Particle Homonymy in the German Language

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V346

Keywords:

German language, particle homonymy, modal particles, focus particles, stressed particles

Abstract

The purpose of this article is a systematic description of homonymous particles of the German language. The author turned to this issue since there is a need to reveal the conditions under which the particles ja, doch, bloß, nur, eben and schon can exhibit homonymous properties. Contextual and component analysis as well as the descriptive method are used in the study. The specific features of each class of particles are studied, in accordance with which, cases of the use of particles in the appropriate role are described. Based on the analysis of factual material from the DWDS и DECOW 16A corpora, the following criteria for identifying homonymous particles are proposed: functions; position in the sentence structure; scope of application; presence/absence of stress. Modal particles are represented as causal connectors capable of establishing logical connections between sentences and simultaneously conveying the speaker’s attitude; contrastive (stressed) particles are markers of contradictory or complementary contrast; focus and intensifying particles are associated with one word in a sentence and can be interpreted at the level of the phrase. It is suggested to consider modal and contrastive particles as grammaticalized units; discursive particles act as pragmatized elements; the meaning of focus and intensifying particles can be interpreted in a narrow context since they retain some of their semantics. The paper makes a contribution to the description of German particle homonymy. The results obtained can be used in practical German classes during senior years at language universities and in the course of theoretical grammar of the German language.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Anna V. Averina, Мoscow State Linguistic University

Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Prof., Prof at the Department of German Grammar and History, Moscow State Linguistic University

References

Thurmair M. Modalpartikeln und ihre Kombinationen. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1989. 314 S.

Meibauer J. Modaler Kontrast und konzeptuelle Verschiebung: Studien zur Syntax und Semantik deutscher Modalpartikeln. Tübingen: Niemeyer Verlag, 1994. 252 S.

Eroms H.-W. Syntax der deutschen Sprache. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 2000. 510 S.

Abraham W. Deutsche Syntax im Sprachenvergleich: Grundlegung einer typologischen Syntax im Deutschen. Tübingen: Stauffenburg Verlag, 2013. 707 S.

Abraham W. Deutsche Modalpartikel in Nichthauptsatz- und Infinitkonstruktionen // Stud. Germanistica Gedanensia. 2019. № 41. S. 17‒36. https://doi.org/10.26881/sgg.2019.41.01

Helbig G., Buscha J. Deutsche Grammatik: Ein Handbuch für den Ausländerunterricht. Berlin: Langenscheidt, 2001. 654 S.

Hentschel E., Weydt H. Handbuch der deutschen Grammatik. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter, 1994. 452 S.

Duden: Die Grammatik: Unentbehrlich für richtiges Deutsch. Mannheim: Dudenverlag, 2009. 1349 S.

Аверина А.В. Частицы в немецком языке: моногр. М.: МГОУ, 2022. 142 с.

Аверина А.В. Принципы организации системы частей речи и их интерпретация с позиции внутренней перспективы (на материале немецкого и русского языков) // Вестн. Моск. гос. обл. ун-та. 2023. № 1. Ст. № 10. https://doi.org/10.18384/2224-0209-2023-1-1213

Lehmann C. Thoughts on Grammaticalization. Erfurt: Seminar für Sprachwissenschaft der Universität, 2002. 183 S.

Engel U. Gaudium in scientia linguarum: Ausgewählte Schriften. Dresden: Neisse Verlag, 2006. 372 S.

Mroczynski R. Grammatikalisierung und Pragmatikalisierung: Zur Herausbildung der Diskursmarker wobei, weil und ja in gesprochenen Deutsch. Tübingen: Narr Verlag, 2012. 254 S.

Published

2024-07-01

How to Cite

Averina А. В. (2024). Particle Homonymy in the German Language. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 24(3), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V346