term preservation of Repong Damar agroforestry systems. Consequently, the study suggests that the Regency Government of Pesisir Barat should implement dedicated cultural preservation policies, including the promotion of cultural tourism, to safeguard these unique landscapes. Integrating traditional legal principles, norms, and indigenous institutions into formal regulations is essential for developing a truly sustainable and equitable management model. Such integration ensures that cultural identity remains preserved for future generations while maintaining the ecological balance of the forest. This study concludes that the cultural values of the community are indispensable for the resilience of agroforestry systems. Future research should focus on the intersection of cultural conservation policies and climate change challenges in agroforestry management.

Ключевые слова агролесомелиорация агролесомелиоративная система управление лесами общинное лесопользование окружающая среда устойчивое развитие Репонг Дамар

Keywords agroforestry forest management community-based forest management community forest management environment sustainable development Repong Damar

1. Adalina Y., Sawitri R. Vegetation Analysis, Physico-Chemical Properties and Economic Potential of Damar (Agathis dammara) in Mount Halimun Salak National Park, West Java, Indonesia. Biodiversitas Journal of Biological Diversity, 2020, no. 21(3), pp. 1122–1129. https://doi.org/10.13057/biodiv/d210336

2. Anderson D., De Souza J. The Importance and Meaning of Prayer Rituals at the End of Life. British Journal of Nursing, 2021, no. 30(1), pp. 34–39. https://doi.org/10.12968/bjon.2021.30.1.34

3. Asteria D., Alvernia P., Kholila B.N., Husein S.I., Asrofani F.W. Forest Conservation by the Indigenous Baduy Community in the Form of Customary Law. Journal of Cultural Heritage Management and Sustainable Development, 2024, no. 14(2), pp. 175–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/jchmsd-12-2020-0171

4. Baynes J., Herbohn J., Smith C., Fisher R., Bray D. Key Factors Which Influence the Success of Community Forestry in Developing Countries. Global Environmental Change, 2015, no. 35(4), pp. 226–238. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2015.09.011

5. Berhane A.T. Indigenous Knowledge of Me’en Community Toward Natural Resource Conservation: A Socio-Philosophical Analysis. An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples, 2024, no. 20(1), pp. 55–66. https://doi.org/10.1177/11771801241231638

6. Bouphapanya S., Hongsuwan P. Trees in Lao Myths and Beliefs: Roles and Symbolic Ecological Meanings Through the Aspects of Folklore. Journal of Ecohumanism, 2024, no. 3(4), pp. 834–845. https://doi.org/10.62754/joe.v3i4.3590

7. Brondízio E.S., Aumeeruddy-Thomas Y., Bates P., Carino J., Fernández-Llamazares Á., Ferrari M.F., Shrestha U.B. Locally Based, Regionally Manifested, and Globally Relevant: Indigenous and Local Knowledge, Values, and Practices for Nature. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2021, no. 46(1), pp. 481–509. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-012220-012127

8. Cadman T., Maraseni T., Koju U.A., Shrestha A., Karki S. Forest Governance in Nepal Concerning Sustainable Community Forest Management and Red Panda Conservation. Land, 2023, no. 12(2), p. 493. https://doi.org/10.3390/land12020493

9. Candiotto L.Z.P., Leite M.D.C. Agroforestry Systems on Brazilian Legal Protected Lands: Permanent Preservation Areas (PPA) and Legal Reservation Areas (LRA). Asian Journal of Geographical Research, 2023, no. 6(1), pp. 15–34. https://doi.org/10.9734/ajgr/2023/v6i1172

10. Causadias J.M. What Is Culture, Systems of People, Places, and Practices. Developmental Science, 2020, no. 24(4), pp. 310–322. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2020.1789360

11. Christmas S.K., Hardiyanti M., Prawira S.A. Role in the Forest Village Community-Based Forest Management Sustainable Development. Journal of Judicial Review, 2021, no. 23(1), pp. 115–128. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v23i1.4387

12. Claridge L., Kobei D. Protected Areas Indigenous Rights and Land Restitution: The Ogiek Judgment of the African Court of Human and Peoples' Rights and Community Land Protection in Kenya. Oryx, 2023, no. 57(3), pp. 313–324. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0030605322000989

13. Cogné M., Lescuyer G. The Role of Agroforestry in Farmers' Strategies and Its Contribution to the Well-Being of Rural People in Timor-Leste. Forests, Trees and Livelihoods, 2024, no. 33(1), pp. 42–67. https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2023.2298986

