Root Nutrition, Photosynthesis, and Net Primary Production in Tree Stands of the genus Picea at the Organism Level within the Range in Russia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-1-38-50Keywords:
Piceа, dry weight of stands, mineral nutrition, photosynthesis, net primary production, organism level, ontogenesis, RussiaAbstract
A complex retrospective ecological and physiological analysis of the tabular data on the dry weight of stands of the genus Picea growing from the Northwest to the Russian Far East was carried out. Ecological and physiological indicators are calculated per an organism (conditional tree of average weight). Biological productivity (BP, times) was determined by the relative increase in the average dry weight of a tree in adjacent age periods. Quantitative data of mineral productivity (MP, mg/m2/per day) were found by the method of VM. Lebedev, and the net productivity of photosynthesis (NPPh, g/m2/per day) was calculated according to A.A. Nichiporovich at the organism level in stands of each age period in the range from 10–30 to 120–210 years. In all regions, there was a decrease in the element uptake by trees with age: nitrogen (N) by 14.9–93.7, phosphorus (P) by 18.7–119.9 and potassium (K) by 15.4–134.4 times. A sharp decrease in the element uptake continued until the age of 50–60 years, after which it stabilized at an extremely low level. The decline in the root uptake activity resulted in a 2.88–14.0 and 1.64–2.60-fold drop in NPPh and BP, respectively. The correlation between N, P and K uptake with NPPH and BP was highly
positive in all zones. Within Russia in 30, 60, 90, and 120-year-old stands differences in the values of net primary production (NPP, g/m2 of nutrition area) reached 5.0, 4.7, 4.6, and 5.2 times, respectively, and net mineral productivity by nitrogen (NMP(N), g/m2 of nutrition area) reached 4.0, 4.3, 4.8, and 4.6 times, respectively. The correlation between these two indicators was described as highly positive. The correlation between the amount of nitrogen uptaken by spruce roots and the efficiency of its use in forming a unit of biomass was highly negative in all regions. The center of the Russian Plain and the Middle Volga region were the best regions for the growth of spruce plants, while the Krasnoyarsk and Khabarovsk (north) Krais were the worst.
For citation: Lebedev V.M., Lebedev E.V., Sorokopudov V.N., Larionov M.V. Root Nutrition, Photosynthesis, and Net Primary Production in Tree Stands of the Genus Picea at the Organism Level Within the Range in Russia. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 1, pp. 38–50. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-1-38-50
Downloads
References
Бабич Н.А., Мерзленко М.Д., Евдокимов И.В. Фитомасса культур сосны и ели в Европейской части России. Архангельск, 2004. 112 с. Babich N.A., Merzlenko M.D., Evdokimov I.V. Phytomass of Pine and Spruce Crops in the European Part of Russia. Arkhangelsk, ASTU Publ., 2004. 112 p. (In Russ.).
Бессчётнов В.П., Лебедев Е.В. Фотосинтез и биологическая продуктивность лесообразующих пород Волго-Вятского региона // Актуальные проблемы лесного хозяйства и рациональное использование ресурсов Нижегородской области. Н. Новгород: НГСХА, 2002. С. 107–116. Besschetnov V.P., Lebedev E.V. Photosynthesis and Biological Productivity of Forest-Forming Species of the Volga-Vyatka Region. Actual Problems of Forestry and Rational Use of Resources of the Nizhny Novgorod Region. Nizhny Novgorod, NNSAA Publ., 2002, pp. 107–116. (In Russ.).
Блинцов И.К., Асютин П.Ф. Закономерности пространственного распределения корневых систем ели и сосны в высокопродуктивных хвойных лесах БССР // Лесоведение и лесное хозяйство. Минск: Высш. шк. 1983. Вып. 18. С. 11–17. Blintsov I.K., Asyutin P.F. Patterns of Spatial Distribution of Spruce and Pine Root Systems in Highly Productive Coniferous Forests of the BSSR. Lesovedeniye i lesnoye khozyaystvo, 1983, iss. 18, pp. 11–17. (In Russ.).
Вараксин Г.С., Поляков В.И., Люминарская М.А. Биологическая продуктивность еловых культур в Средней Сибири // Лесная таксация и лесоустройство. 2006. № 1(36). С. 24–28. Varaksin G.S., Polyakov V.I., Lyuminarskaya M.A. Biological Productivity of Spruce Crops in Central Siberia. Lesnaya taksatsiya i lesoustroystvo, 2006, no. 1(36), pp. 24–28. (In Russ.).
