Formation of Aboveground Phytomass of Pine and Spruce in Forest Plantations on Post-Agricultural Lands

Authors

  • Dmitry A. Danilov Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7504-5743
  • Artem A. Yakovlev Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8450-2806
  • Ivan A. Krylov Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021 https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7122-2418
  • Sergey A. Suvorov Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021 https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4429-8131

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2026-2-44-58

Keywords:

regression equations, phytomass, coniferous undergrowth, postagrogenic lands, natural regeneration

Abstract

This research investigates the resource potential of woody vegetation colonizing former agricultural lands, assessing its feasibility for integration into sustainable forestry. A critical metric for evaluating such ecosystems is aboveground phytomass, which also serves as a proxy for estimating carbon sequestration – a factor of paramount importance amidst global climate challenges. The study was conducted on abandoned farmlands within the Gatchina district of the Leningrad region, focusing on young, naturally regenerated stands and artificial plantations. On permanently established sample plots, a complete census was performed for the dominant native conifers: Scots pine (Pinus sylvestris) and Norway spruce (Picea abies). To quantify standing phytomass and develop allometric models, 7 to 9 representative trees per species were felled. Each tree was fractionated into its components (stem, branches, and needles), with each fraction weighed separately. These detailed measurements provided the basis for regression analysis, yielding species-specific equations for predicting the biomass of individual tree compartments. Although the derived models exhibit high coefficients of determination, predictive accuracy – particularly for crown components – is constrained by the pronounced morphological variability inherent to actively growing young trees. Analysis of biomass allocation revealed that for both species, the stem constitutes the largest reservoir of mass. The relative contribution of the assimilation apparatus (needles) was lowest in pine, whereas in spruce, branches represented the smallest fraction. Application of these allometric equations indicates that at this early successional stage, young pine stands store the maximum aboveground phytomass per unit area. Comprehensive, long-term data on woody biomass accumulation in post-agrogenic landscapes remain scarce for this region. The findings are therefore significant for advancing regional forestry strategies and highlight the potential of this biomass as a feedstock for industrial wood chips and bioenergy production.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Dmitry A. Danilov, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021

Doctor of Agriculture, Prof.; ResearcherID: S-7007-2019

Artem A. Yakovlev , Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021

Candidate of Agriculture, Assoc. Prof.; ResearcherID: AAR-5081-2021

Ivan A. Krylov, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021

Postgraduate Student; ResearcherID: ADM-9554-2022

Sergey A. Suvorov, Saint Petersburg State Forest Technical University named after S.M. Kirov, Institutskiy per., 5, lit. U., St. Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194021

Postgraduate Student; ResearcherID: AAC-9497-2022

References

Бондаренко А.С., Жигунов А.В. Статистическая обработка данных в лесном хозяйстве. СПб.: Политехн. ун-т, 2016. 125 с.

Bondarenko A.S., Zhigunov A.V. Statistical data processing in forestry: Tutorial. St. Petersburg, Polytechnic University Press Publ., 2016. 125 p. (In Russ.).

Грибов С.Е., Корчагов С.А., Хамитов Р.С., Евдокимов И.В. Производительность древостоев, сформировавшихся на землях сельскохозяйственного назначения // Лесн. вестн. 2020. Т. 24, № 6. С. 19–25.

Gribov S.E., Korchagov S.A., Khamitov R.S., Evdokimov I.V. Productivity of Stands Formed on Agricultural Lands. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2020, vol. 24, no. 6, pp. 19–25. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2020-6-19-25

Данилов Д.А., Шестаков В.А., Шестакова Т.А., Эндерс О.О. Сукцессионные стадии восстановления древесной растительности на постагрогенных землях Ленинградской области // Изв. С.-Петерб. лесотехн. акад. 2020. Вып. 233. С. 60–80.

Danilov D.A., Shestakov V.A., Shestakova T.A., Enders O.O. Successional Stages of Restoration of Woody Vegetation on Postagrogenic Lands of the Leningrad Region. Izvestia Sankt-Peterburgskoj lesotehniceskoj akademii = Proceedings of the St. Petersburg Forestry Academy, 2020, iss. 233, pp. 60–80. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.21266/2079-4304.2020.233.60-80

Данилов Д.А., Яковлев А.А., Суворов С.А., Крылов И.А., Корчагов С.А., Хамитов Р.С. Формирование надземной фитомассы лиственных древесных пород на постагрогенных землях // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2023. № 1. С. 65–76.

Danilov D.A., Yakovlev A.A., Suvorov S.A., Krylov I.A., Korchagov S.A., Khamitov R.S. Formation of Aboveground Phytomass of Deciduous Tree Species on Postagricultural Land. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2023, no. 1, pp. 65–76. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.37482/0536-1036-2023-1-65-76

Карпин В.А., Петров Н.В., Туюнен А.В. Восстановление лесных фитоценозов после различных видов сельскохозяйственного использования земель в условиях среднетаежной подзоны // Сиб. лесн. журн. 2017. № 6. С. 120–129.