14. Cottet M., François A., Moreau C., Lecaude C., Vukelic S., Rivière H.A., Evette A. Knowledge Influences Perceptions and Values of Nature-Based Solutions: The Example of Soil and Water Bioengineering Techniques Applied to Urban Rivers. Anthropocene, 2024, no. 45(22), pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ancene.2024.100424

15. De Foresta H., Kusworo A., Michon G., Djatmiko A. When a Garden Looks Like a Forest: Typical Indonesian Agroforest – Society Contribution for Sustainable Development. Bogor, International Center for Research in Agroforestry; Paris, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Jakarta, Ford Foundation, 2000.

16. De Pater C., Verschuuren B., Elands B., van Hal I., Turnhout E. Spiritual Values in Forest Management Plans in British Columbia and the Netherlands. Forest Policy and Economics, 2023, no. 51(2), p. 102955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.102955

17. Dmuchowski W., Baczewska-Dąbrowska A.H., Gworek B. The Role of Temperate Agroforestry in Mitigating Climate Change: A Review. Forest Policy and Economics, 2024, no. 159, pp. 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2023.103136

18. Erbaugh J.T. Responsibilization and Social Forestry in Indonesia. Forest Policy and Economics, 2019, no. 109, pp. 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forpol.2019.102019

19. Fa J.E., Watson J.E.M., Leiper I. Importance of Indigenous Peoples' Lands for the Conservation of Intact Forest Landscapes. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 2020, no. 18, pp. 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1002/fee.2148

20. Febryano I.G., Sari Y.P., Herwanti S., Bintoro A. Planting Patterns in Rubber Agroforestry (Hevea brasiliensis) Developed by the Communities of Menggala Mas Village, Lampung Province, Indonesia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 2024, no. 66(1), pp. 33–45. https://doi.org/10.2478/ffp-2024-0004

21. Haggar J., Pons D., Saenz L., Vides M. Contribution of Agroforestry Systems to Sustaining Biodiversity in Fragmented Forest Landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 2019, no. 283, pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2019.06.006

22. Gould R.K., Soares T.M., Arias-Arévalo P., Cantú-Fernandez M., Baker D., Eyster H.N., Kwon R., Prox L., Rode J., Suarez A., Vatn A., Zúñiga-Barragán J. The Role of Value(s) in Theories of Human Behavior. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 2023, no. 64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2023.101355

23. Gunawan R., Febryano I.G., Bantara I., Yuwono S.B. Social Engineering in the Implementation of Forest and Land Rehabilitation in Girimulyo Village, Lampung Province. Jurnal Belantara, 2024, no. 7(1), pp. 111–125. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v7i1.969

24. Harakan A., Pelizzo R., Kuzenbayev N. Traditional Beliefs and Electoral Behavior in Indonesia. World Affairs, 2023, no. 186(4), pp. 896–924.

https://doi.org/10.1177/00438200231203005

25. Harly L.N.B. Sustainable Forest Management from the Perspective of Customary Law in Indonesia: A Case Study in the Bayan Community. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 2023, no. 1(1), pp. 32–42.

https://doi.org/10.55681/ijssh.v1i1.324

26. Herwanti S., Febryano I.G., Zulfiani D. Economic Value Analysis of Community Forest Food Products in Ngarip Village, Ulu Belu Subdistrict, Tanggamus Regency (A Case from Indonesia). Forestry Ideas, 2019, no. 25(2), pp. 314–328.

https://doi.org/10.30598/jhppk.2016.1.2.105

27. Huang L., Jin C., Pan Y., Zhou L., Hu S., Guo Y., Lindenmayer D.B. Human Activities and Species Biological Traits Drive the Long-Term Persistence of Old Trees in Human-Dominated Landscapes. Nature Plants, 2023, no. 9(6), pp. 898–907.

https://doi.org/10.1038/s41477-023-01412-1

28. Istiawati N.F., Susilo S., Ruja I.N., Widodo S. Construction of Krui Community Knowledge on Repong Damar Culture in Lampung's West Coast. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, no. 412(1), p. 012005. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/412/1/012005

29. Janaki M., Pandit R., Sharma R.K. The Role of Traditional Belief Systems in Conserving Biological Diversity in the Eastern Himalaya Eco-region of India. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2021, no. 26(1), pp. 13–30. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2020.1781982

