Analysis of Existentials as Anthropological Categories in Late Soviet Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V278Keywords:
existentials, anthropology, anthropological categories, late Soviet philosophy, V.I. Shinkaruk, V.G. Tabachkovsky, M.K. Mamardashvili, G.S. BatishchevAbstract
The article deals with the analysis of existentials as anthropological categories in late Soviet philosophy. A number of key categories and authors who developed them are highlighted. It is shown that during the1970s and 1980s, Soviet philosophers autonomously studied the problem of understanding a person, which is called existential. Being isolated from Western schools of thought, Soviet philosophers followed an independent and original path in the analysis of existentials. Therefore, these texts have not lost their significance as examples of that independent philosophy, which is based on real spiritual and intellectual experience. The concepts of spiritual feelings by V.I. Shinkaruk, practices as a special form of communication by V.G. Tabachkovsky, the philosophy of “second birth” by M.K. Mamardashvili and the existential of spiritual death as interpreted by G.S. Batishchev represent original achievements of Soviet philosophy that have no direct equivalents in Western philosophy of the 20th century. They were based on a deep and specific spiritual experience of living in a secular culture. The considered range of anthropological categories (existentials), which were developed in late Soviet philosophy, allows us to conclude that the latter generally gravitated, on the one hand, towards existential problems as such and, on the other, towards a spontaneous revival of elements of Christian consciousness on the basis of a new spiritual and intellectual experience of the crisis of secular consciousness. Therefore, it can be said that it was during this period that the foundation and model for the subsequent development of the original Russian philosophy were established, which in the 21st century assumed more diverse and developed forms.
Downloads
References
Пущаев Ю.В. Философия советского времени: М. Мамардашвили и Э. Ильенков (энергии отталкивания и притяжения): моногр. М.: РАН. ИНИОН, 2018. 356 с.
Замалеев А.Ф. О советской философии // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та. Сер. 6.: Философия, политология, социология, психология, право, международные отношения. 2004. Вып. 2. С. 4–8.
Мотрошилова Н.В. Отечественная философия 50–80-х годов XX века и западная мысль. М.: Акад. Проект, 2012. 376 с.
Хайдеггер М. Основные понятия метафизики // Вопр. философии. 1989. № 9. С. 116–165.
Категориальная структура научного мировоззрения // Мировоззренческое содержание категорий и законов материалистической диалектики / отв. ред. В.И. Шанкарук, А.Я. Яценко. Киев: Наукова думка, 1981. С. 11−25.
Сущность мировоззрения. Научное мировоззрение как его высший исторический тип // Научное мировоззрение и социалистическая культура / отв. ред. В.И. Шанкарук, В.П. Иванов. Киев: Наукова думка, 1988. С. 21–47.
Шинкарук В.І. Віра, надія, любов // Віче. 1994. № 3. С. 144–152.
Даренский В.Ю. Парадоксы целостности человека в наследии Киевской философско-антропологической школы // Вестн. Сев. (Арктич.) федер. ун-та. Сер.: Гуманит. и соц. науки. 2017. № 5. С. 67–77. DOI: 10.17238/issn2227-6564.2017.5.67
Категориальность мировосприятия и структура практики // Категориальные структуры познания и практики / отв. ред. В.Г. Табачковский. Киев: Наукова думка, 1986. С. 10–82.
Мамардашвили М. Лекции о Прусте (психологическая топология пути). М.: Ad Marginem, 1995. 550 с.
Пузырей А.А. Драма неисцеленного разума // Зощенко М.М. Повесть о разуме. М.: Педагогика, 1990. С. 149–183.
Батищев Г.С. Выступление // Жизнь и смерть: загадки и противоречия (По материалам «круглого стола». М., 1989 г.) / сост. И.Н. Михеева. М.: Знание, 1990. С. 32–36.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Вера Николаевна ДАРЕНСКАЯ (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.