Kinematic Profiles of Human Goal-Directed Actions in Different Social Contexts (Review)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1491-Z120Keywords:
neurophysiological mechanisms of goal-directed actions, cooperative activity, social context, interpersonal coordination, kinematics of human actions, sensorimotor communication, movement velocity, movement trajectoryAbstract
The review analyses studies into the influence of social factors on the kinematic profiles (velocity, amplitude, trajectory, grip aperture and other characteristics) of human actions. Laboratory models of human joint sensorimotor activity in different social contexts are described, exemplified by reach kinematics, complementary actions, sensorimotor communication, imitation tasks and motor interference tasks. Research into the influence of the goals of interaction (cooperation, competition, communication) and the presence of an observer on the kinematic profiles of human movements is analysed. Further, the paper demonstrates the role of social factors in the performance of complementary actions and describes the effect of the mutual influence of the physical requirements of the task and social context on the kinematic profile of movements. Results are presented showing that co-actors modulate their actions to eliminate ambiguity of their motor intentions for the other person (sensorimotor communication). Contextual factors influencing the degree of motor interference and imitative behaviour are described, such as: the type of stimuli observed, co-agent’s status, group membership, and neurotypicality of the subjects. The possibility of reducing the effect of visuomotor interference by presenting incongruent actions as interdependent components of an overall activity plan is shown. In addition, neurophysiological mechanisms of interpersonal coordination are described. It is concluded that findings on human movement patterns in different social contexts can be used to increase teamwork efficiency in various professional fields, rehabilitate people with movement disorders, optimize working conditions, and improve human interactions with robotic systems.
Downloads
References
Albert S., de Ruiter J.P. Improving Human Interaction Research Through Ecological Grounding // Collabra Psychol. 2018. Vol. 4, № 1. Art. № 24. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.132
Ciardo F., Campanini I., Merlo A., Rubichi S., Iani C. The Role of Perspective in Discriminating Between Social and Non-Social Intentions from Reach-to-Grasp Kinematics // Psychol. Res. 2018. Vol. 82, № 5. Р. 915–928. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0868-4
Georgiou I., Becchio C., Glover S., Castiello U. Different Action Patterns for Cooperative and Competitive Behaviour // Cognition. 2007. Vol. 102, № 3. Р. 415–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.008
Krishnan-Barman S., Forbes P.A.G., Hamilton A.F. de C. How Can the Study of Action Kinematics Inform Our Understanding of Human Social Interaction? // Neuropsychologia. 2017. Vol. 105. P. 101–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.018
Becchio C., Sartori L., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. Both Your Intention and Mine Are Reflected in the Kinematics of My Reach-to-Grasp Movement // Cognition. 2008. Vol. 106, № 2. Р. 894–912. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.004
Quesque F., Delevoye-Turrell Y., Coello Y. Facilitation Effect of Observed Motor Deviants in a Cooperative Motor Task: Evidence for Direct Perception of Social Intention in Action // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove). 2016. Vol. 69, № 8. Р. 1451–1463. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1083596
Vesper C., Schmitz L., Safra L., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. The Role of Shared Visual Information for Joint Action Coordination // Cognition. 2016. Vol. 153. P. 118–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.002
Gigliotti M.F., Sampaio A., Bartolo A., Coello Y. The Combined Effects of Motor and Social Goals on the Kinematics of Object-Directed Motor Action // Sci. Rep. 2020. Vol. 10. Art. № 6369. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63314-y
Sartori L., Betti S. Complementary Actions // Front. Psychol. 2015. Vol. 6. Art. № 557. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00557
Curioni A., Knoblich G.K., Sebanz N., Sacheli L.M. The Engaging Nature of Interactive Gestures // PLoS One. 2020. Vol. 15, № 4. Art. № e0232128. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232128
de la Rosa S., Meilinger T., Streuber S., Saulton A., Fademrecht L., Quiros-Ramirez M.A., Bülthoff H., Bülthoff I., Cañal-Bruland R. Visual Appearance Modulates Motor Control in Social Interactions // Acta Psychol. (Amst.). 2020. Vol. 210. Art. № 103168. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103168