30. Jiao W., Yang X., Li Y. Traditional Knowledge's Impact on Soil and Water Conservation in Mountain Agricultural Systems: A Case Study of Shexian Dryland Stone Terraced System, China. Ecological Indicators, 2024, no. 159, p. 111742.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2024.111742

31. Kapelari S., Alexopoulos G., Moussouri T., Sagmeister K.J., Stampfer F. Food Heritage Makes a Difference: The Importance of Cultural Knowledge for Improving Education for Sustainable Food Choices. Sustainability, 2020, no. 12(4), p. 1509.

https://doi.org/10.3390/su12041509

32. Kiss B., Sekulova F., Hörschelmann K., Salk C.F., Takahashi W., Wamsler C. Citizen Participation in the Governance of Nature Based Solutions. Environmental Policy and Governance, 2022, no. 32(3), pp. 247–272. https://doi.org/10.1002/eet.1987

33. Koentjaraningrat. Pengantar Ilmu Antropologi. Jakarta, Rineka Cipta Publ., 2015. 391 p. (In Indonesian).

34. Kuang F., Jin J., He R., Ning J., Wan X. Farmers' Livelihood Risks, Livelihood Assets and Adaptation Strategies in Rugao City, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 2020, no. 264, p. 110463. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110463

35. Lam D.P., Hinz E., Lang D.J., Tengö M., von Wehrden H., Martín-López B. Indigenous and Local Knowledge in Sustainability Transformations Research: A Literature Review. Ecology & Society, 2020, no. 25(1). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-11305-250103

36. Laura C.T., Darmawan A., Hilmanto R. Repong Damar Cover Detection in the Pesisir Barat of Lampung Using Satellite Remote Sensing Imagery. Jurnal Hutan Tropis, 2019, no. 7(3), pp. 247–260. https://dx.doi.org/10.20527/jht.v7i3.7511

37. Leduc G., Hansson H. Behavioural Factors for Farmers' Adoption of Agroforestry Practices in Sweden. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 2024, no. 47, pp. 178–189. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2024.03.023

38. Lee S.M., Kim Y.S., Jaung W., Latifah S., Afifi M., Fisher L.A. Forests, Fuelwood and Livelihoods: Energy Transition Patterns in Eastern Indonesia. Energy Policy, 2015,

no. 85, pp. 61–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2015.04.030

39. Luo Y., Li Y., Li C., Wu Q. Influence of the Kinship Networks on Farmers' Willingness to Revitalize Idle Houses. Sustainability, 2023, no. 15(13), p. 10285. https://doi.org/10.3390/su151310285

40. Marini G.V., Healey J.R., Wong J.L., Stara K., Tsiakiris R., Halley J.M. When Nature Meets the Divine: Effect of Prohibition Regimes on the Structure and Tree Species Composition of Sacred Forests in Northern Greece. Web Ecology, 2020, no. 20(2), pp. 53–86. https://doi.org/10.5194/we-20-53-2020

41. Maura M.C.B.P., Iswandaru D., Kuswandono, Fitriana Y.R., Rohman F. Analysis of Community Knowledge on the Conservation of White-Winged Duck (Asarcornis scutulata) in Way Kambas National Park. Jurnal Belantara, 2024, no. 7(1), pp. 27–40. https://doi.org/10.29303/jbl.v7i1.1035

42. Mir M.A.M., Shelley B., Ooi C.S. Uses of Tourism Resources for Educational and Community Development: A Systematic Literature Review and Lessons. Tourism Management Perspectives, 2024, no. 53, p. 101278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2024.101278

43. Maulidyna A., Hartawan B.S., Agustin H.N., Irfan A.N., Septiasari A., Utina R., Setyawan A.D. The Role of Local Belief and Wisdom of the Bajo Community in Marine Conservation Efforts. International Journal of Bonorowo Wetlands, 2021, no. 11(1), pp. 50–63. https://doi.org/10.13057/bonorowo/w110105

44. McGrath D.G., Castello L., Almeida O.T., Estupinan G.M.B. Market Formalization, Governance, and the Integration of Community Fisheries in the Brazilian Amazon. Society & Natural Resources, 2015, no. 28, pp. 513–529. https://doi.org/10.1080/08941920.2015.1014607

45. Megeirhi H.A., Woosnam K.M., Ribeiro M.A., Ramkissoon H., Denley T.J. Employing a Value-Belief-Norm Framework to Gauge Carthage Residents' Intentions to Support Sustainable Cultural Heritage Tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 2020,

no. 28(9), pp. 1351–1370. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669582.2020.1738444

