Representation of the Intersex Phenomenon in Contemporary Culture: Cinematic Discourse

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V133

Keywords:

intersexuality, intersex people, intersex culture, gender identity, non-binary gender, androgyny, contemporary culture, modern cinematography

Abstract

Today, significant changes are taking place in the approach to the study of many sociocultural phenomena. Duality and polarity of their perception and analysis are being mitigated, alternative facets of the familiar and the generally accepted are coming to light, a number of “marginal” ideas are becoming the “new norm”. The research paradigm of the 20th – 21st centuries pays special attention to non-binary gender. Modern researchers focus on such issues as self-identification and search for gender identity, mechanisms of gender construction, variability of sex-role and identification models, non-conventional forms of gender identity (transgender and agender, intersexuality, etc.), as well as their representation in contemporary culture. One of such nonconventional phenomena of culture today is intersexuality, the current form of the well-known philosophical idea of androgyny. Intersex as a phenomenon of contemporary culture is considered as an element of the emerging non-binary gender system. Nowadays, intersex is not only the denomination of a person with biological characteristics atypical of the binary gender paradigm, but also the name of a distinctive culture discussing the problems of this new kind of people, who have become a significant part of our society. This article studies the representation of the intersex phenomenon in contemporary culture through the lens of cinematography. The sociocultural status of intersexuality explains the increasing quantity and thematic diversity of cinematic material. Intersexuality is a subject of active artistic reflection of many contemporary directors (L. Puenzo, C. Lavagna, J. Solomonoff, R. Féret, S. Savory, etc.), the discussion of acute social, legal and ethical problems being their focus. Thus, the leading themes are as follows: self-identification of intersex people and their search for gender identity; the problem of medicalization of intersex people and the legality of “corrective”/ “normalizing” operations from both medical and ethical points of view; parent–intersex child relationship; socialization of intersex teenagers and social acceptance of this new type of person.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Светлана Олеговна ИЗРИНА, Saint Petersburg State University

аспирант кафедры культурологии, философии культуры и эстетики

References

Конев В.А. Антропологический поворот/разворот культуры – новый вариант проекта модерна // Междунар. журн. исследований культуры. 2014. № 5(15). С. 5–11.

Марков Б.В. Образ человека в постантропологическую эпоху // Вопр. философии. 2011. № 2. С. 23–33.

де Бовуар С. Второй пол: пер. с фр. И. Малаховой, Е. Орловой, А. Сабащниковой. СПб.: Азбука, Азбука- Аттикус, 2019. 928 с.

Бем С.Л. Линзы гендера: Трансформация взглядов на проблему неравенства полов: пер. с англ. Д. Викторовой. М.: РОССПЭН, 2004. 336 с.

Bem S.L. Bem Sex Role: Inventory Professional Manual. Palo Alto: Consulting Psychologists Press, 1981. 37 р.

Bem S.L. The Measurement of Psychological Androgyny // J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 1974. Vol. 42, № 2. P. 155–162. DOI: 10.1037/h0036215

Butler J. Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Identity. London: Routledge, 2006. 272 p.

Jagose А. Queer Theory: An Introduction. N. Y.: New York University Press, 1996. 153 р.

Australian Government Guidelines on the Recognition of Sex and Gender. 2013. URL: https://www.ag.gov.au/rights-and-protections/publications/australian-government-guidelines-recognition-sex-and-gender (дата обращения: 04.04.2021).

Иванова-Казас О.М. Гермафродиты, интерсексы и андрогины в мифологии, философии и природе // Междисциплинар. науч. и приклад. журн. «Биосфера». 2012. Т. 4, № 1. С. 90–96.

Money J. Hermaphroditism: An Inquiry into the Nature of Human Paradox. Dissertation: Ph. D. Harvard University. Cambridge, 1952. 444 p.

Money J. Hermaphroditism, Gender and Precocity in Hyperadrenocorticism: Psychologic Findings // Bull. ohns Hopkins Hosp. 1955. Vol. 96, № 6. P. 253–264.

Money J., Ehrhardt A.A. Man and Woman, Boy and Girl: The Differentiation and Dimorphism of Gender Identity from Conception to Maturity. Baltimore: John Hopkins University Press, 1972. 311 p.

Published

2021-11-11

How to Cite

ИЗРИНА, С. О. (2021). Representation of the Intersex Phenomenon in Contemporary Culture: Cinematic Discourse. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 21(5), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V133