Вахмистров Д.Б., Воронцов В.А. Избирательная способность растений не направлена на обеспечение их максимального роста // Физиология растений. 1997. Т. 44, № 3. С. 404–412. Vakhmistrov D.B., Vorontsov V.A. Plant Selectivity is not Aimed at Maximizing Plant Growth. Fiziologiya rastenij = Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 1997, vol. 44, no. 3, pp. 404–412. (In Russ.).
Географический энциклопедический словарь: Географические названия. М.: Сов. энцикл., 1983. 528 с. Geographical Encyclopedic Dictionary: Geographical Names. Moscow, Sovetskaya entsiklopediya Publ., 1983. 528 p. (In Russ.).
Коновалов В.Н., Зарубина Л.В. Транспорт, распределение и потребление 14С-ассимилятов у сосны и ели в северотаежных фитоценозах при различном световом и азотном питании // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2020. № 4. С. 77–94. Konovalov V.N., Zarubina L.V. Transport, Distribution and Consumption of Pine and Spruce 14C-Assimilates in Northern Phytocenoses Under Different Illumination and Nitrogen Nutrition. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2020, no. 4, pp. 77–94. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2020-4-77-94
Курнаев С.Ф. Лесорастительное районирование СССР. М.: Наука, 1973. 203 с. Kurnaev S.F. Plant Zoning of the USSR. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 1973. 203 p. (In Russ.).
Лавриченко В.М. Соотношение элементов питания в растениях как видовое генотипическое понятие // Вестн. с.-х. науки. 1971. № 7. С. 129–134. Lavrichenko V.M. The Ratio of Nutrients in Plants as a Species Genotypic Concept. Vestnik sel’skokhozyaystvennoy nauki, 1971, no. 7, pp. 129–134. (In Russ.).
Лебедев В.М. Определение активной поверхности и минеральной продуктивности корневой системы плодовых и ягодных культур // Методика исследования и вариационная статистика в научном плодоводстве: сб. докл. междунар. науч.-практ. конф., 25–26 марта 1998 г. Мичуринск: МГСХА,1998. Т. 2. С. 39–42. Lebedev V.M. Determination of the Active Surface and Mineral Productivity of the Root System of Fruit and Berry Crops. Methods of Research and Variation Statistics in Scientific Fruit Growing: Proceedings of the International Scientific Practical Conference, Michurinsk, March 25–26 1998. Vol. 2. Michurinsk, MSAA Publ., 1998, pp. 39–42. (In Russ.).
Лебедев В.М., Лебедев Е.В. Сравнительное определение продуктивности лесных пород // Нетрадиционные и редкие растения, природные соединения и перспективы их использования: VII Междунар. симп., 24–27 мая 2006 г. Белгород: Политерра, 2006. Т. 1. С. 213–216. Lebedev V.M., Lebedev E.V. Comparative Determination of the Forest Species Productivity. Unconventional and Rare Plants, Natural Compounds and Prospects for Their Use: Proceedings of the International Symposium. Belgorod, Politerra Publ., 2006, vol. 1, pp. 213–216. (In Russ.).
Лебедев В.М., Лебедев Е.В. Морфологические, функциональные и физиологические особенности активной части корневой системы лесообразующих пород Волго-Вятского региона // Агрохимия. 2011. № 4. С. 38–44. Lebedev V.M., Lebedev E.V. Morphological, Functional, and Physiological Features of Active Roots of Forest-Forming Species in the Volga-Vyatka Region. Agrohimia = Agricultural Chemistry, 2011, no. 4, pp. 38–44. (In Russ.).
Лебедев Е.В. Влияние густоты насаждения на минеральное питание и биологическую продуктивность ели европейской в ее онтогенезе // Изв. Оренбург. ГАУ. 2012. № 6(38). С. 34–38. Lebedev E.V. Influence of Tree Stand Density on Mineral Nutrition and Biological Productivity of Norway Spruce in Its Ontogenesis. Izvestia Orenburg State Agrarian University, 2012, no. 6(38), pp. 34–38. (In Russ.).
Лебедев Е.В. Биологическая продуктивность и минеральное питание ели европейской в онтогенезе в условиях Северной Европы // Изв. СПбЛТА. 2012. Вып. 199. С. 4–13. Lebedev E.V. Biological Productivity and Mineral Nutrition of Spruce in the Ontogeny in Northern Europe. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj Lesotehniceskoj Akademii, 2012, iss. 199, pp. 4–13. (In Russ.).