Di Bono M.G., Begliomini C., Budisavljevic S., Sartori L., Miotto D., Motta R., Castiello U. Decoding Social Intentions in Human Prehensile Actions: Insights from a Combined Kinematics-fMRI Study // PLoS One. 2017. Vol. 12, № 8. Art. № e0184008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184008
Sartori L., Becchio C., Bara B.G., Castiello U. Does the Intention to Communicate Affect Action Kinematics? // Conscious. Cogn. 2009. Vol. 18, № 3. Р. 766–772. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.06.004
Gianelli C., Scorolli C., Borghi A.M. Acting in Perspective: The Role of Body and Language as Social Tools // Psychol. Res. 2013. Vol. 77, № 1. Р. 40–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0401-0
Fantoni C., Rigutti S., Piccoli V., Sommacal E., Carnaghi A. Faster but Less Careful Prehension in Presence of High, Rather Than Low, Social Status Attendees // PLoS One. 2016. Vol. 11, № 6. Art. № e0158095. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158095
Sartori L., Becchio C., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. Modulation of the Action Control System by Social Intention: Unexpected Social Requests Override Preplanned Action // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2009. Vol. 35, № 5. Р. 1490–1500. DOI: 10.1037/a0015777
Sowden S., Schuster B.A., Keating C.T., Fraser D.S., Cook J.L. The Role of Movement Kinematics in Facial Emotion Expression Production and Recognition // Emotion. 2021. Vol. 21, № 5. Р. 1041–1061. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000835
Schuster B.A., Sowden S.L., Abdlkarim D., Wing A.M., Cook J.L. Acting Is Not the Same as Feeling: Emotion Expression in Gait Is Different for Posed and Induced Emotions // Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2019. Vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2019.229.00010
Agrawal Y., Carlson E., Toiviainen P., Alluri V. Decoding Individual Differences and Musical Preference via Music-Induced Movement // Sci. Rep. 2022. Vol. 12. Art. № 2672. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06466-3
Fink B., André S., Mines J.S., Weege B., Shackelford T.K., Butovskaya M.L. Sex Difference in Attractiveness Perceptions of Strong and Weak Male Walkers // Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2016. Vol. 28, № 6. Р. 913–917. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22891
Weege B., Pham M.N., Shackelford T.K., Fink B. Physical Strength and Dance Attractiveness: Further Evidence for an Association in Men, but Not in Women // Am. J. Hum. Biol. 2015. Vol. 27, № 5. Р. 728–730. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22703
Gallup A.C., Fink B. Handgrip Strength as a Darwinian Fitness Indicator in Men // Front. Psychol. 2018. Vol. 9. Art. № 439. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00439
Hemeren P. Reverse Hierarchy Theory and the Role of Kinematic Information in Semantic Level Processing and Intention Perception. 2019. URL: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-17826 (дата обращения: 13.07.2022).
Trujillo J.P., Simanova I., Bekkering H., Özyürek A. Communicative Intent Modulates Production and Comprehension of Actions and Gestures: A Kinect Study // Cognition. 2018. Vol. 180. P. 38–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.003
McEllin L., Knoblich G., Sebanz N. Distinct Kinematic Markers of Demonstration and Joint Action Coordination? Evidence from Virtual Xylophone Playing // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2018. Vol. 44, № 6. Р. 885–897. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000505
Pezzulo G., Donnarumma F., Dindo H., D’Ausilio A., Konvalinka I., Castelfranchi C. The Body Talks: Sensorimotor Communication and Its Brain and Kinematic Signatures // Phys. Life Rev. 2019. Vol. 28. P. 1–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.014
Schmitz L., Vesper C., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. When Height Carries Weight: Communicating Hidden Object Properties for Joint Action // Cogn. Sci. 2018. Vol. 42, № 6. Р. 2021–2059. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12638
Martel L., Bidet-Ildei C., Coello Y. Anticipating the Terminal Position of an Observed Action: Effect of Kinematic, Structural, and Identity Information // Vis. Cogn. 2011. Vol. 19, № 6. P. 785–798. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2011.587847
De Marco D., Scalona E., Bazzini M.C., Avanzini P., Fabbri-Destro M. Observer-Agent Kinematic Similarity Facilitates Action Intention Decoding // Sci. Rep. 2020. Vol. 10. Art. № 2605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59176-z
