Functional Indicators of the Quality of Life of Students in the City of Tyumen
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1491-Z150Keywords:
quality of life, technical college students, student health, SF-36 questionnaire, physical health, mental health, lifestyleAbstract
Ideas about the quality of life develop in accordance with the tasks of research practice, and there is no unambiguous interpretation of this phenomenon. In medicine, clinical studies on patients’ quality of life are widely represented. However, the question of the quality of life in young healthy respondents remains open and relevant. The purpose of this research was to study the quality of life of healthy male and female students of a technical college. Materials and methods. The study involved 68 female and 55 male subjects studying at the Multidisciplinary College, Industrial University of Tyumen. Their quality of life was assessed according to the processed results of the SF-36 questionnaire. Results. In all groups of subjects, physical functioning had the highest score among other physical indicators of the quality of life. No significant gender-related differences were revealed. The rest of the indicators were 15–26 % lower compared with the maximum score. With regard to mental health indicators, social functioning had the highest score, although it was 19 % lower than the maximum score; the other indicators were 21–31 % lower as well. The study revealed age-related changes in quality-of-life indicators of students. At the moment, there is no information available on the reasons why at 18 years of age all the scores decrease, with the exception of role functioning. This remains to be clarified in the longitudinal study that is now being conducted at the university. Based on the survey data, we point out several reasons behind the reduction in students’ adaptive capabilities: imbalanced diet, positive attitude towards alcohol, and positive attitude towards smoking. Only 11 female and 2 male respondents maintain a healthy lifestyle; the majority of the subjects tend to decrease their motor activity during the academic year.
Downloads
References
Шубочкина Е.И., Иванов В.Ю., Блинова Е.Г., Новикова И.И., Янушанец О.И., Петрова Е.А. Региональные особенности жизнедеятельности и здоровья учащихся подросткового возраста (по данным многоцентровых исследований) // Здоровье населения и среда обитания – ЗНиСО. 2018. № 8(305). С. 47–50. DOI: 10.35627/2219-5238/2018-305-8-47-50
Forsberg H., Carlerby H., Norstrand A., Risberg A., Kostenius C. Positive Self-Reported Health Might Be an Important Determinant of Student’s Experiences of High School in Northern Sweden // Int. J. Circumpolar Health. 2019. Vol. 78, № 1. Art. № 1598758. DOI: 10.1080/22423982.2019.1598758
Wu X.Y., Han L.H., Zhang J.H., Luo S., Hu J.W., Sun K. The Influence of Physical Activity, Sedentary Behavior on Health-Related Quality of Life Among the General Population of Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review // PloS One. 2017. Vol. 12, № 11. Art. № e0187668. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0187668
Косинский П.Д., Бондарев Н.С., Бондарева Г.С. Качество среды обитания и ее влияние на качество жизни населения региона // Фундам. исследования. 2017. № 8-1. С. 180–184. URL: https://fundamental-research.ru/ru/article/view?id=41643 (дата обращения: 12.03.2019).
Шкарин В.В., Латышевская Н.И., Зуб А.В., Левченко Н.В., Давыденко Л.А., Беляева А.В. Гендерные аспекты качества жизни студентов медицинского колледжа // Санитар. врач. 2022. № 10. С. 759–766. DOI: 10.33920/med-08-2210-05
Кучма В.Р., Шубочкина Е.И., Иванов В.Ю., Ибрагимова Е.М. Качество жизни и медико-социальные особенности российских подростков, обучающихся в разных образовательных учреждениях // Бюл. Вост.-Сиб. науч. центра Сиб. отд-ния РАМН. 2013. № 3-1(91). С. 75–80.
Oztasan N., Ozyrek P., Kilic I. Factors Associated with Health-Related Quality of Life Among University Students in Turkey // Mater. Sociomed. 2016. Vol. 28, № 3. P. 210–214. DOI: 10.5455/msm.2016.28.210-214
Агаджанян Н.А., Радыш И.В. Качество и образ жизни студенческой молодежи // Экология человека. 2009. № 5. С. 3–8.
Bortes C., Ragnarsson S., Strandh M., Petersen S. The Bidirectional Relationship Between Subjective Well-Being and Academic Achievement in Adolescence // J. Youth Adolesc. 2021. Vol. 50, № 5. P. 992–1002. DOI: 10.1007/s10964-021-01413-3
Лопацкая Ж.Н., Поборский А.Н., Юрина М.А. Показатели качества жизни студентов медицинского института с разным уровнем тревожности // Вестн. СурГУ. Медицина. 2018. № 2(36). С. 69–73.
Ware J.E. Measuring Patients’ Views: The Optimum Outcome Measure: SF 36: A Valid, Reliable Assessment of Health from the Patient’s Point of View // BMJ. 1993. Vol. 306. P. 1429–1430.
Агаджанян Н.А., Макарова И.И., Аксенова А.В., Страхов К.А. Качество жизни студентов Тверского медицинского колледжа // Экология человека. 2014. № 7. С. 3–9.
Алексеева Е.А. Особенности качества жизни подростков, обучающихся в образовательных учреждениях г. Пскова // Анализ риска здоровью. 2015. № 4. С. 91–96.