Idiom Characteristics: A Psycho- and Neurolinguistic Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V363Keywords:
phraseology, phraseological unit, idiom, idiom properties, psycholinguistics, neurolinguisticsAbstract
This article analyses idiom characteristics within the framework of the psycholinguistic paradigm and neurolinguistic experiments. The purpose was to describe and systematize the main properties of idioms relevant for the processing of such expressions by the brain, in particular perception, comprehension and production. Features suggested by both Russian and foreign researchers are considered. In addition, the problematic issue of terminology is addressed, as the terms often differ significantly between Russian- and English-language works. Due to the fact that Russian psycholinguists have paid less attention to phraseology, in this article the term idiom is used in accordance with the Western linguistic tradition, where it stands for a type of a phraseological unit whose meaning cannot be derived from the conjoined meanings of its elements. The results of the present study allow us to distinguish the following idiom characteristics: familiarity, frequency, conventionality, syntactic frozenness, decomposability, transparency, literal plausibility, predictability, and salience. Additionally, the research findings suggest that each of the abovementioned features may vary considerably among expressions, which drives us to the conclusion that idioms as a class are extremely heterogeneous. Furthermore, these characteristics directly
influence idiom processing in the brain, which determines the time course of comprehension and accuracy of interpretation. According to the latest data obtained using neurolinguistic research methods, the degree of each feature’s manifestation in a given expression determines which brain region is activated and serves as the key factor contributing to hemispheric differences in idiom processing. The obtained knowledge about the processes occurring in the brain during perception, comprehension and use of idioms can be applied to improve the efficiency of teaching foreign languages and translation.
Downloads
References
Кунин А.В. Фразеология современного английского языка: опыт систематизированного описания. М.: Междунар. отношения, 1972. 288 с.
Виноградов В.В. Избранные труды. Лексикология и лексикография / отв. ред. В.Г. Костомаров. М.: Наука, 1977. 312 с.
Поливанов Е.Д. Избранные работы. Труды по восточному и общему языкознанию. М.: Наука. Гл. ред. вост. лит., 1991. 623 с.
Амосова Н.Н. Современное состояние и перспективы фразеологии // Вопр. языкознания. 1966. № 3. С. 65–72.
Шанский Н.М. Очерки по русскому словообразованию и лексикологии. М.: Учпедгиз, 1959. 246 с.
Телия В.Н. Русская фразеология. Семантический, прагматический и лингвокультурологический аспекты. М.: Шк. «Яз. рус. культуры», 1996. 285 с.
Смирницкий А.И. Лексикология английского языка. М.: Омен: МГУ, 1998. 260 с.
Мельчук И.А., Иорданская Л.Н. Смысл и сочетаемость в словаре. М.: Яз. славян. культуры, 2013. 649 с.
Баранов А.Н., Добровольский Д.О. Аспекты теории фразеологии. М.: Знак, 2008. 656 с.
Слюсарь Н.А., Петрова Т.Е., Михайловская Е.В., Череповская Н.В., Прокопеня В.К., Чернова Д.А., Черниговская Т.В. Экспериментальные исследования ментального лексикона: словосочетания с буквальным и небуквальным значением // Вопр. языкознания. 2017. № 3. С. 83–98. https://doi.org/10.31857/S0373658X0000997-5
Gibbs R.W. Spilling the Beans on Understanding and Memory for Idioms in Conversation // Mem. Cogn. 1980. Vol. 8, № 2. P. 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03213418
Swinney D.A., Cutler A. The Access and Processing of Idiomatic Expressions // J. Verbal Learn. Verbal Behav. 1979. Vol. 18, № 5. P. 523–534. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90284-6
Cacciari C., Tabossi P. The Comprehension of Idioms // J. Mem. Lang. 1988. Vol. 27, № 6. P. 668–683. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(88)90014-9
Bobrow S.A., Bell S.M. On Catching on to Idiomatic Expressions // Mem. Cogn. 1973. Vol. 1, № 3. P. 343–346. https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03198118
Libben M.R., Titone D.A. The Multidetermined Nature of Idiom Processing // Mem. Cogn. 2008. Vol. 36, № 6. P. 1103–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/mc.36.6.1103
Nunberg G., Sag I.A., Wasow T. Idioms // Language. 1994. Vol. 70, № 3. P. 491–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/416483
Sprenger S.A., Levelt W.J.M., Kempen G. Lexical Access During the Production of Idiomatic Phrases // J. Mem. Lang. 2006. Vol. 54, № 2. P. 161–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.11.001
Titone D.A., Connine C.M. Descriptive Norms for 171 Idiomatic Expressions: Familiarity, Compositionality, Predictability, and Literality // Metaphor Symb. Activity. 1994. Vol. 9, № 4. P. 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327868ms0904_1
Nippold M.A., Rudzinski M. Familiarity and Transparency in Idiom Explanation: A Developmental Study of Children and Adolescents // J. Speech Hear. Res. 1993. Vol. 36, № 4. P. 728–737. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3604.728
Citron F.M.M., Cacciari C., Funcke J.M., Hsu C.-T., Jacobs A.M. Idiomatic Expressions Evoke Stronger Emotional Responses in the Brain Than Literal Sentences // Neuropsychologia. 2019. Vol. 131. P. 233–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.05.020
Giora R. On Our Mind: Salience, Context, and Figurative Language. N. Y.: Oxford Univ. Press, 2003. 272 p.
