The Model of Birch-Spruce Plantations Formation in the Conditions of the Russian Plain Southern Taiga
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2024-3-23-45Keywords:
southern taiga, birch forests, subcanopy spruce population, birch-spruce plantation, stand growth, age stages, stand formation modelAbstract
The results of 30 years or research on the formation and growth of birch forests from the subcanopy spruce population in the conditions of the Russian Plain southern taiga are presented. The studies have been carried out on 19 permanent sample plots (PSPs). They were laid in regionally representative sorrel-blueberry birch forests aged 15–115 years with high density and productivity. The birch plantations on the PSPs belong to the same natural age series. The majority of spruce trees appeared under the canopy of birch forests up to 40 years old. As the birch trees aged, the age structure of spruce trees changed from even-aged to conditionally even-aged. Based on the study of the dynamics of the number of trees, the vertical structure of stands, the growing stock and the total stem wood stock, the age stages of development of the spruce population in the birch forests up to 120 years old have been determined. They are regeneration, young growth, polewood and maturation. The end of the maturation stage occurs at the birch tree age of 120 years. At the same time, the average spruce tree age in the first and second layers is 90 years. The duration of the stages varies from 10 years (the young growth stage) to 40 years (the regeneration and maturation stages). To determine the time of onset and end of other age stages of the subcanopy spruce population, the studies in birch forests older than 120 years are needed. The work performed has made it possible to propose a model of the joint formation of birch forests and the subcanopy spruce population, in which the main taxation characteristics are given for all elements of the stand: age, number of trees, the sum of the cross-section of the stems, the stock of the growing and dead wood, as well as total productivity. According to the model, by the age of a birch of 120 years, the total productivity of modal plantations will be about 950 m3/ha and the growing stock of the stand will be about 490 m3/ha. The share of spruce wood will be 28 % or about 150 m3/ha. After the birch forest decay, a low-density spruce forest of the 3rd quality class can form in its place.
Downloads
References
Абатуров А.В., Меланхолин П.Н. Естественная динамика леса на постоянных пробных площадях в Подмосковье. Тула: Гриф и К, 2004. 336 с. Abaturov A.V., Melankholin P.N. Natural Dynamics of the Forest on Permanent Sample Plots in the Moscow Region. Tula, Grif and K. Publ., 2004. 336 p. (In Russ.).
Белов С.В. Лесоводство. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1983. 352 с. Belov S.V. Silviculture. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1983. 352 p.
Березовская Ф.С., Карев Г.П., Швиденко А.З. Моделирование динамики древостоев: Эколого-физиологический подход. М.: ВНИИЦлесресурс, 1991. 84 с. Berezovskaya F.S., Karev G.P., Shvidenko A.Z. Modeling the Dynamics of Forest Stands: Ecological and Physiological Approach. Moscow, All-Russian Research Centre Lesresurs, 1991. 84 p. (In Russ.).
Бельков В.А. Модель развития елово-широколиственного леса на примере брянского лесного массива // Лесоведение. 2010. № 3. С. 32–41. Bel’kov V.A. A Development Model for Spruse-Broad-Leaved Forest (the Watershed Part of the Bryansk Forest as an Example). Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2010, no. 3, pp. 32–41. (In Russ.).
Брацун Д.А., Колесников А.К., Люшнин А.В., Шкараба Е.М. Моделирование пространственно-временной динамики лесного массива // Вестн. Перм. ун-та. Математика. Механика. Информатика. 2009. Вып. 3(29). С. 24–31. Bratsun D.A., Kolesnikov A.K., Lyushnin A.V., Shkaraba E.M. Modeling the Spatiotemporal Dynamics of a Forest Area. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Matematika. Mekhanika. Informatika = Bulletin of Perm University. Mathematics. Mechanics. Computer Science, 2009, iss. 3(29), pp. 24–31. (In Russ.).
