Distribution of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway Maple (Acer platanoides L.) with Height in a Shelterbelt
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2020-6-111-119Keywords:
shelterbelt, Quercus robur L., Acer platanoides L., tree stand, average diameter, arithmetic mean height, valuation mean height, coefficient of skewness, coefficient of kurtosis, Shapiro-Wilk testAbstract
The organizing framework of adaptive landscape agriculture is protective afforestation. The study of the shelterbelt state is necessary for detection of their protective height due to the dramatically changing climatic conditions. The research purpose is to carry out the distribution of trees of English oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway maple (Acer platanoides L.) with height for the stand structure evaluation, as well as to propose the measures for the condition improvement of English oak. The shelterbelt, the spatial structure of which was studied, is located in the vicinity of the village of Zolotarevka (65 km from the city of Lugansk). Archival data on the creation time and age of the studied forest shelterbelt were not revealed. Shelterbelts in the Lugansk region were created in accordance with the “Great Plan for the Transformation of Nature”, which was designed for 1949–1965. Sampling areas were laid out in accordance with the industrial standard OST 56-69–83. The composition of the shelterbelt, the diameter and average height of the trees were determined based on the results of enumerative valuation. The coefficients of skewness and kurtosis of stands of the studied species were calculated by the standard methods of biometrics. The distribution of Norway maple and English oak trees with height was checked with the normal distribution of trees in the plantation according to the Shapiro-Wilk test. The authors revealed that arithmetic and valuation mean heights of the stands of English oak and Norway maple on two permanent sampling areas differ slightly. It was found that the stand of Norway maple on the first and second sampling areas is characterized by positive right-side symmetry and positive kurtosis. Analyzing the stand condition, it is arguable that the coefficient of skewness of the English Oak stand on both areas is not the same in sign and numerical value: on the first sampling area – leftside negative (As = –2.026) and on the second – right-side positive (As = 0.973). The authors pay particular attention to the fact that the value of the coefficient of kurtosis of the English Oak stands is the highest on the first sampling area – 3.044. On the basis of the ShapiroWilk test it is shown that the curve of distribution of the Norway maple stands with height on the first and second sampling areas does not correspond to the normal distribution curve for the plantations. While the curve of distribution of the English Oak stands with height on the second sampling area is close to the indicator of the Shapiro-Wilk test for normal stands and is 0.823 (for p = 0.05, W = 0.842, n = 10).
For citation: Gribacheva O.V., Chernodubov A.I. Distribution of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway Maple (Acer platanoides L.) with Height in a Shelterbelt. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2020, no. 6, pp. 111–119. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2020-6-111-119
Downloads
References
Багинский В.Ф., Лапицкая О.В. Биометрия в лесном хозяйстве: Гомель: ГГУ им. Ф. Скорины, 2011. 416 с. [Baginskiy V.F., Lapitskaya O.V. Biometrics in Forestry. Gomel, GSU Publ., 2011. 416 p.].
Грибачева О.В., Чернодубов А.И., Сотников Д.В. Динамика рангового распределения деревьев по высоте в полезащитной полосе с участием дуба черешчатого и клена остролистного // Лесотехн. журн. 2020. № 1(37). С. 15–25. [Gribacheva O.V., Chernodubov A.I., Sotnikov D.V. Dynamics of Height Range Distribution of Trees in the Forest Shelter Belt with Participation of English Oak (Quercus robur L.) and Norway Maple (Acer platanoides L.). Lesotekhnicheskiy zhurnal [Forestry Engineering Journal], 2020. no. 1(37), pp. 15–25]. DOI: 10.34220/issn.2222-7962/2020.1/2
Доспехов Б.А. Методика полевого опыта (с основами статистической обработки результатов исследований). 5-е изд., перераб. и доп. М.: Агропромиздат, 1985. 351 с. [Dospekhov B.A. Field Experiment Procedure (with the Basics of Statistical Processing of Research Results). Moscow, Agropromizdat Publ., 1985. 351 p.].
Каган Д.И., Ковалевич О.А., Сердюкова К.С. Оценка роста деревьев дуба черешчатого в лесосеменных плантациях Брестского ГПЛХО // Тр. БГТУ. 2015. № 1(174). С. 133–136. [Kogan D.I., Kovalevich O.A., Serdyukova K.S. Assessment of Tree Growth of Pedunculate Oak in Seed Orchards of the Brest State Forestry Production Association. Trudy BGTU [Proceedings of BSTU], 2015, no. 1(174), pp. 133–136].
Лемешко Б.Ю. Критерии проверки отклонения распределения от нормального закона: рук-во по применению. Новосибирск: НГТУ, 2014. 192 с. [Lemeshko B.Yu. Testing Criteria for the Distribution Deviation from the Normal Distribution Law: Application Manual. Novosibirsk, NSTU Publ., 2014. 192 p.].
Лепехин А.А., Петров П.Г. К оценке роста и лесопатологического состояния дуба после изреживания полезащитных лесополос рубками ухода // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 1987. № 4. С. 16–20. [Lepekhin A.A., Petrov P.G. On the Assessment of Growth and Forest Pathology Condition of Oak after Improvement Thinning of Shelter Belts. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 1987, no. 4, pp. 16–20]. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/apxiv/1987/%E2%84%964-1987.pdf
Логгинов Б.И. Агролесомелиоративное районирование Украинской ССР. Киев: Госсельхозиздат УССР, 1991. С. 307–319. [Logginov B.I. Agroforestry Zoning of the Ukrainian SSR. Kiev, Gossel’khozizdat USSR Publ., 1991, pp. 307–319].