Мерзленко М.Д., Шестакова Е.Ю. Биологическая продуктивность искусственных молодняков ели // Науч. тр. МГУЛ. 1992. Вып. 257. С. 38–45. Merzlenko M.D., Shestakova E.Yu. Biological Productivity of Artificial Spruce Young Stands. Nauchnyye trudy MGUL, 1992, iss. 257, pp. 38–45. (In Russ.).
Муромцев И.А. Активная часть корневой системы плодовых растений. М.: Колос, 1969. 247 с. Muromtsev I.A. The Active Part of the Root System of Fruit Plants. Moscow, Kolos Publ., 1969. 247 p. (In Russ.).
Наквасина Е.Н., Демина Н.А. Экологическая стабильность географических рас ели обыкновенной // Вестн. Сев. (Арктич.) федер. ун-та. Сер.: Естеств. науки. 2014. № 2. С. 61–70. Nakvasina E.N., Demina N.A. Ecological Stability of Geographical Races of Spruce. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series “Natural Sciences”, 2014, no. 2, pp. 61–70. (In Russ.).
Ничипорович А.А. О методах учета и изучения фотосинтеза как фактора урожайности // Тр. ИФР АН СССР. 1955. Т. 10. С. 210–249. Nichiporovich A.A. On the Methods of Recording and Studying Photosynthesis as a Yield Factor. Trudy Instituta Fiziologii Rasteniy AN SSSR, 1955, vol. 10, pp. 210–249. (In Russ.).
Потемкин О.Н., Рудиковский А.В., Потемкина О.В. Полиморфизм морфологических характеристик елей подрода Picea (Pinaceae) в восточных районах обитания // Растительный мир Азиатской России. 2012. № 2(10). С. 19–26. Potemkin O.N., Rudikovskiy A.V., Potemkina O.V. Polymorphism of Morphological Characteristics of the Subgenus Picea (Pinaceae) in the Eastern Regions of Habitation. Flora and Vegetation of Asian Russia, 2012, no. 2(10), pp. 19–26. (In Russ.).
Придача В.Б. Соотношение N:P:K как гомеостатический показатель функционального состояния хвойных растений в разных экологических условиях: автореф. дис. … канд. биол. наук. Петрозаводск, 2002. 24 с. Pridacha V.B. The N:P:K Ratio as a Homeostatic Indicator of the Functional State of Coniferous Plants in Different Environmental Conditions: Cand. Biol. Sci. Diss. Abs. Petrozavodsk, 2002. 24 p. (In Russ.).
Суворова Г.Г., Щербатюк Л.С., Янькова Л.С., Копытова Л.Д. Максимальная интенсивность фотосинтеза ели сибирской и лиственницы сибирской в Прибайкалье // Лесоведение. 2003. № 6. С. 58–65. Suvorova G.G., Shcherbatyuk A.S., Yan’kova L.S., Kopytova L.D. Maximal Photosynthesis Intensity in Siberian Spruce and Siberian Larch in Near-Baikal Region. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2003, no. 6, pp. 58–65. (In Russ.).
Усольцев В.А. Фитомасса лесов Северной Евразии: нормативы и элементы географии. Екатеринбург: УрО РАН, 2002. 763 с. Usol’tsev V.A. Phytomass of Northern Eurasia Forests: Standards and Elements of Geography. Yekaterinburg, UB RAS Publ., 2002. 763 p. (In Russ.).
Феклистов П.А., Филиппов Б.Ю., Болотов И.Н., Кононов О.Д., Торбик Д.Н. Экотонные зоны в лесных экосистемах северной тайги // Вестн. Помор. ун-та. Сер.: Естеств. науки. 2011. № 4. С. 102–105. Feklistov P.A., Filippov B.Yu., Bolotov I.N., Kononov O.D., Torbik D.N. Transitive Zones in Wood Ecosystems of Northern Taiga. Vestnik Pomorskogo universiteta of Series “Natural and Exact Sciences”, 2011, no. 4, pp. 102–105. (In Russ.).