Грабарник П.Я., Шанин В.Н., Чертов О.Г., Припутина И.В., Быховец С.С., Петропавловский Б.С., Фролов П.В., Зубкова Е.В., Шашков М.П., Фролова Г.Г. Моделирование динамики лесных экосистем как инструмент прогнозирования и управления лесами // Лесоведение. 2019. № 6. С. 488–500. Grabarnik P.Ya., Shanin V.N., Chertov O.G., Priputina I.V., Bykhovets S.S., Petropavlovskii B.S., Frolov P.V., Zubkova E.V., Shashkov M.P., Frolova G.G. Modeling of Forest Ecosystem Dynamics: an Instrument for Forest Prediction and Management. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2019, no. 6, pp. 488–500. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0024114819030033
Грязькин А.В. Возобновительный потенциал таежных лесов (на примере ельников Северо-Запада России). СПб.: СПбГЛТА, 2001. 185 с. Gryazkin A.V. Regeneration Potential of Taiga Forests (by the Example of Spruce Forests of Northwest Russia). St. Petersburg, Ministry of Education of the Russian Federation, St. Petersburg State Forestry Engineering Academy, 2001. 185 p. (In Russ.).
Дебков Н.М., Грязькин А.В., Ковалев Н.В. Состояние предварительного возобновления под пологом березняков средней тайги в условиях Томской области // Леса России и хоз-во в них. 2015. № 1(52). С. 24–32. Debkov N.M., Gryazkin A.V., Kovalev N.V. The State of Regeneration under the Canopy of Birch Forests in the Middle Taiga Conditions of Tomsk Region. Lesa Rossii i khozyajstvo v nikh = Forests of Russia and Economy in Them, 2015, no. 1(52), pp. 24–32. (In Russ.).
Дерюгин А.А., Глазунов Ю.Б. Функциональные связи морфометрических характеристик деревьев ели подпологовой популяции в березняках южной тайги // Лесохоз. информ. 2021. № 2. С. 20–28. Deryugin A.A., Glazunov Yu.B. Functional Connections of Morphometric Characteristics of Spruce Trees of the Sub-Canopy Population in Birch Forests of the Southern Taiga. Lesokhozyaystvennaya informatsiya = Forestry Information, 2021, no. 2, pp. 20–28. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.24419/LHI.2304-3083.2021.2.02
Зарубина Л.В. Состояние естественного возобновления ели в мелколиственных лесах на севере России // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2016. № 3. С. 52–65. Zarubina L.V. Natural Regeneration of Spruce in the Small-Leaved Forests in the North of Russia. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2016, no. 3, pp. 52–65. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.17238/issn0536-1036.2016.3.52
Исаев А.С., Суховольский В.Г., Хлебопрос Р.Г., Бузыкин А.И., Овчинникова Т.М. Моделирование лесообразовательного процесса: феноменологический подход // Лесоведение. 2005. № 1. С. 3–11. Isaev A.S., Sukhovol’skii V.G., Khlebopros R.G., Buzykin A.I., Ovchinnikova T.M. Modeling of the Forest-Forming Process: Phenomenology Approach. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2005, no. 1, pp. 3–11. (In Russ.).
Колесников Б.П. Генетический этап в лесной типологии и его задачи // Лесоведение. 1974. № 2. С. 3–20. Kolesnikov B.P. The Genetic Stage in Forest Typology and its Tasks. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1974, no. 2, pp. 3–20. (In Russ.).
Комаров А.С. Пространственные индивидуально-ориентированные модели лесных экосистем // Лесоведение. 2010. № 2. С. 60–68. Komarov A.S. Spatial Individual-Based Models of Forest Ecosystems. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2010, no. 2, pp. 60–68. (In Russ.).
Лесотаксационный справочник для северо-востока европейской части СССР (нормативные материалы для Архангельской, Вологодской областей и Коми АССР) / Арханг. ин-т леса и лесохимии. Архангельск: АИЛиЛХ, 1986. 358 с. Forest Taxation Reference Book for the Northeast of the European Part of the USSR (Regulatory Materials for the Arkhangelsk and Vologda Regions, as well as the Komi ASSR). Arkhangelsk, Arkhangelsk Forest and Forest Chemistry Institute Publ., 1986. 358 p. (In Russ.).