ОСТ 56-69–83. Площади пробные лесоустроительные. Метод закладки. М.: ЦБНТИ Гослесхоза, 1984. 50 с. [Industrial Standard. OST 56-69–83. Forest Management Trial Areas. Method of Laying out. Moscow, TsBNTI Gosleskhoza Publ., 1984. 50 p.].
Раменский Л.Г. Введение в комплексное почвенно-геоботаническое исследование земель. М.: Сельхозгиз, 1938. 620 с. [Ramenskiy L.G. Introduction to the Integrated Soil-Geobotanical Research of Lands. Moscow, Selkhozgiz Publ., 1938. 620 p.].
Сауткина М.Ю., Кузнецова Н.Ф., Тунякин В.Д. Современное состояние полезащитных лесных полос с преобладанием дуба черешчатого (Quercus robur L.) в Каменной Степи // Лесохоз. информ. 2018. № 1. С. 78–89. [Sautkina M., Kuznetsova N., Tunjakin V. Current State of Forest Shelter Belts with Predominance of English Oak (Querqus robur L.) of the Stone Steppe. Lesokhozyaystvennaya informatsiya [Forestry information], 2018, no. 1, pp. 78–89]. DOI: 10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2018.1.07
Сортиментные таблицы для таксации молодняков и средневозрастных древостоев / отв. за вып. А.А. Строчинский. Киев: Изд-во УСХА, 1993. 464 с. [Assortment Tables for Valuation of Young and Middle-Aged Stands. Responsible for release A.A. Strochinskiy. Kiev, USKhA Publ., 1993. 464 p.].
Турусов В.И., Лепехин А.А., Чеканышкин А.С. Опыт лесной мелиорации степных ландшафтов. Каменная Степь; Воронеж: Истоки, 2017. 228 с. [Turusov V.I., Lepekhin A.A., Chekanyshkin A.S. Experience in Forest Reclamation of Steppe Landscapes. Voronezh, Istoki Publ., 2017. 228 p.].
Турусов В.И., Чеканышкин А.С., Тищенко В.В., Годунов С.И., Ялманов И.В. Агроэкологическая роль лесных полос в преобразовании ландшафтов. Каменная Степь; М.: Тип. Россельхозакадемии, 2012. 191 с. [Turusov V.I., Chekanyshkin A.S., Tishchenko V.V., Godunov S.I., Yalmanov I.V. Agroecological Role of Forest Belts in Landscape Transformation. Moscow, Tipografiya Rossel’khozakademii, 2012. 191 p.].
Чеканышкин А.С., Лепехин А.А. Состояние защитного лесоразведения в Центрально-Черноземной зоне // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2015. № 4. С. 9–17. [Chekanyshkin A.S., Lepyohin A.A. Condition of Protective Afforestation in Central Black Earth Territories. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2015, no. 4, pp. 9–17]. DOI: 10.17238/issn0536-1036.2015.4.9, URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/03f/chekanishkin_condition_of_ protective_afforestation-.pdf
Чеканышкин А.С., Черенкова Г.П. Об улучшении качества полезащитных лесных полос // Лесн. хоз-во. 2004. № 2. С. 35–36. [Chekanyshkin A.S., Cherenkova G.P. On the Quality Improvement of Shelter Belts. Lesnoye khozyaystvo, 2004, no. 2, рр. 35–36].
Шанин С.С. Строение сосновых и лиственничных древостоев Сибири. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1965. 107 с. [Shanin S.S. The Structure of Pine and Larch Stands in Siberia. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1965. 107 p.].
Bao Y., Li H., Zhao H. Effect of Shelterbelts on Winter Wheat Yields in Sanded Farmland of North-Western Shandong Province, China. Journal of Food, Agriculture and Environment, 2012, vol. 10, iss. 3-4, pp. 1399–1403. DOI: 10.1234/4.2012.3695
Brenner A.J. Microclimatic Modifications in Agroforestry. Tree-Crop Interactions: A Physiological Approach. Ed. by P.A. Huxley, C.K. Ong. Wallingford, CABI, 1996, pp. 159–187.
Burke S. Effect of Shelterbelts on Crop Yields at Rutherglen, Victoria. The Role of Trees in Sustainable Agriculture. Proceedings of a National Conference. Albury, NSW, September 30 – October 3, 1991. Canberra, ACT, 1991, pp. 88–99.
Coates K.D. Tree Recruitment in Gaps of Various Size, Clearcuts and Undisturbed Mixed Forest of Interior British Columbia, Canada. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, vol. 155, iss. 1-3, pp. 387–398. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00574-6
Jackson J.E. Tree and Crop Selection and Management to Optimize Overall System Productivity, Especially Light Utilization, in Agroforestry. Meteorology and Agroforestry. Proceedings of an International Workshop on the Application of Meteorology to Agroforestry Systems Planning and Management, Nairobi, Kenya, February 9–13, 1987. Nairobi, ICRAF, 1989, pp. 163–173.
Magnussen S., Smith V.G., Yeatman C.W. Tree Size, Biomass, and Volume Growth of Twelve 34-Year-Old Ontario Jack Pine Provenances. Canadian Journal of Forest Research, 1985, vol. 15, no. 6, pp. 1129–1136. DOI: 10.1139/x85-183
