Aboveground Stand Phytomass in Experimental Cultures of Lodgepole Pine in Syktyvkar Forestry of the Komi Republic
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-6-31-43Keywords:
lodgepole pine, forest plantations, aboveground phytomass, phytomass components, regression analysis, Komi RepublicAbstract
The purpose of this work is to evaluate and comparatively analyze the above ground phytomass of lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl.) and Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris L.) in experimental cultures. The results of studies of experimental cultures of lodgepde pine in Syktyvkar forestry of the Komi Republic are presented. The cultures were established by planting 2-year-old seedlings in spring 2006 on a pine clear-cut in 2004 with the area of 1 ha. Pine seedlings of local origin were used for control. The aboveground phytomass of both species was assessed using the model tree method. Moisture content and absolute dry matter content of phytomass components were determined. For the majority of phytomass fractions of lodgepde pine the dry matter content is higher than that of common pine. The weight of model trees of Scots pine in absolutely dry state ranges from 3 to 17 kg, lodgepde pine – from 4 to 27 kg depending on the diameter. Regression analysis of data on model trees was carried out. It is shown that the allometric (steppe) equation can be used to calculate the total aboveground phytomass and the mass of most of its fractions. The exception is the mass of dry branches, for which allometric dependence on trunk diameter was not found. The weight of phytomass in freshly cut condition is 21 t/ha for Scots pine, 32 t/ha for lodgepde pine, and 8.1 and 12.5 t/ha in absolutely dry condition, respectively. The structure of aboveground phytomass of the studied species is quite similar, except for needles, the share of which is higher in lodgepde pine than in Scots pine. The weight of almost all components of lodgepde pine phytomass, except for dry twigs, is 20–50 % higher compared to Scots pine. The total aboveground phytomass of lodgepde pine in cultures at a planting density of 2.5 t/ha is 1.5 times higher than that of Scots pine. The obtained results are necessary for replenishment of the database on productivity and in the future for estimation of carbon deposition by artificial plantations.
For citation: Pristova T.A., Fedorkov A.L., Novakovsky A.B. Aboveground Stand Phytomass in Experimental Cultures of Lodgepole Pine in Syktyvkar Forestry of the Komi Republic. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 6, pp. 31–43. (In Russ.).
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-6-31-43
Downloads
References
Бабич Н.А., Клевцов Д.Н., Евдокимов И.В. Зональные закономерности изменения фитомассы культур сосны: моногр. Архангельск: САФУ, 2010. 140 с. Babich N.A., Klevtsov D.N., Evdokimov I.V. Zonal Patterns of Changes in the Phytomass of Pine Plantations. Arkhangelsk, Northern (Arctic) Federal University Publ., 2010. 140 p. (In Russ.).
Бабич Н.А., Мерзленко М.Д. Биологическая продуктивность лесных культур. Архангельск: АГТУ, 1998. 89 с. Babich N.A., Merzlenko M.D. Biological Productivity of Forest Plantations. Arkhangelsk, AGTU Publ, 1998. 89 p. (In Russ.).
Бабич Н.А., Мерзленко М.Д., Евдокимов И.В. Фитомасса культур сосны и ели в Европейской части России. Архангельск, 2004. 112 с. Babich N.A., Merzlenko M.D., Evdokimov I.V. Phytomass of Pine and Spruce Plantations in the European Part of Russia. Arkhangelsk, 2004. 112 p. (In Russ.).
Бобкова К.С., Галенко Э.П., Забоева И.В., Торлопова Н.В., Ивасишина Н.А., Кузин С.Н., Мартынюк З.П., Загирова С.В., Тужилкина В.В., Робакидзе Е.А., Сенькина С.Н., Мазура Н.С., Куприянова Е.Б., Мелехина Е.Н. Биопродукционный процесс в лесных экосистемах Севера / отв. ред. К.С. Бобкова, Э.П. Галенко; УрО РАН. Урал. отд-ние. КомиНЦ. Ин-т биологии. СПб.: Наука, 2001. 278 с. Bobkova K.S., Galenko E.P., Zaboeva I.V., Torlopova N.V., Ivasishina N.A., Kuzin S.N., Martinuk Z.P., Zagirova S.V., Tuzhilkina V.V., Robakidze E.A., Senkina S.N., Mazura N.S., Kupriyanova E.B., Melehina E.N. Bioproduction Process in the Forest Ecosystems of the North. Saint Peterburg, Nauka Publ., 2001. 278 p. (In Russ.).