Логофет Д.О. Марковские цепи как модели сукцессии: Новые перспективы классической парадигмы // Лесоведение. 2010. № 2. С. 46–59. Logofet D.O. Markov Chains as Models of Succession: New Perspectives of the Classical Paradigm. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2010, no. 2, pp. 46–59. (In Russ.).
Манько Ю.И. Лесообразовательный процесс и классификация лесной растительности // Лесоведение. 2004. № 5. С. 3–9. Man’ko Yu.I. Forest Formation Process and Classifications of Forest Vegetation. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2004, no. 5, pp. 3–9. (In Russ.).
Моисеев В.С., Мошкалев А.Г., Нахабцев И.А. Методика составления таблиц хода роста и динамики товарной структуры модальных насаждений. Л.: Ленингр. лесотехн. акад., 1968. 88 с. Moiseev V.S., Moshkalev A.G., Nakhabtsev I.A. Methodology for Compiling the Tables of Yield and Commodity Structure of Modal Plantings. Leningrad, Leningrad Forestry Engineering Academy Publ., 1968. 88 p. (In Russ.).
Пегов Л.А. Изучение динамики ценопопуляции березы при помощи имитационной модели // Экология популяций: тез. докл. Всесоюз. совещ., Новосибирск, 4–6 окт. 1988 г. М.: АН СССР, 1988. Ч. 2. С. 225–228. Pegov L.A. Studying the Dynamics of Birch Coenopopulation Using a Simulation Model. Ecology of Populations: Abstracts of the Reports of the All-Union Conference (Novosibirsk, October 4–6, 1988). Moscow, USSR Academy of Sciences Publ., 1988, part. 2, pp. 225–228. (In Russ.).
Писаренко А.И. Лесовосстановление. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1977. 254 с. Pisarenko A.I. Reforestation. Moscow, Lesnaya promyshlennost’ Publ., 1977. 254 p. (In Russ.).
Рубцов М.В., Дерюгин А.А. Восстановительно-возрастная динамика популяции ели под пологом южно-таежных березняков при демутационном процессе // Продукционный процесс и структура лесных биогеоценозов: теория и эксперимент (Памяти А.И. Уткина). М.: Тов-во науч. изд. КМК, 2009. С. 206–228. Rubtsov M.V., Deryugin A.A. Recovery-Age Dynamics of the Spruce Population under the Canopy of Southern Taiga Birch Forests during the Demutation Process. Production Process and Structure of Forest Biogeocenoses: Theory and Experiment (In Memory of A.I. Utkin). Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2009, pp. 206–228. (In Russ.).
Рубцов М.В., Рыбакова Н.А. Динамика парцеллярной структуры лесных фитоценозов в процессе восстановления популяции ели в южнотаежных березняках // Лесоведение. 2016. № 5. С. 323–331. Rubtsov M.V., Rybakova N.A. Dynamics of Parcel Structure of Forest Phytocenoses in Regenerating Spruce Population in Boreal Birch Forests. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 2016, no. 5, pp. 323–331. (In Russ.).
Рыбакова Н.А., Рубцов М.В. Семеношение ели под пологом южнотаежных березняков // Вестн. МГУЛ – Лесн. вестн. 2014. Т. 18, № 1. С. 73–79. Rybakova N.A., Rubtsov M.V. Seed Production of Spruce under the Canopy of Birch Forest in South Taiga. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2014, vol. 18, no. 1, рр. 73–79. (In Russ.).
Саликов Н.Я. К обоснованию модели роста древостоев // Лесоустройство и лесная таксация: сб. науч. тр. М.: ВНИИЛМ, 1981. С. 48–50. Salikov N.Ya. On the Justification of a Forest Stand Growth Model. Forest Management and Forest Taxation: Collection of Scientific Papers. Moscow, All-Russian Research Institute of Forestry and Forestry Mechanization Publ., 1981, pp. 48–50. (In Russ.).
Смолоногов Е.П. О лесообразовательном процессе // Лесоведение. 1999. № 3. С. 7–12. Smolonogov E.P. On the Forest Formation Process. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1999, no. 3, pp. 7–12. (In Russ.).
