Experience in the Creation of Forest Plantations Using Container Seedlings
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2021-5-192-200Keywords:
Siberian spruce, forest plantations, survival rate of seedlings, linear growth of seedlings, container seedlings, Tomsk regionAbstract
Intensification of forestry requires the use of modern methods of reforestation, which include the introduction of container planting material. The purpose of this work is to evaluate the survival rate and linear growth of spruce container seedlings depending on the planting site location and the agrotechnical tending. The studies were carried out at the test site located in the Tomsk district of the Tomsk region. It was found that many planting containers store not 1 seedling, but 2–4 pcs and therefore approximately the same quantity of seedlings as in the traditional planting of container planting material. It was revealed that the height of 30–35 % of seedlings fails to fulfill the standard values, which was observed, as a rule, in the planting containers with several plants. According to the autumn inventory data, the height of plantations created by planting seedlings in the furrow bottom (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.0001 > 0.05) reliably differs from the height of plantations of “mound” and “untreated soil” options. In terms of height growth, the options “mound side” and “furrow” have the best performance, also significantly different from the options “mound” and “untreated soil” (Kruskal-Wallis test, p = 0.0001 > 0.05). Survival rate below 85 % was observed in the plantings of the following options: “untreated soil”, “furrow bottom”, and “mound” with agrotechnical tending. The 3-fold tending decreased the survival rate of plantations except for planting in the mound side. Thus, the most successful option of planting is planting in the mound side.
For citation: Debkov N.M. Experience in the Creation of Forest Plantations Using Container Seedlings. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2021, no. 5, pp. 192–200. DOI: 10.37482/0536-1036-2021-5-192-200
Downloads
References
Бартенев И.М. К вопросу создания лесных культур посадкой ПМЗК // Лесотехн. журн. 2013. № 2. С. 123–130. Bartenev I.M. On the Question of Creation of Forest Cultures by PMCR Planting. Lesotekhnicheskii zhurnal [Forestry Engineering journal], 2013, no. 2, pp. 123–130.
Жигунов А.В. Теория и практика выращивания посадочного материала с закрытой корневой системой. СПб.: СПбНИИЛХ, 2000. 293 с. Zhigunov A.V. Theory and Practice of Growing Container Seedlings. Saint Petersburg, SPbNIILKh Publ., 2000. 293 p.
Михайлов К.Л. Повышение эффективности лесного хозяйства на основе интенсификации лесопользования и воспроизводства лесов // Экономика природопользования. 2016. № 3. С. 32–40. Mikhailov K.L. Improving the Efficiency of Forestry on the Basis of Intensification. Ekonomika prirodopol’zovaniya, 2016, no. 3, pp. 32–40.
Мочалов Б.А. Подготовка почвы и выбор посадочного места при создании лесных культур сосны из сеянцев с закрытыми корнями // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2014. № 4. С. 9–18. Mochalov B.A. Soil Cultivation and Selection Planting Site Attached to Pine Artificial Stands Creation from Containerized Seedlings. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2014, no. 4, pp. 9–18. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/96f/podgotovka_kornyami.pdf
Мочалов Б.А., Сеньков А.О. Рост сеянцев сосны с закрытыми и открытыми корнями в культурах таежной зоны // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2007. № 4. С. 145–147. Mochalov B.A., Senkov A.O. Growth of Bare-Root and Containerized Pine Seedlings in Cultures of Taiga Zone. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2007, no. 4, pp. 145–147. URL: http://lesnoizhurnal.ru/upload/iblock/9f4/9f4190c8f1354537742045fd5a5cb1ad.pdf
Петухов И.Н. Лесоводственная эффективность создания лесных культур сеянцами с закрытой корневой системой в условиях Костромской области // Вестн. МГУЛ – Лесн. вестн. 2011. № 3. С. 33–36. Petukhov I.N. Silvicultural Efficiency of Planting Forest Plantation Using Containerized Tree Seedling Kostroma Region in the Field. Vestnik Moskovskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta lesa – Lesnoy Vestnik [Forestry Bulletin], 2011, no. 3, pp. 33–36.
