The Condition of Woody Plants at the Sites of Protective Afforestation and Landscaping of the Kalachevsky District, Volgograd Region
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-58-72Keywords:
trees, shrubs, use of trees and shrubs in plantations, assortment of trees and shrubs, landscaping, protective afforestation, Volgograd regionAbstract
The Kalachevsky district of the Volgograd region belongs to the regions that require stabilization of natural resources use. Land and forest reclamation and landscaping will ensure the resource potential of the district’s landscapes at increasing recreational and natural load. The studies have shown that differences in inventory parameters, development, fruiting and sustainability of plants are due to soil and climatic conditions, and anthropogenic impact. The research objects are woody species, predominantly of European habitats: sweet chestnut – Castanea sativa Mill.; Pallas pine (Crimean pine) – Pinus pallasiana D. Don.; European crab apple – Malus sylvéstris Mill.; white poplar (silver poplar) – Populus alba L.; white willow – Salix alba L.; English oak – Quercus robur L.; European ash – Fraxinus excelsior L.; Lombardy poplar – Populus nigra var. italica Münchh.; wych elm – Ulmus glabra Huds.; golden currant – Ribes aureum Pursh.; common lilac – Syringa vulgaris L.; Russian pea shrub – Caragana frutex (L.) K. Koch; common privet – Ligustrum vilgare L.; Oregon grape – Mahonia aquifolium (Pursh.) Nutt.; cinnamon rose – Rosa cinnamomea L. It was found that relatively stable species in the Kalachevsky district are European crab apple, golden currant (which has the best salinity resistance), Russian pea shrub, wych elm, Oregon grape, but they are inferior to poplars, willows, lilacs, chestnuts in inventory parameters and growth rate. The best performance on a number of economically valuable features were observed in chestnut, spruce, apple, poplar, willow, elm, ash, and rose. Chestnut, currant, Oregon grape, lilac, privet, cinnamon rose have the highest score of ornamentality for landscaping plantations. Chestnut, rose, and oak have the best fruiting rates; ash and privet have medium fruiting rates. The strongest stage of recreational digression is observed in areas remote from settlements: there is densification of plantings, lack of sanitary cuttings, medium passability. Areas near water sources, as well as public gardens and parks, require sanitary care, reduction of recreational pressure and the selection of species from the recommended range of trees and shrubs. In order to ensure the greatest sustainability of plantings and obtain a rapid silvicultural effect, perennial, fast-growing species as well as fruit shrubs recommended in the basic assortment should be included in the protective and landscaping plantations of the arid region.
Acknowledgments: The work was carried out within the topic of the State Assignment No. 0713-2019-0009 “Theoretical Foundations, Development of New Competitive Crop Biotypes with High Rates of Productivity, Quality, Sustainability and Varietal Technologies Based on the Latest Methods and Technological Solutions in a Changing Climate”.
For citation: Solomentseva A.S. The Condition of Woody Plants at the Sites of Protective Afforestation and Landscaping of the Kalachevsky District, Volgograd Region. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2022, no. 5, pp. 58–72. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2022-5-58-72
Downloads
References
Абакумова Л.И., Барабанов А.Т., Белицкая М.Н. и др. Агролесомелиорация / под ред. А.Л. Иванова, К.Н. Кулика. 5-е изд., перераб. и доп. Волгоград: ВНИАЛМИ, 2006. 746 с. Abakumova L.I., Barabanov A.T., Belitskaya M.N. et al. Land and Forest Reclamation. Ed. by А.L. Ivanov, K.N. Kulik. Volgograd, VNIALMI Publ., 2006. 746 p. (In Russ.).
Абышева Л.Н., Буданцев А.Л., Лесиовская Е.Е. и др. Дикорастущие полезные растения России. СПб.: СПХФА, 2001. 663 с. Abysheva L.N., Budantsev A.L., Lesiovskaya E.E. et. al. Wild Useful Plants of Russia. Saint Petersburg, SPKhFA Publ., 2001. 663 p. (In Russ.).
Варданян Ж.А. Методологические аспекты оценки декоративности древесных растений // Докл. Нац. акад. наук Армении. 2017. Т. 117, № 4. С. 340–349. Vardanyan J.A. Methodological Aspects of Assessing the Decorative Value of woody Plants. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of Armenia, 2017, vol. 117, no. 4, pp. 340–349. (In Russ.).
Гордеев А.В., Клещенко А.Д., Черняков Б.А., Сиротенко О.Д. Биоклиматический потенциал России: теория и практика. М.: Т-во науч. изд. КМК, 2006. 512 с. Gordeev A.V., Kleshchenko A.D., Chernyakov B.A., Sirotenko O.D. Bioclimatic Potential of Russia: Theory and Practice. Moscow, KMK Publ., 2006. 512 p. (In Russ.).