46. Noor M., Fan J.B., Zhang J.X., Zhang C.J., Sun S.N., Gan L., Yan X.B. Effects of Shade Stress on Growth and Responsive Mechanisms of Bermudagrass (Cynodon dactylon L.). Journal of Plant Growth Regulation, 2023, no. 42(7), pp. 4037–4047.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-023-10920-5

47. Nugraha L.M., Hakim L., Abdoellah O.S., Darmawan A., Winarno B. Socio-Ecological Effect of Transition Landscape Dynamics From Agroforests to Monoculture Plantation in Upper Citarum Watershed. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2024, no. 12(2), pp. 279–295.

https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i2.813

48. Panda L.R., Uniyal A., Kukreti J., Singh N. The Role of Non-Timber Forest Products for Livelihood Diversification in Bundelkhand Region of Uttar Pradesh. International Journal of Economic Plants, 2024, no. 11(1), pp. 70–78.

https://doi.org/10.23910/2/2024.5005

49. Pearson J., Jackson G., McNamara K.E. Climate-Driven Losses to Knowledge Systems and Cultural Heritage: A Literature Review Exploring the Impacts on Indigenous and Local Cultures. The Anthropocene Review, 2023, no. 10(2), pp. 343–366.

https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196211005482

50. Pieper M. Technology as a Strategy of the Human? A Comparison Between the Extension Concept and the Fetish Concept of Technology. Philosophy & Technology, 2024, no. 37(1), p. 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-024-00697-0

51. Prigioniero A., Zuzolo D., Niinemets Ü., Guarino C. Nature-Based Solutions as Tools for Air Phytoremediation: A Review of the Current Knowledge and Gaps. Environmental Pollution, 2021, no. 277, p. 116817. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2021.116817

52. Rahayu S., Laraswati D., Permadi D.B., Sahide M.A.K., Maryudi A. Only a Noise? The Role of Non-Governmental Organizations in the Policy Processes of a New Social Forestry Model in Indonesia. Small-Scale Forestry, 2022, no. 22(2), pp. 253–270.

https://doi.org/10.1007/s11842-022-09525-9

53. Redding G. Societal Knowledge Quality as Catalyst for the Competitive Productivity of Technology: One in a Set of Several Universal Processes in Trajectories of Societal Progress. International Business Review, 2023, no. 32(6), p. 102096.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2022.102096

54. Rivero R.M., Mittler R., Blumwald E., Zandalinas S.I. Developing Climate-Resilient Crops: Improving Plant Tolerance to Stress Combination. The Plant Journal, 2022, no. 109(2), pp. 373–389. https://doi.org/10.1111/tpj.15483

55. Roslinda E., Prisila F.W., Mariani Y. The Patterns of Agroforestry and Its Contribution to the Community Income. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2023, no. 11(3), pp. 543–557.

https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i3.749

56. Roux J.L., Konczal A.A., Bernasconi A., Bhagwat S.A., De Vreese R., Doimo I., Winkel G. Exploring Evolving Spiritual Values of Forests in Europe and Asia: A Transition Hypothesis Toward Re-spiritualizing Forests. Ecology & Society, 2022, no. 27(4), pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.5751/es-13509-270420

57. Rozaki Z., Rejeki T.M., Rahayu L., Ramli M.F. Farmers' Food Security in Forest and Peatland Fires Prone Areas of South Kalimantan, Indonesia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2023, no. 11(3), pp. 527–542. https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v11i3.770

58. Samrin S., Millang S., Ridwan Daud M. Land productivity and land equivalent ratio of agroforestry system in Marena Customary Forest, Enrekang Regency, South Sulawesi Province, Indonesia. Jurnal Sylva Lestari, 2024, no. 12(2), pp. 532–548.

https://doi.org/10.23960/jsl.v12i2.877

59. Shiferaw A., Hebo M., Senishaw G. The spiritual ecology of sacred landscapes: Evidence from sacred forests of the Sebat Bête Gurage, Central-South Ethiopia. Cogent Social Sciences, 2023, no. 9(1), pp. 1–22. https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2023.2210900

60. Sharma A., Thakur D., Uniyal S.K. Taboos: aboos: Traditional beliefs and customs for resource management in the Western Himalaya. Indian Journal of Traditional Knowledge, 2021, no. 20(2), pp. 575–581. https://doi.org/10.56042/ijtk.v20i2.29346

61. Singh H.B., Yaipharembi N., Huidrom E., Devi C.A. Traditional Knowledge, Beliefs, and Practices Associated with Ethnic People of Manipur, North East India in Conservation of Biodiversity. Traditional Ecological Knowledge of Resource Management in Asia. Cham, Springer International Publ., 2023, pp. 61–75.

