Range Expansion of Cotoneaster lucidus Schlecht. in Forest Parks of Yekaterinburg
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-73-84Keywords:
Cotoneaster lucidus, cotoneaster, invasion, forest parks, cotoneaster ecological features, cotoneaster biological features, cotoneaster habitat, YekaterinburgAbstract
Shiny cotoneaster (Cotoneaster lucidus Schlecht.) is one of the oldest plants. It originated in Southeast Asia and has many primitive traits. Its survival strategy is fascinating. Its introduction range extends throughout Eurasia. The cotoneaster has been actively introduced to all forest parks and city forests around Yekaterinburg. Its spread was facilitated by the presence of edible, long-preserved fruits on the shoots, which were the food supply for many bird species. The research aims at analyzing the distribution patterns and features of ecological occurrence of Cotoneaster lucidus in the forest parks of Yekaterinburg. There were 15 forest parks surveyed, and in 11 of them it is found in the undergrowth. The studies were carried out on the basis of forest inventory materials. Local habitats were monitored in four forest parks most visited by the population of the city: Sanatorny Forest Park, Uktusskiy Forest Park, Park named after Foresters of Russia, Shartashskaya Forest Park. Optimal environment for cotoneaster growth are mixed herbs pine forests with stand density of 0.7–0.8. Mature stands of the 1st resistance class are also appropriate. The highest occurrence of cotoneaster in the Central Forest Park is 7 % of the total area of the forest park. The density of cotoneaster increases with increasing stand density from 320 to 1,140 individuals. At a density of 0.3–0.5 the number of individuals per unit area decreases, and at 0.1–0.2 cotoneaster disappears completely as a result of increased anthropogenic load and the inflow of light in excessive amounts. High shade tolerance is a bioecological feature of Cotoneaster lucidus. Morphometric parameters of plants in the studied forest parks depend on the density of the tree canopy; the maximum values were found for specimens in the Sanatorny Forest Park, where the distribution of shrubs is rare with a density of the stand of 0.7. A positive correlation of plant height with projection area and crown volume was found. The spatial distribution of individuals varies depending on the forest park and its attendance by people. For instance, in the Shartashsky Forest Park 60.4 % of cotoneasters are located in dense undergrowth, and in the Uktusskiy Forest Park 66.7 % are found in sparse undergrowth. Immature individuals are present in all of the Forest Parks, which indicates successful naturalization and high potential of the species.
For citation: Tishkina E.A., Semkina L.A., Shevelina I.V. Range Expansion of Cotoneaster lucidus Schlecht. in Forest Parks of Yekaterinburg. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 5, pp. 73–84. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-73-84
Downloads
References
Андреева Е.Н., Баккал И.Ю., Горшков В.В., Лянгузова И.В., Мазная Е.А., Нешатаев В.Ю., Нешатаева В.Ю., Ставрова Н.И., Ярмишко В.Т., Ярмишко М.А. Методы изучения лесных сообществ. СПб.: СПбГУ, 2002. 240 с.Andreeva E.N., Bakkal I.Yu., Gorshkov V.V., Lyanguzova I.V., Maznaya E.A., Neshataev V.Yu., Neshataeva V.Yu., Stavrova N.I., Yarmishko V.T., Yarmishko M.A. Methods of Studying Forest Communities. Saint Petersburg, SPbU Publ., 2002. 240 р. (In Russ.).
Антропов К.М., Вараксин А.Н. Оценка загрязнения атмосферного воздуха г. Екатеринбурга диоксидом азота методом Land Use Regression // Экол. системы и приборы. 2011. № 8. С. 47–54. Antropov K.M., Varaksin A.N. Assessing Nitrogen Dioxide Air Pollution in Ekaterinburg Land Use Regression Model. Ecological Systems and Devices, 2011, no. 8, pp. 47–54. (In Russ.).
Веселкин Д.В., Коржиневская А.А., Подгаевская Е.Н. Состав и численность адвентивных и инвазивных кустарников и деревьев подлеска в лесопарках г. Екатеринбурга // Вестн. ТГУ. Биология. 2018. № 42. С. 102–118. Veselkin D.V., Korzhinevskaya A.A., Podgayevskaya E.N. The Species Composition and Abundance of Alien and Invasive Understory Shrubs and Trees in Urban Forests of Yekaterinburg. Vestnik Tomskogo Gosudarstvennogo Universiteta. Biologiya = Tomsk State University Journal of Biology, 2018, no. 42, pp. 102–118. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17223/19988591/42/5
Встовская Т.Н. Древесные растения – интродуценты Сибири: Abelia–Ligustrum. Новосибирск: Наука, 1985. 278 с. Vstovskaya T.N. Woody Plants – Introduced Species of Siberia: Abelia-Ligustrum. Novosibirsk, Nauka Publ., 1985. 278 p. (In Russ.).