Цельникер Ю.Л., Корзухин М.Д., Семёнов С.М. Модельный анализ широтного распределения продуктивности лесных пород России // Лесоведение. 2010. № 2. С. 36–45. Tsel’niker Yu. L., Korzukhin M.L., Semenov S.M. Model Analysis of Latitudinal Distribution of Forest Species in Russia. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2010, no. 2, pp. 36–45. (In Russ.).
Шаньгина Н.П., Феклистов П.А. Индекс поверхности хвои подроста ели под материнским пологом // Экологические проблемы Арктики и северных территорий: межвуз. сб. науч. тр. / отв. ред. П.А. Феклистов. Вып. 14. Архангельск: С(А)ФУ, 2011. С. 33–37. Shan’gina N.P., Feklistov P.A. Needle Surface Area Index of Spruce Undergrowth Under Maternal Canopy. Environmental Problems of the Arctic and Northern Territories: Interuniversity Collection of Academic Papers. Ed. by P.A. Feklistov. Iss. 14. Arkhangelsk, NArFU Publ., 2011, pp. 33–37. (In Russ.).
Begon M., Harper J.L., Townsend C.R. Ecology: Individuals, Populations and Communities. Wiley-Blackwell, 1996. 1068 p.
Dymond C.C., Neilson E.T., Stinson G., Porter K., MacLean D.A., Gray D.R., Campagna M., Kurz W.A. Future Spruce Budworm Outbreak May Create a Carbon Source in Eastern Canadian Forests. Ecosystems, 2010, vol. 13, pp. 917–931. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-010-9364-z
Garcia O. A Parsimonious Dynamic Stand Model for Interior Spruce in British Columbia. Forest Science, 2011, vol. 57, iss. 4, pp. 265–280. https://doi.org/10.1093/forestscience/57.4.265
Hlásny T., Barka I., Roessiger J., Kulla L., Trombik J., Sarvašová Z., Bucha T., Kovalčík M., Čihák T. Conversion of Norway Spruce Forests in the Face of Climate Change: A Case Study in Central Europe. European Journal of Forest Research, 2017, vol. 136, iss. 5-6, pp. 1013–1028. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-017-1028-5
Houle D., Richard P.J.H., Ndzangou S.O., Richer-Laflèche M. Compositional Vegetation Changes and Increased Red Spruce Abundance During the Little Ice Age in a Sugar Maple Forest of North-Eastern North America. Plant Ecology, 2012, vol. 213, iss. 6, pp. 1027–1035. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11258-012-0062-0
Kozak I., Chłódek D., Zawadzki A., Kozak H., Potaczała G. Symulacja przebudowy drzewostanów świerkowych W Bieszczadach za pomocą modelu FORKOME = Conversion Simulation of Spruce Stands in the Bieszczady Mountains with the Aid of FORKOME Model. Leśne Prace Badawcze, 2007, no. 2, pp. 7–26. (In Pol.).
Mund M., Kummetz E., Hein M., Bauer G.A., Schulze E.-D. Growth and Carbon Stocks of a Spruce Forest Chronosequence in Central Europe. Forest Ecology and Management, 2002, vol. 171, iss. 3, pp. 275–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-1127(01)00788-5
O’Connell K.E.B., Gower S.T., Norman J.M. Comparison of Net Primary Production and Light-Use Dynamics of Two Boreal Black Spruce Forest Communities. Ecosystems, 2003, vol. 6, pp. 236–247. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00021510
Pretzsch H., Dieler J., Seifert T., Rötzer T. Climate Effects on Productivity and Resource-Use Efficiency of Norway Spruce (Picea abies [L.] Karst.) and European Beech (Fagus sylvatica [L.]) in Stands with Different Spatial Mixing Patterns. Trees, 2012, vol. 26, pp. 1343–1360. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00468-012-0710-y
Suvorova G.G., Oskorbina M.V., Kopytova L.D., Yan’kova L.S., Popova E.V. Seasonal Changes in Photosynthetic Activity and Chlorophylls in the Scots Pine and Siberian Spruce with Optimal or Insufficient Moistening. Contemporary Problems of Ecology, 2011, vol. 4, iss. 6, pp. 626–633. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1995425511060105
Tange T. Emulating Natural Disturbances: The Role of Silviculture in Creating Even-Aged and Complex Structures in the Black Spruce Boreal Forest of Eastern North America. Journal of Forest Research, 2010, vol. 15, iss. 1, p. 81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10310-009-0178-9
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Е.В. Лебедев, В.М. Лебедев, В.Н. Сорокопудов, М.В. Ларионов (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
