Ecological and Cenotic Activity of Species of the Middle Taiga Flora
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-6-94-106Keywords:
ecological and cenotic structure, floristic composition, segetal species, species classification, forest nursery, species activity, weed plants, effect of weed plants on plant communities, Northwest RussiaAbstract
The control of the main weeds of forestry objects has always played an important role in forestry. The development of evidence-based measures, primarily in the areas of forest nurseries, relies on identifying the features of formation, functioning and activity of segetal plant species. The research aims at developing and adapting evidence-based approaches to the weed control in forest nurseries of the middle taiga zone of the European North by analyzing the ecological status of species in a particular agrophytocenosis and by differentiating species according to the nature of ecological and cenotic relationships. Data on plants was obtained in forest nurseries of Northwestern Russia. The diversity of plant communities was studied by route method throughout the forest agrocenoses, carrying out geobotanical descriptions of the ground cover. The projective cover of vascular plants was observed when describing the vegetation. The results revealed the following regularities: segetal flora is dominated by a group of predominantly weed species, consisting of eurytopic and active weed species (42 %); stenotopic and hemistenotopic plant species, the so-called typical or faithful complex species, represent 34 %; facultative plant species complete the series (24 %). The systematization of a large amount of scientific data became the basis for the theoretical substantiation and implementation in practice of monitoring the most active plant species in agrophytocenoses of forest nurseries. A comprehensive analysis of plant communities of forest nurseries allowed the authors to propose their floristic classification of vegetation. The presented classification considers all the floristic and ecological differences between the studied communities and can be used in the weed control in the northern part of the Russian plain.
For citation: Konovalova I.S., Konovalov D.Yu. Ecological and Cenotic Activity of Species of the Middle Taiga Flora. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 6, pp. 94–106. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-6-94-106
Downloads
References
Бабич Н.А., Нечаева И.С. Сорная растительность лесных питомников: моногр. Архангельск: САФУ, 2010. 187 с. Babich N.A., Nechaeva I.S. Weed Vegetation of Forest Nurseries: Monograph. Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2010. 187 p. (In Russ.).
Булохов А.Д. Травяная растительность Юго-Западного Нечерноземья России. Брянск, 2001. 296 с. Bulokhov A.D. Herbaceous Vegetation of the South-Western Nonchernozem Zone of Russia. Bryansk, 2001. 296 p. (In Russ.).
Булохов А.Д., Семенищенков Ю.А., Панасенко Н.Н., Харин А.В. Фитоценотические связи как критерий сохранения редких видов региональной флоры // Бюл. Брян. отд-ния РБО. 2016. № 1(7). С. 10–22. Bulokhov A.D., Semenishchenkov Yu.A., Panasenko N.N., Kharin A.V. Phytocenotic Connections as a Criterion for the Regional Flora Rare Species Conservation. Bulletin of the Bryansk Department of the Russian botanical society, 2016, no. 1(7), pp. 10–22. (In Russ.).
Гнатюк Е.П., Крышень А.М. Методы исследования ценофлор (на примере растительных сообществ вырубок Карелии). Петрозаводск: КарНЦ РАН, 2005. 68 с. Gnatyuk E.P., Kryshen’ A.M. Methods for Investigating Coenofloras (Example of Plant Communities in Harvested Forest Areas in Karelia). Petrozavodsk, KarSC RAS Publ., 2005. 68 p. (In Russ.).
Дидух Я.П. Проблемы активности видов растений // Ботан. журн. 1982. Т. 67, № 7. С. 925–935. Didukh Ya.P. The Problems in the Activity of Plant Species. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 1982. vol. 67, no. 7, pp. 925–935. (In Russ.).
Захаренко А.В. Теоретические основы управления сорным компонентом агрофитоценоза в системах земледелия. М.: МСХА, 2000. 466 с. Zakharenko A.V. Theoretical Foundations for Managing the Agrophytocenosis Weed Component in Farming Systems. Moscow, MSKhA Publ., 2000. 466 p. (In Russ.).
Коновалова И.С., Бабич Н.А., Марич С.Н. Фитоценотическая значимость сорных растений лесных питомников // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2014. № 1. С. 37–44. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/75e/2014_01_lh03.pdf Konovalova I.S., Babich N.A., Marich S.N. Phytocenotic Importance of Weed Plants in Forest Nurseries. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2014, no. 1, pp. 37–44. (In Russ.).
Крышень А.М. Структура и динамика растительного сообщества вейниковой вырубки в Южной Карелии. 1. Видовой состав // Ботан. журн. 2003. Т. 88, № 4. С. 48–62. Kryshen A.M. Structure and Dynamics of Small-Reed Clear-Cutting Community in Southern Karelia. 1. Species Composition. Botanicheskii Zhurnal, 2003, vol. 88, no. 4, pp. 48–62. (In Russ.).
Крышень А.М. Растительные сообщества вырубок Карелии. М.: Наука, 2006. 262 с. Kryshen A.M. Plant Communities of Cuttings in Karelia. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2006. 262 p. (In Russ.).