Стороженко В.Г., Быков А.В., Бухарева О.А., Петров А.В. Устойчивость лесов. Теория и практика биогеоценотических исследований. М.: Тов-во науч. изд. КМК, 2018. 171 с. Storozhenko V.G., Bykov A.V., Bukhareva O.A., Petrov A.V. Forest Sustainability. Theory and Practice of Biogeocenotic Research. Moscow, KMK Scientific Press Ltd., 2018. 171 p. (In Russ.).
Татарников Д.В. Текущее возобновление ели в производных южнотаежных фитоценозах в ходе демутационных сукцессий // Хвойные бореал. зоны. 2019. Т. XXXVII, № 6. С. 432–442. Tatarnikov D.V. Spruce Recruitment in Some Secondary Forests of Southern Taiga at Different Stages of Their Age-Related Dynamic. Khvoinye boreal'noi zony = Conifers of the Boreal Area, 2019, vol. XXXVII, no. 6, pp. 432–442. (In Russ.).
Теринов Н.Н., Андреева Е.М., Залесов С.В., Луганский Н.А., Магасумова А.Г. Восстановление еловых лесов: теория, отечественный опыт и методы решения // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2020. № 3. С. 9–23. Terinov N.N., Andreeva E.M., Zalesov S.V., Luganskiy N.A., Magasumova A.G. Restoration of Spruce Forests: Theory, National Practice and Problem Solving. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2020, no. 3, pp. 9–23. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2020-3-9-23
Уткин А.И. «Лесообразовательный процесс» – концепция российского лесоведения // Лесоведение. 1999. № 3. С. 13–24. Utkin A.I. “Forest Formation Process” – the Concept of Russian Forest Science. Lesovedenie = Russian Journal of Forest Science, 1999, no. 3, pp. 13–24. (In Russ.).
Hasenauer H. Concepts Within Tree Growth Modeling. Sustainable Forest Management, 2006, Springer, chapt. 1, pp. 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-31304-4_1
Kubota Y. Spatial Dynamics of Regeneration in a Conifer/Broad-Leaved Forest in Northern Japan. Journal of Vegetation Science, 2000, vol. 11, iss. 5, pp. 633–640. https://doi.org/10.2307/3236570
Laiho O., Pukkala T., Lähde E. Height Increment of Understorey Norway Spruces under Different Tree Canopies. Forest Ecosystems, 2014, vol. 1, art. no. 4. https://doi.org/10.1186/2197-5620-1-4
Lundqvist L., Nilson K. Regeneration Dynamics in an Uneven-Aged Virgin Norway Spruce Forest in Northern Sweden. Scandinavian Journal of Forest Research, 2007, vol. 22, iss. 4, pp. 304–309. https://doi.org/10.1080/02827580701479717
Monserung R.A. Evaluating Forest Models in a Sustainable Forest Management Context. Forest Biometry, Modelling and Information Sciences, 2003, vol. 1, pp. 35–47.
Peng C., Wen X. Forest Simulation Models. Computer Applications in Sustainable Forest Management, 2006, vol. 11, chapt. 6, pp. 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-4387-1_6
Porté A., Bartelink H.H. Modeling Mixed Forest Growth: A Review of Models for Forest Management. Ecological Modeling, 2002, vol. 150, iss. 1–2, pp. 141–188. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-3800(01)00476-8
Pretzsch H., Block J., Dieler J., Dong P.H., Kohnle U., Nagel J., Spellmann H., Zingg A. Comparison between the Productivity of Pure and Mixed Stands of Norway Spruce and European Beech along an Ecological Gradient. Annals of Forest Science, 2010, vol. 67, art. no. 712. https://doi.org/10.1051/forest/2010037
Pukkala T., Lähde E., Laiho O. Species Interactions in the Dynamics of Evenand Uneven-Aged Boreal Forests. Journal of Sustainable Forestry, 2013, vol. 32, iss. 4, pp. 371–403. https://doi.org/10.1080/10549811.2013.770766