Hovaidi-Ardestani M., Caggiano V., Giese M. Neurodynamical Model for the Coupling of Action Perception and Execution // ICANN. 2017. Vol. 10613. Р. 19–26. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68600-4_3
Hayes S.J., Dutoy C.A., Elliott D., Gowen E., Bennett S.J. Atypical Biological Motion Kinematics Are Represented by Complementary Lower-Level and Top-Down Processes During Imitation Learning // Acta Psychol. (Amst.). 2016. Vol. 163. P. 10–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.005
Forbes P.A.G., Hamilton A.F.D.C. Moving Higher and Higher: Imitators’ Movements Are Sensitive to Observed Trajectories Regardless of Action Rationality // Exp. Brain Res. 2017. Vol. 235, № 9. Р. 2741–2753. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5006-4
Forbes P.A.G., Pan X., Hamilton A.F.D.C. Reduced Mimicry to Virtual Reality Avatars in Autism Spectrum Disorder // J. Autism Dev. Disord. 2016. Vol. 46, № 12. Р. 3788–3797. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2930-2
Forbes P.A.G., Wang Y., Hamilton A.F.D.C. STORMy Interactions: Gaze and the Modulation of Mimicry in Adults on the Autism Spectrum // Psychon. Bull. Rev. 2017. Vol. 24, № 2. Р. 529–535. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1136-0
Kilner J.M., Neal A., Weiskopf N., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Evidence of Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Frontal Gyrus // J. Neurosci. 2009. Vol. 29, № 32. P. 10153–10159. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2668-09.2009
Cook J., Swapp D., Pan X., Bianchi-Berthouze N., Blakemore S.-J. Atypical Interference Effect of Action Observation in Autism Spectrum Conditions // Psychol. Med. 2014. Vol. 44, № 4. P. 731–740. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291713001335
Clarke S., McEllin L., Francová A., Székely M., Butterfill S., Michael J. Joint Action Goals Reduce Visuomotor Interference Effects from a Partner’s Incongruent Actions // Sci. Rep. 2019. Vol. 9. Art. № 15414. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52124-6
Kupferberg A., Huber M., Helfer B., Lenz C., Knoll A., Glasauer S. Moving Just Like You: Motor Interference Depends on Similar Motility of Agent and Observer // PLoS One. 2012. Vol. 7, № 6. Art. № e39637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039637
Stanley J., Gowen E., Miall R.C. Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus // J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2007. Vol. 33, № 4. Р. 915–926. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
Caruana N., de Lissa P., McArthur G. Beliefs About Human Agency Influence the Neural Processing of Gaze During Joint Attention // Soc. Neurosci. 2017. Vol. 12, № 2. Р. 194–206. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1160953
van Schaik J.E., Endedijk H.M., Stapel J.C., Hunnius S. Young Children’s Motor Interference Is Influenced by Novel Group Membership // Front. Psychol. 2016. Vol. 7. Art. № 321. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00321
Бернштейн Н.А. Биомеханика и физиология движений: избранные психологические труды. 3-е изд., стер. М.: Моск. психол.-соц. ин-т; Воронеж: МОДЭК, 2008. 687 с.
Koban L., Ramamoorthy A., Konvalinka I. Why Do We Fall into Sync with Others? Interpersonal Synchronization and the Brain’s Optimization Principle // Soc. Neurosci. 2019. Vol. 14, № 1. Р. 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463
Darda K.M., Ramsey R. The Inhibition of Automatic Imitation: A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis of fMRI Studies // Neuroimage. 2019. Vol. 197. P. 320–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.059
Zarka D., Cebolla A.M., Cheron G. Neurones miroirs, substrat neuronal de la compréhension de l’action? // Encephale. 2022. Vol. 48, № 1. Р. 83–91. DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.005
Kourtis D., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. Favouritism in the Motor System: Social Interaction Modulates Action Simulation // Biol. Lett. 2010. Vol. 6, № 6. Р. 758–761. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478
Yoshioka A., Tanabe H.C., Sumiya M., Nakagawa E., Okazaki S., Koike T., Sadato N. Neural Substrates of Shared Visual Experiences: A Hyperscanning fMRI Study // Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci. 2021. Vol. 16, № 12. Р. 1264–1275. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab082
Hamilton A.F. de C. Cognitive Underpinnings of Social Interaction // Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove). 2015. Vol. 68, № 3. Р. 417–432. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.973424
Анохин П.К. Очерки по физиологии функциональных систем. М: Книга по Требованию, 2021. 450 с.