Крышень А.М. К вопросу о механизмах устойчивости и развития растительных сообществ // Актуал. проблемы геоботаники. III Всерос. шк.-конф. Лекции. Петрозаводск: КарНЦ РАН, 2007. C. 157–175. Kryshen A.M. On the Issue of Mechanisms of Sustainability and Development of Plant Communities. Current Issues of Geobotany. The III All-Russian School-Conference. Lectures. Petrozavodsk, KarSC RAS Publ., 2007, pp. 157–175. (In Russ.).
Миркин Б.М., Наумова Л.Г. Краткий энциклопедический словарь науки о растительности. Уфа: Гилем; Башк. энцикл., 2014. 288 с. Mirkin B.M., Naumova L.G. A Concise Encyclopedic Dictionary of Vegetation Science. Ufa, Gilem, Bashkirskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 2014. 288 p. (In Russ.).
Миркин Б.М., Наумова Л.Г. Введение в современную науку о растительности. М.: ГЕОС, 2017. 280 с. Mirkin B.M., Naumova L.G. Introduction to Modern Vegetation Science. Moscow, GEOS Publ., 2017. 280 p. (In Russ.).
Палкина Т.А. Флористический состав сорного компонента агроценозов на территории Рязанской области // Изв. ТСХА. 2011. Вып. 4. С. 44–55. Palkina T.A. Floristic Composition of the Weed Component of Agrocenoses in the Ryazan Region. Izvestiya of Timiryazev Agricultural Academy, 2011, iss. 4, pp. 44–55. (In Russ.).
Реймерс Н.Ф. Птицы и млекопитающие южной тайги Средней Сибири. М.; Л.: Наука, 1966. 420 с. Reymers N.F. Birds and Mammals of Middle Siberia Southern Taiga. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1966. 420 p. (In Russ.).
Самсонова В.П., Благовещенский Ю.Н., Кондрашкина М.И. Учет и картографирование сорной растительности. М.: Дашков и Кº, 2006. 88 с. Samsonova V.P., Blagoveshchenskiy Yu.N., Kondrashkina M.I. Recording and Mapping of Weed Vegetation. Moscow, Dashkov i Kº Publ., 2006. 88 p. (In Russ.).
Третьякова А.С. Биоэкологическая характеристика сегетальной флоры Среднего Урала // Экология. 2006. № 2. С. 110–115. Tret’yakova A.S. Bioecological Characteristics of Segetal Flora of the Middle Urals. Ekologia = Russian Journal of Ecology, 2006, no. 2, pp. 110–115. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1067413606020056
Уланова Н.Г. Восстановительная динамика растительности сплошных вырубок и массовых ветровалов в ельниках южной тайги (на примере европейской части России): автореф. дис. ... д-ра биол. наук. М., 2006. 46 с. Ulanova N.G. Restorative Dynamics of Vegetation in Clear-Cut Areas and Massive Windthrows in the Southern Taiga Spruce Forests (Case Study of the European Part of Russia): Dr. Biol. Sci. Diss. Abs. Moscow, 2006. 46 p. (In Russ.).
Уланова Н.Г. Механизмы сукцессий растительности сплошных вырубок в ельниках южной тайги // Актуал. проблемы геоботаники. III Всерос. шк.-конф. Лекции. Петрозаводск: КарНЦ РАН, 2007. C. 198–211. Ulanova N.G. Mechanisms of Vegetation Successions in Clear-Cut Areas in the Southern Taiga Spruce Forests. Current Issues of Geobotany. The III All-Russian School-Conference. Lectures. Petrozavodsk, KarSC RAS Publ., 2007, pp. 198–211. (In Russ.).
Шмидт В.М. Флора Архангельской области. СПб.: СПбГУ, 2005. 346 с. Schmidt V.M. Flora of the Arkhangelsk Region. Saint Petersburg, SPbU Publ., 2005. 346 p. (In Russ.).
Begon M., Harper J.L., Townsend C.R. Ecology. Individuals, Populations and Communities. Oxford, Blackwell Science Ltd, 1996. 970 p.
Braun-Blanquet J. Pflanzensoziologie. Wien, Springer-Verlag, 1964. 865 p. (In Ger.). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-8110-2
Grime J.P. Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes, and Ecosystem Properties. Chichester, John Wiley & Sons, 2001. 417 p.
Kimmins J.P. Forest Ecology: A Foundation for Sustainable Forest Management and Environmental Ethics in Forestry. Upper Saddle River, NJ, Prentice Hall, 2004. 701 p.
Palmer M.W. Variation in Species Richness: Towards a Unification of Hypotheses. Folia Geobotanica et Phytotaxonomica, 1994, vol. 29, iss. 4, pp. 511–530. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02883148
Raunkiaer C. The Life Forms of Plants and Statistical Plant Geography. London, Oxford University Press, 1934. 632 p.