Yang J., Li P., Fang X., Shu H., Liu Y., Chen L. Hemispheric Involvement in the Processing of Chinese Idioms: An fMRI Study // Neuropsychologia. 2016. Vol. 87. P. 12–24. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2016.04.029
Canal P., Pesciarelli F., Vespignani F., Molinaro N., Cacciari C. Basic Composition and Enriched Integration in Idiom Processing: An EEG Study // J. Exp. Psychol. Learn. Mem. Cogn. 2017. Vol. 43, № 6. P. 928–943. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000351
Thoma P., Daum I. Neurocognitive Mechanisms of Figurative Language Processing – Evidence from Clinical Dysfunctions // Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2006. Vol. 30, № 8. P. 1182–1205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2006.09.001
Caillies S., Le Sourn-Bissaoui S. Children’s Understanding of Idioms and Theory of Mind Development // Development. Dev. Sci. 2008. Vol. 11, № 5. P. 703–711. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-7687.2008.00720.x
Cronk B.C., Lima S.D., Schweigert W.A. Idioms in Sentences: Effects of Frequency, Literalness, and Familiarity // J. Psycholinguist. Res. 1993. Vol. 22, № 1. P. 59–82. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01068157
Van Lancker Sidtis D., Kougentakis K.M., Cameron K., Falconer C., Sidtis J.J. “Down with ___”: The Linguistic Schema as Intermediary Between Formulaic and Novel Expressions // Yearb. Phraseol. 2012. Vol. 3, № 1. https://doi.org/10.1515/phras-2012-0005
Carrol G., Littlemore J., Dowens M.G. Of False Friends and Familiar Foes: Comparing Native and Non-Native Understanding of Figurative Phrases // Lingua. 2018. Vol. 204. P. 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2017.11.001
Koller S., Muller N., Kauschke C. The Elephant in the Room: A Systematic Review of Stimulus Control in Neuro-Measurement Studies on Figurative Language Processing // Front. Hum. Neurosci. 2021. Vol. 15. Art. № 791374. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.791374
Citron F.M.M., Michaelis N., Goldberg A.E. Metaphorical Language Processing and Amygdala Activation in L1 and L2 // Neuropsychologia. 2020. Vol. 140. Art. № 107381. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2020.107381
Moon R. Fixed Expressions and Idioms in English: A Corpus-Based Approach. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1998. 340 p.
Tabossi P., Arduino L., Fanari R. Descriptive Norms for 245 Italian Idiomatic Expressions // Behav. Res. Methods. 2010. Vol. 43, № 1. P. 110–123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-010-0018-z
Kyriacou M., Conklin K., Thompson D. Passivizability of Idioms: Has the Wrong Tree Been Barked Up? // Lang. Speech. 2020. Vol. 63, № 2. P. 404–435. https://doi.org/10.1177/0023830919847691
Mancuso A., Elia A., Laudanna A., Vietri S. The Role of Syntactic Variability and Literal Interpretation Plausibility in Idiom Comprehension // J. Psycholinguist. Res. 2020. Vol. 49, № 1. P. 99–124. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-019-09673-8
Gibbs R.W. Jr., Nayak N.P., Cutting C. How to Kick the Bucket and Not Decompose: Analyzability and Idiom Processing // J. Mem. Lang. 1989. Vol. 28, № 5. P. 576–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90014-4
Gibbs R.W. Jr. Semantic Analyzability in Children’s Understanding of Idioms // J. Speech Hear. Res. 1991. Vol. 34, № 3. P. 613–620. https://doi.org/10.1044/jshr.3403.613
Titone D.A., Connine C.M. On the Compositional and Noncompositional Nature of Idiomatic Expressions // J. Pragmat. 1999. Vol. 31, № 12. P. 1655–1674. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0378-2166(99)00008-9
Tabossi P., Fanari R., Wolf K. Why Are Idioms Recognized Fast? // Mem. Cogn. 2009. Vol. 37, № 4. P. 529–540. https://doi.org/10.3758/MC.37.4.529
Kurada H.Z., Arıca-Akkök E., Özaydın-Aksun Z., Şener H.Ö., Lavidor M. The Impact of Transparency on Hemispheric Lateralization of Idiom Comprehension: An rTMS Study // Neuropsychologia. 2021. Vol. 163. Art. № 108062. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2021.108062
Cronk B.C., Schweigert W.A. The Comprehension of Idioms: The Effects of Familiarity, Literalness, and Usage // Appl. Psycholinguist. 1992. Vol. 13, № 2. P. 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400005531
Cacciari C., Corradini P. Literal Analysis and Idiom Retrieval in Ambiguous Idioms Processing: A ReadingTime Study // J. Cogn. Psychol. 2015. Vol. 27, № 7. P. 797–811. https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1049178
Beeman M., Chiarello C. Right Hemisphere Language Comprehension. Perspectives from Cognitive Neuroscience. Mahwah: Psychol. Press, 1998. 424 p.
Jung-Beeman M. Bilateral Brain Processes for Comprehending Natural Language // Trends Cogn. Neurosci. 2005. Vol. 9, № 11. P. 512–518. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2005.09.009
Marshal N., Faust M., Hendler T., Jung-Beeman M. An fMRI Study of Processing Novel Metaphoric Sentences // Laterality. 2009. Vol. 14, № 1. P. 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/13576500802049433
Schmidt G.L., Seger C.A. Neural Correlates of Metaphor Processing: The Roles of Figurativeness, Familiarity and Difficulty // Brain Cogn. 2009. Vol. 71, № 3. P. 375–386. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bandc.2009.06.001
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Светлана Глебовна Еремина, Дмитрий Владимирович Балаганов (Автор)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