Chen T.L., Ciocarlie M., Cousins S., Grice P.M., Hawkins K., Hsiao K., Kemp C.C., King C.-H., Lazewatsky D.A., Leeper A.E., Nguyen H., Paepcke A., Pantofaru C., Smart W.D., Takayama L. Robots for Humanity: Using Assistive Robotics to Empower People with Disabilities // IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag. 2013. Vol. 20. P. 30–39. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2229950
Levac D.E., Huber M.E., Sternad D. Learning and Transfer of Complex Motor Skills in Virtual Reality: A Perspective Review // J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 2019. Vol. 16, № 1. Art. № 121. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0587-8
References
Albert S., de Ruiter J.P. Improving Human Interaction Research Through Ecological Grounding. Collabra Psychol., 2018, vol. 4, no. 1. Art. no. 24. DOI: 10.1525/collabra.132
Ciardo F., Campanini I., Merlo A., Rubichi S., Iani C. The Role of Perspective in Discriminating Between Social and Non-Social Intentions from Reach-to-Grasp Kinematics. Psychol. Res., 2018, vol. 82, no. 5, pp. 915–928. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-017-0868-4
Georgiou I., Becchio C., Glover S., Castiello U. Different Action Patterns for Cooperative and Competitive Behaviour. Cognition, 2007, vol. 102, no. 3, pp. 415–433. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.008
Krishnan-Barman S., Forbes P.A.G., Hamilton A.F. de C. How Can the Study of Action Kinematics Inform Our Understanding of Human Social Interaction? Neuropsychologia, 2017, vol. 105, рр. 101–110. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.018
Becchio C., Sartori L., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. Both Your Intention and Mine Are Reflected in the Kinematics of My Reach-to-Grasp Movement. Cognition, 2008, vol. 106, no. 2, pp. 894–912. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.05.004
Quesque F., Delevoye-Turrell Y., Coello Y. Facilitation Effect of Observed Motor Deviants in a Cooperative Motor Task: Evidence for Direct Perception of Social Intention in Action. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove), 2016, vol. 69, no. 8, pp. 1451–1463. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2015.1083596
Vesper C., Schmitz L., Safra L., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. The Role of Shared Visual Information for Joint Action Coordination. Cognition, 2016, vol. 153, pp. 118–123. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2016.05.002
Gigliotti M.F., Sampaio A., Bartolo A., Coello Y. The Combined Effects of Motor and Social Goals on the Kinematics of Object-Directed Motor Action. Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10. Art. no. 6369. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-63314-y
Sartori L., Betti S. Complementary Actions. Front. Psychol., 2015, vol. 6. Art. no. 557. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00557
Curioni A., Knoblich G.K., Sebanz N., Sacheli L.M. The Engaging Nature of Interactive Gestures. PLoS One, 2020, vol. 15, no. 4. Art. no. e0232128. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0232128
de la Rosa S., Meilinger T., Streuber S., Saulton A., Fademrecht L., Quiros-Ramirez M.A., Bülthoff H., Bülthoff I., Cañal-Bruland R. Visual Appearance Modulates Motor Control in Social Interactions. Acta Psychol. (Amst.), 2020, vol. 210. Art. no. 103168. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103168
Di Bono M.G., Begliomini C., Budisavljevic S., Sartori L., Miotto D., Motta R., Castiello U. Decoding Social Intentions in Human Prehensile Actions: Insights from a Combined Kinematics-fMRI Study. PLoS One, 2017, vol. 12, no. 8. Art. no. e0184008. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0184008
Sartori L., Becchio C., Bara B.G., Castiello U. Does the Intention to Communicate Affect Action Kinematics? Conscious. Cogn., 2009, vol. 18, no. 3, pp. 766–772. DOI: 10.1016/j.concog.2009.06.004
Gianelli C., Scorolli C., Borghi A.M. Acting in Perspective: The Role of Body and Language as Social Tools. Psychol. Res., 2013, vol. 77, no. 1, pp. 40–52. DOI: 10.1007/s00426-011-0401-0
Fantoni C., Rigutti S., Piccoli V., Sommacal E., Carnaghi A. Faster but Less Careful Prehension in Presence of High, Rather Than Low, Social Status Attendees. PLoS One, 2016, vol. 11, no. 6. Art. no. e0158095. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158095