Гутий Л.Н., Федорков А.Л. Экспериментальные культуры сосны скрученной в Сыктывкарском лесничестве Республики Коми // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2016. № 1. С. 48–54. Gytiy L.N., Fedorkov A.L. Experimental Plantations of Longepole Pine in the Syktyvkar Forestry in the Komi Republic. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2016, no. 1, pp. 48–54. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.1.48
Демидова Н.А., Дуркина Т.М., Гоголева Л.Г., Демиденко С.А., Быков Ю.С., Парамонов А.А. Рост и развитие сосны скрученной (Pinus contorta Loud. var. latifolia S. Wats) в условиях северной тайги // Тр. СПбНИИЛХ. 2016. № 2. С. 45–59. Demidova N.A., Durkina T.M., Gogoleva L.G., Demidenko S.A., Bykov Yu.S., Paramonov A.A. Growth, and Development of a Lodgepole Pine (Pinus contorta Loud. Var latifolia S. Wats) in the Northern Boreal Forest. Proceedings of the Saint Petersburg Forestry Research Institute, 2016, no. 2, pp. 45–59. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21178/2079-6080.2016.2.42
Дроздов Ю.И. Сосна скрученная в культурах европейской части России // Лесохоз. информ. 2002. № 9. С. 21–23. Drozdov Yu.I. Lodgepole Pine Plantations in the Cultures of the European part of Russia. Forestry Information, 2002, no. 9, pp. 21–23. (In Russ.).
Кофман Г.Б. Рост и форма деревьев. Новосибирск: Наука. Сиб. отд-ние, 1986. 211 с. Kofman G.B. Growth and Shape of Trees. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1986. 211 p. (In Russ.).
Мелехов И.С. Интродукция хвойных в лесном хозяйстве // Лесоведение. 1984. № 6. С. 72–78. Melekhov I.S. Introduction of Coniferous Trees in Forestry. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1984, no. 6, pp. 72–78. (In Russ.).
Москалев А.А., Новаковский А.Б. Статистические методы в экологии с использованием R, Statistica, Excel и SPSS. Сыктывкар: СыктГУ, 2014. 197 с. Moskalev A.A., Novakovsky A.B. Statistical Methods in Ecology using R, Statistica, Excel and SPSS. Syktyvkar, SSU Publ., 2014. 197 p. (In Russ.).
Раевский Б.В., Пеккоев А.Н. Перспективы выращивания сосны скрученной в Южной Карелии // Инновации и технологии в лесном хозяйстве – 2013: материалы III междунар. науч.-практ. конф., Санкт-Петербург, 22–24 мая 2013 г. СПб., 2013. Ч. 2. C. 180–190. Raevsky B.V., Pekkoev A.N. Prospects for Growing Lodgepole Pine in Southern Karelia. Innovations and Technologies in Forestry–2013: Materials of the III International Conference Scientific and Practical conference. Saint Peterburg, 2013. Part 2, pp. 180–190. (In Russ.).
Усольцев В.А. Биологическая продуктивность лесов Северной Евразии: методы, база данных и ее приложения. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2007. 636 с. Usoltsev V.A. Biological Productivity of Forests of Northern Eurasia: Methods, Database and its Applications. Ekaterinburg, Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publ., 2007. 636 p. (In Russ.).
Усольцев В.А., Залесов С.В. Методы определения биологической продуктивности насаждений. Екатеринбург: УГЛТУ, 2005. 147 с. Usoltsev V.A., Zalesov S.V. Methods for Determining the Biological Productivity of Plantings. Yekaterinburg, USFU Publ., 2005. 147 p. (In Russ.).
Уткин А.И., Ифанова М.Г., Ермолова Л.С. Первичная биологическая продуктивность культур сосны обыкновенной во Владимирской области // Лесоведение. 1981. № 4. С. 19–27. Utkin A.I., Ifanova M.G., Ermolova L.S. Primary Biological Productivity of Common Pine Plantations in the Vladimir Region. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1981, no. 4, pp. 19–27. (In Russ.).