Залесов С.В., Платонов Е.П., Залесова Е.С., Оплетаев А.С., Данчева А.В., Крекова Я.А. Изучение перспективности древесных интродуцентов. Екатеринбург: УГЛТУ, 2014. 13 с. Zalesov S.V., Platonov E.P., Zalesova E.S., Opletaev A.S., Dancheva A.V., Krekova Ya.A. Studying the Prospects of Woody Introduced Species. Yekaterinburg, USFEU Publ., 2014. 13 p. (In Russ.).
Иваненко Б.И. Фенология древесных и кустарниковых пород. М.: Сельхозиздат, 1962. 184 с. Ivanenko B.I. Phenology of Tree and Shrub Species. Moscow, Sel’khozizdat Publ., 1962. 184 p. (In Russ.).
Кулик К.Н., Дубенок Н.Н., Рулев А.С., Пугачева А.М. ВНИАЛМИ – лидер агролесомелиоративной науки России: современная концепция защитного лесоразведения // Вестн. Волгогр. гос. ун-та. Сер. 11: Естеств. науки. 2015. № 3(13). С. 108–114. Kulik K.N., Dubenok N.N., Rulev A.S., Pugacheva A.M. All-Russian Scientific Research Amelioration Institute – the Leader of the Russian Agroforestry Science: The Modern Concept of Protective Afforestation. Science of VolSU. Natural sciences, 2015, vol. 3(13), pp. 108–114. (In Russ.).
Лесохозяйственный регламент Калачеевского лесничества Воронежской области. Приложение к приказу управления лесного хозяйства Воронежской области от 3 сент. 2018 г. № 850. Воронеж, 2019. 242 с. Режим доступа: https://www.garant.ru/ doc/1224948/ (дата обращения: 29.08.22). Forestry Regulations of the Kalachevsky Forest District. Voronezh, 2019. 242 p. (In Russ.).
Лотова Л.И. Ботаника. Морфология и анатомия высших растений. М.: КомКнига, 2007. 512 с. Lotova L.I. Botany. Morphology and Anatomy of Higher Plants. Moscow, KomKniga Publ., 2007. 512 p. (In Russ.).
Михин В.И. Лесомелиорация ладшафтов: моногр. Воронеж: ВГЛТА, 2006. 127 с. Mikhin V.I. Forest Reclamation of Landscapes: Monograph. Voronezh, VGLTA Publ., 2006. 127 p. (In Russ.).
Николаев В.А., Авессаломова И.А., Чижова В.П. Природно-антропогенные ландшафты: городские, рекреационные, садово-парковые. М.: Геогр. фак. МГУ, 2011. 112 с. Nikolaev V.A., Avessalomova I.A., Chizhova V.P. Natural and Anthropogenic Landscapes: Urban, Recreational, Garden and Park. Moscow, MSU Publ., 2011. 112 p. (In Russ.).
Рысин Л.П., Рысин С.Л. Методика оценки последствий рекреационного лесопользования // Лесн. вестн. 2000. № 6. С. 56–59. Rysin L.P., Rysin S.L. Methodology for Assessing the Effects of Recreational Forest Management. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2000, no. 6, pp. 56–59. (In Russ.).
Савельева Л.С. Устойчивость деревьев и кустарников в защитных лесных насаждениях. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1975. 168 с. Savel’eva L.S. Stability of Trees and Shrubs in Protective Forest Plantations. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1975. 168 p. (In Russ.).
Стратегия развития защитного лесоразведения в Российской Федерации до 2025 года. Волгоград: ВНИАЛМИ, 2015. 35 с. Strategy for the Development of Protective Afforestation in the Russian Federation until 2025. Volgograd, VNIALMI Publ., 2015. 35 p. (In Russ.).
Borrelli P., Modugno S., Panagos P., Marchetti M., Schütt B., Montanarella L. Detection of Harvested Forest Areas in Italy Using Landsat Imagery. Applied Geography, 2014, vol. 48, pp. 102–111. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2014.01.005
Edwards D.M., Jay M., Jensen F.S., Lucas B., Marzano M., Montagné C., Peace A., Weiss G. Public Preferences across Europe for Different Forest Stand Types as Sites for Recreation. Ecology and Society, 2012, vol. 17, no. 1, art. 27. https://doi.org/10.5751/ ES-04520-170127
Laarman J.G., Sedjo R.A. Global Forests. New York, McGraw Hill College, 1992. 337 p.
Mansourian S., Vallauri D., Dudley N. Forest Restoration in Landscapes. New York, Springer, 2005. 438 p. https://doi.org/10.1007/0-387-29112-1
Martynova M., Sultanova R., Khanov D., Talipov E., Sazgutdinova R. Forest Management Based on the Principles of Multifunctional Forest Use. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2020, vol. 40, iss. 1, pp. 32–46. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2020.1734025
Richardson S.D. Forests and Forestry in China. Washington D.C., Island Press, 1990. 352 p.
Stritzke S. Seltene Obstarten im Garten. Berlin, VEB Deutscher Landwirtschaftsverlag, 1973. 88 S. (In Ger.).