Sartori L., Becchio C., Bulgheroni M., Castiello U. Modulation of the Action Control System by Social Intention: Unexpected Social Requests Override Preplanned Action. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 2009, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 1490–1500. DOI: 10.1037/a0015777
Sowden S., Schuster B.A., Keating C.T., Fraser D.S., Cook J.L. The Role of Movement Kinematics in Facial Emotion Expression Production and Recognition. Emotion, 2021, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 1041–1061. DOI: 10.1037/emo0000835
Schuster B.A., Sowden S.L., Abdlkarim D., Wing A.M., Cook J.L. Acting Is Not the Same as Feeling: Emotion Expression in Gait Is Different for Posed and Induced Emotions. Front. Hum. Neurosci., 2019, vol. 13. DOI: 10.3389/conf.fnhum.2019.229.00010
Agrawal Y., Carlson E., Toiviainen P., Alluri V. Decoding Individual Differences and Musical Preference via Music-Induced Movement. Sci. Rep., 2022, vol. 12. Art. no. 2672. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-06466-3
Fink B., André S., Mines J.S., Weege B., Shackelford T.K., Butovskaya M.L. Sex Difference in Attractiveness Perceptions of Strong and Weak Male Walkers. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2016, vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 913–917. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22891
Weege B., Pham M.N., Shackelford T.K., Fink B. Physical Strength and Dance Attractiveness: Further Evidence for an Association in Men, but Not in Women. Am. J. Hum. Biol., 2015, vol. 27, no. 5, pp. 728–730. DOI: 10.1002/ajhb.22703
Gallup A.C., Fink B. Handgrip Strength as a Darwinian Fitness Indicator in Men. Front. Psychol., 2018, vol. 9. Art. no. 439. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00439
Hemeren P. Reverse Hierarchy Theory and the Role of Kinematic Information in Semantic Level Processing and Intention Perception. 2019. Available at: http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:his:diva-17826 (accessed: 13 July 2022).
Trujillo J.P., Simanova I., Bekkering H., Özyürek A. Communicative Intent Modulates Production and Comprehension of Actions and Gestures: A Kinect Study. Cognition, 2018, vol. 180, pp. 38–51. DOI: 10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.003
McEllin L., Knoblich G., Sebanz N. Distinct Kinematic Markers of Demonstration and Joint Action Coordination? Evidence from Virtual Xylophone Playing. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 2018, vol. 44, no. 6, pp. 885–897. DOI: 10.1037/xhp0000505
Pezzulo G., Donnarumma F., Dindo H., D’Ausilio A., Konvalinka I., Castelfranchi C. The Body Talks: Sensorimotor Communication and Its Brain and Kinematic Signatures. Phys. Life Rev., 2019, vol. 28, pp. 1–21. DOI: 10.1016/j.plrev.2018.06.014
Schmitz L., Vesper C., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. When Height Carries Weight: Communicating Hidden Object Properties for Joint Action. Cogn. Sci., 2018, vol. 42, no. 6, pp. 2021–2059. DOI: 10.1111/cogs.12638
Martel L., Bidet-Ildei C., Coello Y. Anticipating the Terminal Position of an Observed Action: Effect of Kinematic, Structural, and Identity Information. Vis. Cogn., 2011, vol. 19, no. 6, pp. 785–798. DOI: 10.1080/13506285.2011.587847
De Marco D., Scalona E., Bazzini M.C., Avanzini P., Fabbri-Destro M. Observer-Agent Kinematic Similarity Facilitates Action Intention Decoding. Sci. Rep., 2020, vol. 10. Art. no. 2605. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-59176-z
Hovaidi-Ardestani M., Caggiano V., Giese M. Neurodynamical Model for the Coupling of Action Perception and Execution. ICANN, 2017, vol. 10613, pp. 19–26. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-68600-4_3
Hayes S.J., Dutoy C.A., Elliott D., Gowen E., Bennett S.J. Atypical Biological Motion Kinematics Are Represented by Complementary Lower-Level and Top-Down Processes During Imitation Learning. Acta Psychol. (Amst.), 2016, vol. 163, pp. 10–16. DOI: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2015.10.005
Forbes P.A.G., Hamilton A.F.D.C. Moving Higher and Higher: Imitators’ Movements Are Sensitive to Observed Trajectories Regardless of Action Rationality. Exp. Brain Res., 2017, vol. 235, no. 9, pp. 2741–2753. DOI: 10.1007/s00221-017-5006-4
Forbes P.A.G., Pan X., Hamilton A.F.D.C. Reduced Mimicry to Virtual Reality Avatars in Autism Spectrum Disorder. J. Autism Dev. Disord., 2016, vol. 46, no. 12, pp. 3788–3797. DOI: 10.1007/s10803-016-2930-2