Приказ М-ва природных ресурсов и экологии Российской Федерации от 25 марта 2019 г. № 188 «Об утверждении Правил лесовосстановления, состава проекта лесовосстановления, порядка разработки проекта лесовосстановления и внесения в него изменений». Режим доступа: http://docs.cntd.ru/document/554151577 (дата обращения: 3.12.2019 г.). Order of the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation Dated March 25, 2019 No. 188 “On approval of the Rules of Reforestation, the Structure of the Reforestation Project, and the Procedure for Developing the Reforestation Project and Amending It”.
Соколов А.И., Харитонов В.А., Пеккоев А.Н., Кривенко Т.И. Сохранность и рост культур сосны, созданных посадочным материалом с закрытой корневой системой в условиях Карелии // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2015. № 6. С. 46–56. Sokolov A.I., Kharitonov V.A., Pekkoev A.N., Krivenko T.I. Preservation and Growth of Pine Cultivated by Ball-Rooted Planting Stock in Karelia. Lesnoy Zhurnal [Russian Forestry Journal], 2015, no. 6, pp. 46–56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2015.6.46
Ширская М.Н. Культуры кедра сибирского в горных лесах Сибири. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1964. 100 с. Shirskaya M.N. Siberian Pine Plantations in the Mountain Forests of Siberia. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1964. 100 p.
Dumins K., Lazdina D. Forest Regeneration Quality – Factors Affecting First Year Survival of Planted Trees. Research for Rural Development, 2018, vol. 1, pp. 53–58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22616/rrd.24.2018.008
Grossnickle S.C., Folk R.S. Spring versus Summer Spruce Stocktypes of Western Canada: Nursery Development and Field Performance. Western Journal of Applied Forestry, 2003, vol. 18, iss. 4, pp. 267–275. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/wjaf/18.4.267
Hallsby G., Örlander G. A Comparison of Mounding and Inverting to Establish Norway Spruce on Podzolic Soils in Sweden. Forestry, 2004, vol. 77, iss. 2, pp. 107–117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/77.2.107
Heiskanen J., Saksa T., Hyvönen J. Effects of Mounding and Soil Clay Content on Postplanting Success of Norway Spruce. Forest Ecology and Management, 2016, vol. 378, pp. 206–213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2016.07.044
Hubbel K.L., Ross-Davis A.L., Pinto J.R., Burney O.T., Davis A.S. Toward Sustainable Cultivation of Pinus occidentalis Swartz in Haiti: Effects of Alternative Growing Media and Containers on Seedling Growth and Foliar Chemistry. Forests, 2018, vol. 9, iss. 7, art. 422. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/f9070422
Jäärats A., Tullus A. The Effect of Planting Stock and Soil Scarification on Forest Regeneration. Forestry Studies, 2018, vol. 69, iss. 1, pp. 75–85. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/fsmu-2018-0013
Jäärats A., Tullus A., Seemen H. Growth and Survival of Bareroot and Container Plants of Pinus sylvestris and Picea abies during Eight Years in Hemiboreal Estonia. Baltic Forestry, 2016, vol. 22, no. 2(43), pp. 365–374.
Luoranen J. Autumn versus Spring Planting: The Initiation of Root Growth and Subsequent Field Performance of Scots Pine and Norway Spruce Seedlings. Silva Fennica, 2018, vol. 52, no. 2, art. 7813. DOI: https://doi.org/10.14214/sf.7813
Luoranen J., Viiri H. Deep Planting Decreases Risk of Drought Damage and Increases Growth of Norway Spruce Container Seedlings. New Forests, 2016, vol. 47, iss. 5, pp. 701–714. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-016-9539-3
Nzokou P., Cregg B.M. Morphology and Foliar Chemistry of Containerized Abies fraseri (Pursh) Poir. Seedlings as Affected by Water Availability and Nutrition. Annals of Forest Science, 2010, vol. 67, iss. 6, art. 602. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010015
Sutton R.F. Mounding Site Preparation: A Review of European and North American Experience. New Forests, 1993, vol. 7, iss. 2, pp. 151–192. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00034198