Головатин М.Г., Ляхов А.Г. Орнитокомплексы лесопарков Екатеринбурга // Рус. орнитол. журн. 2013. Т. 22, вып. 858. С. 709–716. Golovatin M.G., Lyakhov A.G. Ornithocomplexes of Forest Parks in Yekaterinburg. Тhe Russian Journal of Ornithology, 2013, vol. 22, iss. 858, pp. 709–716. (In Russ.).
Гусев Н.Н., Синицын С.Г., Сухих В.И., Букин Н.И. Лесоустройство в СССР. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1981. 328 с. Gusev N.N., Sinitsyn S.G., Sukhikh V.I., Bukin N.I. Forest Management in the USSR. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1981. 328 p. (In Russ.).
Деревья и кустарники СССР: Дикорастущие, культивируемые и перспективные для интродукции / под ред. С.Я. Соколова, Б.К. Шишкина; АН СССР. Ботан. ин-т им. В.Л. Комарова. М.; Л.: АН СССР, 1949–1965. Т. 3: Покрытосеменные. Семейства троходендроновые – розоцветные. 1954. 872 с. Angiosperms. Trochodendraceae – Rosaceae Families. Vol. 3. Trees and Shrubs of the USSR: Wild, Cultivated and Promising for Introduction. Ed. by S.Ya. Sokolov, B.K. Shishkin. Moscow, AN SSSR Publ., 1954. 872 p.
Князев М.С. Род Cotoneaster (Rosaceae) на Урале // Ботан. журн. 2007. Т. 92, № 3. С. 420–428. Knyazev M.S. The Genus Cotoneaster (Rosaceae) in the Urals. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 2007, vol. 92, no. 3, pp. 420–428. (In Russ.).
Коропачинский И.Ю., Встовская Т.Н. Древесные растения Азиатской России. Новосибирск: Акад. изд-во «Гео», 2012. 707 с. Koropachinskiy I.Yu., Vstovskaya T.N. Woody Plants of Asian Russia. Novosibirsk, Geo Publ., 2012. 707 p. (In Russ.).
Криштофович А.Н. Палеоботаника. Л.: Гостоптехиздат, 1957. 650 с. Krishtafovich A.N. Palaeobotanica. Leningrad, Gostoptehizdat Publ., 1957. 650 p. (In Russ.).
Куликов П.В., Золотарева Н.В., Подгаевская Е.Н. Эндемичные растения Урала во флоре Свердловской области. Екатеринбург: Гощицкий, 2013. 610 с. Kulikov P.V., Zolotareva N.V., Podgaevskaya E.N. Endemic Plants of the Urals in the Flora of the Sverdlovsk Region. Yekaterinburg, Goshchitskiy Publ., 2013. 610 p. (In Russ.).
Ладейщикова Г.В., Петров А.П. Интродуценты в лесопарковой зоне г. Екатеринбурга // Альманах современной науки и образования. 2008. № 11. С. 83–86. Ladeyshchikova G.V., Petrov A.P. Introduced Species in the Forest Park Area of Yekaterinburg. Al’manakh sovremennoy nauki i obrazovaniya, 2008, no. 11, pp. 83–86. (In Russ.).
Лесоустроительная инструкция: утв. приказом Минприроды России от 29 марта 2018 г. № 122: зарегистрировано в Мин-ве юстиции РФ 20 апр. 2018 г., № 50859. Режим доступа: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/542621790 (дата обращения: 29.08.22). Forest Management Instruction: Approved by the Order No. 122 of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation Dated March 29, 2018: Registered with the Ministry of Justice of the Russian Federation on April 20, 2018, Registration No. 50859. (In Russ.).
Мамаев С.А. Определитель деревьев и кустарников Урала. Местные и интродуцированные виды. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2000. 260 с. Mamaev S.A. Identification Guide of Trees and Shrubs of the Urals. Native and Introduced Species. Yekaterinburg, UB RAS Publ., 2000. 260 p. (In Russ.).