Forbes P.A.G., Wang Y., Hamilton A.F.D.C. STORMy Interactions: Gaze and the Modulation of Mimicry in Adults on the Autism Spectrum. Psychon. Bull. Rev., 2017, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 529–535. DOI: 10.3758/s13423-016-1136-0
Kilner J.M., Neal A., Weiskopf N., Friston K.J., Frith C.D. Evidence of Mirror Neurons in Human Inferior Frontal Gyrus. J. Neurosci., 2009, vol. 29, no. 32, pp. 10153–10159. DOI: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.2668-09.2009
Cook J., Swapp D., Pan X., Bianchi-Berthouze N., Blakemore S.-J. Atypical Interference Effect of Action Observation in Autism Spectrum Conditions. Psychol. Med., 2014, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 731–740. DOI: 10.1017/S0033291713001335
Clarke S., McEllin L., Francová A., Székely M., Butterfill S., Michael J. Joint Action Goals Reduce Visuomotor Interference Effects from a Partner’s Incongruent Actions. Sci. Rep., 2019, vol. 9. Art. no. 15414. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-52124-6
Kupferberg A., Huber M., Helfer B., Lenz C., Knoll A., Glasauer S. Moving Just Like You: Motor Interference Depends on Similar Motility of Agent and Observer. PLoS One, 2012, vol. 7, no. 6. Art. no. e39637. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0039637
Stanley J., Gowen E., Miall R.C. Effects of Agency on Movement Interference During Observation of a Moving Dot Stimulus. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform., 2007, vol. 33, no. 4, pp. 915–926. DOI: 10.1037/0096-1523.33.4.915
Caruana N., de Lissa P., McArthur G. Beliefs About Human Agency Influence the Neural Processing of Gaze During Joint Attention. Soc. Neurosci., 2017, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 194–206. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2016.1160953
van Schaik J.E., Endedijk H.M., Stapel J.C., Hunnius S. Young Children’s Motor Interference Is Influenced by Novel Group Membership. Front. Psychol., 2016, vol. 7. Art. no. 321. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00321
Bernshteyn N.A. Biomekhanika i fiziologiya dvizheniy: izbrannye psikhologicheskie trudy [Biomechanics and Physiology of Movement: Selected Works on Psychology]. Moscow, 2008. 687 p.
Koban L., Ramamoorthy A., Konvalinka I. Why Do We Fall into Sync with Others? Interpersonal Synchronization and the Brain’s Optimization Principle. Soc. Neurosci., 2019, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 1–9. DOI: 10.1080/17470919.2017.1400463
Darda K.M., Ramsey R. The Inhibition of Automatic Imitation: A Meta-Analysis and Synthesis of fMRI Studies. Neuroimage, 2019, vol. 197, pp. 320–329. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.04.059
Zarka D., Cebolla A.M., Cheron G. Mirror Neurons, Neural Substrate of Action Understanding? Encephale, 2022, vol. 48, no. 1, pp. 83–91 (in Fr.). DOI: 10.1016/j.encep.2021.06.005
Kourtis D., Sebanz N., Knoblich G. Favouritism in the Motor System: Social Interaction Modulates Action Simulation. Biol. Lett., 2010, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 758–761. DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2010.0478
Yoshioka A., Tanabe H.C., Sumiya M., Nakagawa E., Okazaki S., Koike T., Sadato N. Neural Substrates of Shared Visual Experiences: A Hyperscanning fMRI Study. Soc. Cogn. Affect. Neurosci., 2021, vol. 16, no. 12, pp. 1264–1275. DOI: 10.1093/scan/nsab082
Hamilton A.F. de C. Cognitive Underpinnings of Social Interaction. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. (Hove), 2015, vol. 68, no. 3, pp. 417–432. DOI: 10.1080/17470218.2014.973424
Anokhin P.K. Ocherki po fiziologii funktsional’nykh sistem [Essays on the Physiology of Functional Systems]. Moscow, 2021. 450 p.
Chen T.L., Ciocarlie M., Cousins S., Grice P.M., Hawkins K., Hsiao K., Kemp C.C., King C.-H., Lazewatsky D.A., Leeper A.E., Nguyen H., Paepcke A., Pantofaru C., Smart W.D., Takayama L. Robots for Humanity: Using Assistive Robotics to Empower People with Disabilities. IEEE Robotics Autom. Mag., 2013, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 30–39. DOI: 10.1109/MRA.2012.2229950
Levac D.E., Huber M.E., Sternad D. Learning and Transfer of Complex Motor Skills in Virtual Reality: A Perspective Review. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil., 2019, vol. 16, no. 1. Art. no. 121. DOI: 10.1186/s12984-019-0587-8