62. Sinthumule N.I. Traditional Ecological Knowledge and Its Role in Biodiversity Conservation: A Systematic Review. Frontiers in Environmental Science, 2023, no. 11, p. 1164900. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2023.1164900

63. Sinthumule N.I. Challenges Facing Traditional Ecological Knowledge in the Vhembe District Municipality in Limpopo Province, South Africa. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 2024, no. 10, p. 101027. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101027

64. Song B., Robinson G.M., Bardsley D.K., Xue Y., Wang B. Multifunctional Agriculture in a Peri-Urban Fringe: Chinese Farmers' Responses to Shifts in Policy and Changing Socio-Economic Conditions. Land Use Policy, 2023, no. 133, p. 106869.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2023.106869

65. Suyitno I., Pratiwi Y., Andajani K., Arista H.D. The Cultural Meaning in Ritual Traditions for the Character of Osing People Banyuwangi, Indonesia. Qualitative Report, 2023, no. 28(7), pp. 1–18. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2023.6156

66. Tarun M.T.G., Gumiran I.G., Peñaflor B.L. Cultivating Multifaceted Participation in the Community-Based Forest Management (Cbfm) Program in Communities of Northern Isabela. American Journal of Environment and Climate, 2024, no. 3(2), pp. 91–105.

https://doi.org/10.54536/ajec.v3i2.3262

67. Varghese J., Crawford S.S. A Cultural Framework for Indigenous, Local, and Science Knowledge Systems in Ecology and Natural Resource Management. Ecological Monographs, 2020, no. 91(1). https://doi.org/10.1002/ecm.1431

68. Yeshey P., Ford R.M., Keenan R.J., Nitschke C.R. Religious Beliefs and Wildlife Value Orientations Influence Tolerance of Wildlife Impacts in Bhutan. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 2024, no. 29(3), pp. 300–318. https://doi.org/10.1080/10871209.2023.2234389

69. Wibowo N., Harianto S.P., Dewi B.S., Febryano I.G. Integration of Local Technology in Damar Damar Harvesting: Case Study of Harvesting Culture in Pahmungan Village, Lampung. Makila, 2024, no. 18(2), pp. 325–337.

https://doi.org/10.30598/makila.v18i2.15410

70. Williams P.A., Sikutshwa L., Shackleton S. Acknowledging Indigenous and Local Knowledge to Facilitate Collaboration in Landscape Approaches – Lessons From a Systematic Review. Land, 2020, no. 9(33), pp. 1–17. https://doi.org/10.3390/LAND9090331

71. Wulandari C., Rahmawaty, Putra E.T.S., Isnurdiansyah, Rahayu S. Agroforestri Damar Mata Kucing di Lampung dan Agroforestri Kemenyan di Sumatra Utara: Kearifan lokal yang mendukung keberlanjutan penghidupan masyarakat dan lingkungan. Agroforestry Nusantara, 2023, vol. 1. Bogor, World Agroforestry (ICRAF). 180 p. (In Indonesian).

72. Yudistira R., Nurcaya N., Julhadi J., Pattiasina P.P.J. The Role of Linguistics and Local Wisdom on Knowing Harmony Between Religions at Tana Toraja. Muslim Heritage, 2022, no. 7(2), pp. 409–431. https://doi.org/10.21154/muslimheritage.v7i2.5023

73. Zas R., Quiroga R., Touza R., Vázquez-González C., Sampedro L., Lema M. Damar Tapping Potential of Atlantic Maritime Pine Forests Depends on Tree Age and Timing of Tapping. Industrial Crops and Products, 2020, no. 157, p. 112940.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112940

74. Zhang J., Basso B., Price R.F., Putman G., Shuai G. Estimating Plant Distance in Maize Using Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV). PLOS ONE, 2018, no. 13(4).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195223

75. Zhao X., Elahi E., Wang F., Xing H., Khalid Z. Sustainable Tourism Development for Traditional Chinese Drama's Intangible Cultural Heritage. Heliyon, 2024, no. 10(3), e25483. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e25483