Петров А.П., Ладейщикова Г.В., Зотеева Е.А. Дигрессия фитоценозов и натурализация древесных растений в лесопарковой зоне г. Екатеринбурга // Ботан. исследования на Урале. Пермь: Перм. гос. ун-т, 2009. С. 279–281. Petrov A.P., Ladeyshchikova G.V., Zoteeva E.A. Digression of Phytocenoses and Naturalization of Woody Plants in the Forest Park Zone of Yekaterinburg. Botanical Studies in the Urals. Perm, PSU Publ., 2009, pp. 279–281. (In Russ.).
Стурман В.И. Природные и техногенные факторы загрязнения атмосферного воздуха российских городов // Вестн. Удмурт. ун-та. Сер.: Биология. Науки о Земле. 2008. Вып. 2. С. 15–29. Sturman V.I. Natural and Technogenic Factors of Air Pollution in Russian Cities. Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series Biology. Earth Sciences, 2008, iss. 2, pp. 15–29. (In Russ.).
Тахтаджян А.Л. Происхождение покрытосеменных растений. М.: Высш. шк., 1961. 132 с. Tahtadzhyan A.L. The Origin of Angiosperms. Moscow, Vysshaya shkola Publ., 1961. 132 p. (In Russ.).
Третьякова А.С. Закономерности распределения чужеродных растений в антропогенных местообитаниях Свердловской области // Рос. Журн. Биол. Инвазий. 2015. № 4. С. 118–128. Tretyakova A.S. Regularities of Distribution of Alien Plants in Anthropogenous Habitats of Sverdlovsk Oblast. Russian Journal of Biological Invasions, 2015, no. 4, pp. 118–128. (In Russ.).
Шевелина И.В., Нагимов З.Я., Метелев Д.В. Характеристика лесного фонда зеленой зоны в пределах муниципального образования «г. Екатеринбург» // Современ. проблемы науки и образования. 2015. № 1-1. Режим доступа: http://science-education.ru/ ru/article/view?id=18547 (дата обращения: 29.08.22). Shevelina I.V., Nagimov Z.Ya., Metelev D.V. Characteristic of the Forest Fund of the Urban Forest Zone of Municipal Unit “City of Yekaterinburg”. Modern problems of science and education, 2015, no. 1-1. (In Russ.).
Carpenter K.J. Stomatal Architecture and Evolution in Basal Angiosperms. American Journal of Botany, 2005, vol. 92, iss. 10, pp. 1595–1615. https://doi.org/10.3732/ ajb.92.10.1595
Díaz Velez M.C., Sérsic A.N., Traveset A., Paiaro V. The Role of Frugivorous Birds in Fruit Removal and Seed Germination of the Invasive Alien Cotoneaster franchetii in Central Argentina. Austral Ecology, 2018, vol. 43, iss. 5, pp. 558–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/ aec.12592
Dickoré W.B., Kasperek G. Species of Cotoneaster (Rosaceae, Maloideae) Indigenous to, Naturalising or Commonly Cultivated in Central Europe. Willdenowia, 2010, vol. 40(1), pp. 13–45. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.40.40102
Hylmö B., Fryer J. Cotoneasters in Europe. Acta Botanica Fennica, 1999, vol. 162, pp. 179–184.
Markgraf Fr. Forsythia europaea und die Forsythien Asiens. Mitteilungen der Deutschen dendrologischen gesellschaft, 1930, Nr. 42, Ss. 1–12. (In Ger.).
Potter D., Eriksson T., Evans R.C., Oh S., Smedmark J.E.E., Morgan D.R., Kerr M., Robertson K.R., Arsenault M., Dickinson T.A., Campbell C.S. Phylogeny and Classification of Rosaceae. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2007, vol. 266, pp. 5–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00606-007-0539-9
Sennikov A. Fryer J. & Hylmö B. Cotoneasters: A Comprehensive Guide to Shrubs for Flowers, Fruit, and Foliage. Nordic Journal of Botany, 2010, vol. 28, iss. 4, pp. 509–512. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-1051.2009.00639.x
Sennikov A. Proposal to Conserve the Name Mespilus tomentosa (Cotoneaster tomentosus) against Mespilus orientalis (Rosaceae). Taxon, 2011 vol. 60, iss. 2, p. 606. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.602045
Sennikov A.N., Somlyay L. Atlas Florae Europaeae Notes 17: Typification of Cotoneaster tomentosus (Rosaceae) and Its Synonyms. Taxon, 2011, vol. 60, iss. 2, pp. 579–584. https://doi.org/10.1002/tax.602026