Karpin V.A., Petrov N.V., Tuyunen A.V. Regeneration of Forest Phytocoenoses After Various Agricultural Land Use Practices in the Conditions of Middle Taiga Subzone. Sibirskij Lesnoj Zurnal = Siberian Journal of Forest Science, 2017, no. 6, pp. 120–129. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.15372/SJFS20170610

Комаров А.С., Чертов О.Г., Михайлов А.В., Абакумов Е.В., Андриенко Г., Андриенко Н., Аппс М., Бобровский М.В., Бхатти Дж., Быховец С.С., Глухова Е.М., Грабарник П.Я., Зубкова Е.В., Зудин С.Л., Зудина Е.В., Кубасова Т.С., Лукьянов А.М., Мартынкин А.В., Морен Ф., Припутина И.В., Смирнов В.Э., Ханина Л.Г., Шанин В.Н., Шо С. Моделирование динамики органического вещества в лесных экосистемах. М.: Наука, 2007. 380 с.

Komarov A.S., Chertov O.G., Mikhailov A.V., Abakumov E.V., Andrienko G., Andrienko N., Appes M., Bobrovsky M.V., Bhatti J., Bykhovets S.S., Gluhova E.M., Grabarnik P.Y., Zubkova E.V., Zudin S.L., Zudina E.V, Kubasova T.S., Lukyanov A.M., Martynkin A.V., Morin F., Priputina I.V., Smirnov V.E., Khanina L.G., Shanin V.N., Shaw S. Modeling the Dynamics of Organic Matter in Forest Ecosystems. Moscow, Nauka Publ., 2007. 380 p. (In Russ.).

Новикова М.А., Грязькин А.В., Беляева Н.В., Хетагуров Х.М., Нгуен В.З. Формирование лесных фитоценозов на заброшенных землях сельскохозяйственного назначения // Аграрн. науч. журн. 2016. № 6. С. 29–33.

Novikova M.A., Gryazkin A.V., Belyaeva N.V., Khetagurov H.M., Nguyen V.Z. Formation of Forest Phytocenoses on Abandoned Agricultural Land. Agrarnyj nauchnyj zhurnal = Agrarian Scientific Journal, 2016, no. 6, pp. 29–33. (In Russ.).

Полубояринов О.И. Плотность древесины. М.: Лесн. пром-сть, 1976. 160 с.

Poluboyarinov O.I. Density of wood. Moscow, Forest Industry Publ., 1976. 160 p. (In Russ.).

Пристова Т.А. Фитомасса древесных растений в лиственных фитоценозах послерубочного происхождения // Лесн. вестн. 2020. Т. 24, № 1. С. 5–13.

Pristova T.A. Phytomass of Woody Plants in Deciduous Phytocenoses After Felling. Lesnoy Vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2020, vol. 24, no. 1, pp. 5–13. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.18698/2542-1468-2020-1-5-13

Родин Л.Е., Ремезов Н.П., Базилевич Н.И. Методические указания к изучению динамики и биологического круговорота в фитоценозах. Л.: Наука, 1968. 145 с.

Rodin L.E., Remezov N.P., Bazilevich N.I. Methodological Guidelines for the Study of Dynamics and Biological Cycling in Phytocenoses. Leningrad, Nauka Publ., 1968. 145 p. (In Russ.).

Усольцев А.В., Цепордей И.С. Квалиметрия фитомассы лесных деревьев: плотность и содержание сухого вещества. Екатеринбург: УГЛТУ, 2020. 178 c.

Usoltsev A.V., Tsepordei I.S. Qualimetry of Phytomass of Forest Trees: Density and Dry Matter Content. Ekaterinburg, UGLTU Publ., 2020. 178 p. (In Russ.).

Усольцев В.А., Усольцев А.В. Регрессионная модель предельных показателей фитомассы сосновых древостоев // Изв. вузов. Лесн. журн. 2001. № 1. C. 7–13.

Usoltsev V.A., Usoltsev A.V. Regression Model of Limiting Indicators of Phytomass of Pine Stands. Lesnoy Zhurnal = Russian Forestry Journal, 2001, no. 1, pp. 7–13. (In Russ.).

Уткин А.И., Замолодчиков Д.Г., Гульбе Т.А., Гульбе Я.И. Аллометрические уравнения для фитомассы по данным деревьев сосны, ели, березы, осины в европейской части России // Лесоведение. 1996. № 6. С. 36–46.

Utkin A.I., Zamolodchikov D.G., Gulbe T.A., Gulbe Y.I. Allometric Equations for Phytomass According to Pine, Spruce, Birch and Aspen Trees in European Russia. Lesovedenie = Forestry Science, 1996, no. 6, pp. 36–46. (In Russ.).

Феклистов П.А., Тюрикова Т.В., Аверина М.В. Роль типов леса в смене пород на старопахотных землях Кенозерского национального парка // Вестн. МГУЛ – Лесн. вестн. 2016. Т. 20, № 6. С. 39–43.

