The Problem of Man in I.A. Ilyin’s Philosophy
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V367Keywords:
anthropology, Russian religious philosophy, revolution, being, problem of man, spirituality, I.A. IlyinAbstract
Anthropological issues occupy a special place in Russian religious philosophy. This article examines the problem of man in the later works of prominent Russian thinker I.A. Ilyin (1883–1954). The paper aimed to demonstrate the characteristic features of humans in Ilyin’s philosophy. The methods used in the paper are: historical-genetic, hermeneutic, and comparative, as well as the methods of analysis, synthesis, and generalization. During the first two decades of the 20th century, Russia experienced three revolutions and two wars, which could not but affect the thinking of Russian philosophers. Thus, a question was raised about man as a subject of the changing points in history. Since every revolution brings a transformation in moral attitudes, providing the essential definitions of man was rather difficult. One thing was clear, however: humans are in the deepest crisis, and the only way out of it is through intensified spiritual work. A semantic gap appeared between the human proper as the bearer of revolutionary consciousness and a certain imperative of the essence of man, which must be brought to light and implemented in reality. A special place in the article is given to the problem of spirituality, which is a key component of humans if viewed in the context of revolutionary transformations. The crisis of spirituality is proposed to be considered as an indicator of the universal human crisis, which must be corrected on the path to spiritual renewal. The study suggests a point of view according to which spirituality is a fundamental quality of a person experiencing a crisis; it is the basis of human rebirth from revolutionary captivity and of the formation of man’s new image that is able to bring existence to full-fledged characteristics.
Downloads
References
Хайдеггер М. Пролегомены к истории понятия времени. Томск: Водолей, 1998. 383 с.
Гуссерль Э. Кризис европейских наук и трансцендентальная феноменология // Гуссерль Э. Логические исследования. Картезианские размышления. Минск: Харвест; М.: АСТ, 2000. С. 543–624.
Кант И. Критика чистого разума. М.: Эксмо, 2022. 784 с.
Бердяев Н.А. Философия свободы / сост., вступ. ст. и коммент. В.В. Шкоды. М.: АСТ; Харьков: Фолио, 2004. 732 с.
Декарт Р. Рассуждения о методе. М.: АСТ, 2023. 416 с.
Буллер А., Линченко А.А., Стурова Е.А. Проблема исторической ответственности в русской религиознофилософской мысли конца XIX – начала XX вв. (на примере сборника «Вехи») // Вестн. Томск. гос. ун-та. 2020. № 451. C. 69–76.
Зеньковский В.В. История русской философии. М.: ЭКСМО-Пресс; Харьков: Фолио, 2001. 885 с.
Гегель Г.В.Ф. Энциклопедия философских наук: в 3 т. Т. 1. Наука логики. М.: Мысль, 1974. 452 с.
Пономарев Е.Р. Отечество в философских построениях И.А. Ильина: литературные проекции // Stud. Litterarum. 2021. T. 6, № 3. C. 222–243. https://doi.org/10.22455/2500-4247-2021-6-3-222-243
Obolevitch T. Ontologism in Semyon Frank // Stud. East Eur. Thought. 2021. Vol. 73, № 2. P. 155–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-020-09369-z
Черняев А.В., Цыганков А.С. Н.А. Бердяев в Голландии: к истории католической рецепции русской мысли 1920–1930-х гг. // Вестн. Православ. Св.-Тихон. гуманит. ун-та. Сер. 1: Богословие. Философия. Религиоведение. 2021. Вып. 97. С. 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.15382/sturI202197.59-72
Франк С.Л. Сочинения. М.: Правда, 1990. 607 с.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Александр Владимирович Усачев (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.