Федорков А.Л., Гутий Л.Н. Состояние экспериментальных культур сосны скрученной в Республике Коми // Вестн. Ин-та биологии КомиНЦ УрО РАН. 2017. № 2(200). С. 25–31. Fedorkov A.L., Gutiy L.N. The State of Experimental Plantations of Lodgepole Pine in the Komi Republic. Vestnik instituta biologii Komi nauchnogo centra Ural’skogo otdeleniya Rossijskoj Akademii Nauk = Bulletin of Institute of biology of the Komi Research Center of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2017, no. 2, pp. 25–31. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31140/j.vestnikib.2017.2(200).5
Федорков А.Л., Туркин А.А. Экспериментальные культуры сосны скрученной в Республике Коми // Лесоведение. 2010. № 1. С. 70–74. Fedorkov A.L., Turkin A.A. Experimental Plantations of Lodgepole Pine in the Komi Republic. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2010, no. 1, pp. 70–74. (In Russ.).
Феклистов П.А., Бирюков С.Ю., Федяев А.Л. Сравнительные экологобиологические особенности сосны скрученной и обыкновенной в северной подзоне европейской тайги. Архангельск: АГТУ, 2008. 118 с. Feklistov P.A., Biryukov S.Yu., Fedyaev A.L. Comparative Ecological and Biological Features of Lodgepole and Common pine in The Northern Subzone of the European Taiga. Arkhangelsk, AGTU Publ., 2008.118 p. (In Russ.).
Элайс Т.С. Североамериканские деревья: определитель / пер. с англ. Е.И. Русановской; под ред. И.Ю. Коропачинского. Новосибирск: Гео, 2014. 959 с. Elais T.S. North American trees: Determinant. Novosibirsk, Geo Publ., 2014. 959 p. (In Russ.).
Backlund I., Bergsten U. Biomass Production of Dense Direct-Seeded Longepole Pine (Pinus contorta) at Short Rotation Periods. Silva Fennica, 2012, vol. 46, no. 4, pp. 609–623. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.914
Baskerville G.L. Use of Logarithmic Regression in the Estimation of Plant Biomass. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1972, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 49–53. https://doi.org/10.1139/x72-009
Elfving B., Ericsson T., Rosvall O. The Introduction of Lodgepole Pine for Wood Production in Sweden – a Review. Forest Ecology and Management, 2001, vol. 141, iss. 1-2, pp. 15–29. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(00)00485-0
Elfving B., Ulvcrona K.A., Egnell G. Biomass Equations for Lodgepole Pine in Northern Sweden. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 2017, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 89–96. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjfr-2016-0131
Fedorkov A., Gutiy L. Performance of Lodgepole Pine and Scots Pine in Field Trials Located in North-West Russia. Silva Fennica, 2017, vol. 51, no. 1. 10 p. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.1692
Manning G.N., Massie M.R.C., Rudd J. Metric Single-Tree Weight Tables for the Yukon Territory. Environment Canada, Canadian Forestry Service, Pacific Forest Research Centre, Victoria, B.C., Inf. Rep. BC-X-250. 1984. 170 p.
Nilsson P., Cory N. Skogsdata, Аktuella Uppgifter om de Svenska Skogarna från Riksskogstaxeringen. Forestry Statistics, Umeå, Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, 2010. 119 p. (In Swedish).
Repola J. Biomass Equations for Scots Pine and Norway Spruce in Finland. Silva Fennica, 2009, vol. 43, no. 4, pp. 605–624. https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.184
Varmola M., Salminen H., Rikala R., Kerkela M. Survival and Early Development of Lodgepole pine. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2000, vol. 15, iss. 4, pp. 410–423. https://doi.org/10.1080/028275800750172619
Zhigunov A.V., Butenko O.Y. Estimating the Growth of 20-to 26-year-old Lodgepole Pine Plantations in the Leningrad Region of Russia. Folia Forestalia Polonica, 2019, vol. 61, iss. 1, pp. 58–63.