Feklistov P.A., Tyurikova T.V., Averina M.V. The Role of Forest Types in the Change of Species in the Old-Fallow Lands of Kenozersky National Park. Lesnoy vestnik = Forestry Bulletin, 2016, vol. 20, no. 6, pp. 39–43. (In Russ.).

Яковлев А.А. Влияние почвенных условий на формирование растительных сообществ на постагрогенных и лесных землях (на примере Ленинградской области): дис. … канд. с.-х. наук. СПб., 2024. 354 с.

Yakovlev A.A. Influence of Soil Conditions on the Formation of Plant Communities on Postagrogenic and Forest Lands (on the Example of the Leningrad Region): Cand. Agric. Sci. Diss. Saint Petersburg, 2024. 354 p. (In Russ.).

Danilov D.A., Shestakova T.A., Shestakova V.I., Anders O.O., Ivanov A.A. The Effect of Living Ground Cover on the Development of the Young Generation of Tree Species on Post-Agrogenic Lands of the Boreal Zone. IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 2020, vol. 574, no. 012015. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/574/1/012015

Domke G.M., Woodall C.W., Smith J.E., Westfall J.A., McRoberts R.E. Consequences of Alternative Tree-Level Biomass Estimation Procedures on U.S. Forest Carbon Stock Estimates. Forest Ecology and Management, 2012. vol. 270, pp. 108–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2012.01.022

Gradinaru S.R., Kienast F., Psomas A. Using Multi-Seasonal Landsat Imagery for Rapid Identification of Abandoned Land in Areas Affected by Urban Sprawl. Ecological Indicators, 2019, no. 96, pp. 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2017.06.022

Kukuls I., Klavins M., Nikodemus O., Kasparinskis R., Brumelis G. Changes in Soil Organic Matter and Soil Humic Substances Following the Afforestation of Former Agricultural Lands in the Boreal-Nemoral Ecotone (Latvia). Geoderma Regional, 2019, no. 16, pp. e00213. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geodrs.2019.e00213

Mahajan V., Choudhary P., Raina N.S., Sharma P. Carbon Sequestration Potential of Trees in Arable Land-use and Allometric Modelling for Dominant Tree Species in Sub-Tropics of Jammu and Kashmir. Journal of Environmental Biology, 2021, no. 42(2), pp. 414–419. https://doi.org/10.22438/jeb/42/2(SI)/SI-245

Marklund L.G. Biomass Functions for Pine, Spruce and Birch in Sweden. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Forest Survey, 1988, rep. 45, p. 73. (In Swed.).

Nogueira F.C.B., Dobe E.K., Silva Filho J.B., Rodrigues L.S. Allometric Equations to Estimate Aboveground Biomass of Dalbergia Cearensis Species in the Brazilian Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest. Forest Ecology and Management, 2021, vol. 484, pp. 118920. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foreco.2021.118920

Ovsepyan L., Kurganova L., Lopes de Gerenyu V., Kuzyakov Y. Recovery of Organic Matter and Microbial Biomass After Abandonment of Degraded Agricultural Soils: The Influence of Climate. Land Degradation and Development, 2019, no. 30, pp. 1861–1874. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3387

Pothong T., Elliott S., Chairuangsri S., Chanthorn W., Shannon D., Wangpakapattanawong P. New Allometric Equations for Quantifying Tree Biomass And Carbon Sequestration in Seasonally Dry Secondary Forest in Northern Thailand. New Forests, 2022, no. 53, pp. 17–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11056-021-09844-3

Segura C., Navarro F.B., Jiménez M.N., Fernández-Ondoño E. Implications of Afforestation Vs. Secondary Succession for Soil Properties Under a Semiarid Climate. Science of The Total Environment, 2020, no. 704, pp. 135391. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.135393

Tabacchi G., Di Cosmo L., Gasparini P. Aboveground Tree Volume and Phytomass Prediction Equations for Forest Species in Italy. European Journal of Forest Research, 2011, no. 130(6), pp. 911–934. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10342-011-0481-9

Volkova I., Solodunov A., Kondratenko L. Composition and Structure of Regrowth Forests on Abandoned Agricultural Land. Journal of Forest Science, 2020, no. 66, pp. 436–442. https://doi.org/10.17221/100/2020-JFS

Zethof J.H.T., Cammeraat E.L.H., Nadal-Romero E. The Enhancing Effect of Afforestation Over Secondary Succession on Soil Quality Under Semiarid Climate Conditions. Science of the Total Environment, 2019, no. 652, pp. 1090–1101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.10.235

Published

2026-04-15

How to Cite

Danilov Д., Yakovlev А., Krylov И., and Suvorov С. “Formation of Aboveground Phytomass of Pine and Spruce in Forest Plantations on Post-Agricultural Lands”. Lesnoy Zhurnal (Russian Forestry Journal), no. 2, Apr. 2026, pp. 44-58, doi:10.37482/0536-1036-2026-2-44-58.

Most read articles by the same author(s)