Study of the Internet Language as a New Semiotic System

Authors

  • Irina A. Kuznetsova Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia; Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia; Baikal State University, Irkutsk, Russia https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0443-4685

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V499

Keywords:

Internet language, semiotic system, cognitive processes, linguocognitive means, language use, sociolinguistic experiment

Abstract

The dynamics of modern technologies leads to the creation of new multimedia means of communication, especially on the Internet. The relevance of this study lies in exploring Internet communication as a new form of communication, characterized by a high degree of digitalization and having a profound impact on language. The purpose of this article was to identify and analyse the frequency of use of new linguosemiotic means of Internet communication. The research is based on the works and concepts of semiotics, Internet linguistics, media linguistics, pragmatics, communication theory, cognitive linguistics and sociolinguistics. The methods used include observation, content analysis, experiment in the form of a sociolinguistic questionnaire, and interpretive analysis. The author systematizes hybrid verbal (written and oral) and non-verbal (graphic, audial, musical) means found at different semiotic levels of the Internet language. The results of the study demonstrate that the Internet language is not just a hybrid between the oral and the written forms, but a new form of language that develops according to its own laws and produces its own creative genres. Based on a content analysis of 1500 online messages and a survey of 205 users, it was found that digital communication is actively selecting and creating semiotic signs that combine emotionality, interactivity, attractiveness and personalization. The dominance of visual and auditory elements is accompanied by the adaptation of textual and game formats to new algorithms. The increased use of multicode symbols is driven by the need to compress information and accelerate its transmission. The identified trends allow us to single out Internet language as a new semiotic system. This paper contributes to Internet linguistics, cognitive linguistics and media linguistics by expanding our understanding of linguistic processes on the Internet. The analysis of the linguistic features of Internet communication, including specific vocabulary, grammatical structures, spelling and symbols (emoticons, smileys, emoji, etc.), contributes to a better understanding and use of the Internet language for scientific and practical purposes. At the same time, it is important to draw attention to the problem of poor use of language as well as to control the Internet language, which calls for new research approaches.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Irina A. Kuznetsova, Irkutsk National Research Technical University, Irkutsk, Russia; Irkutsk State University, Irkutsk, Russia; Baikal State University, Irkutsk, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Philol.), Cand. Sci. (Sociol.), Assoc. Prof., Prof. at the Department of Foreign Languages No. 1; Prof. at the Department of Linguistics and Linguodidactics; Prof. at the Theoretical and Applied Linguistics Department

References

Горошко Е.И. Интернет-жанр и функционирование языка в Интернете: попытка рефлексии // Жанры речи: сб. науч. ст. Вып. 6. Жанр и язык. Саратов: Наука, 2009. С. 111–127.

Рябцева Н.К. Отличительные особенности интернет-коммуникации в металингвистическом и прикладном аспекте // Лингвистика и методика преподавания иностранных языков: период. сб. науч. ст. Вып. 9. М.: Ин-т языкознания РАН, 2017. С. 387–429. URL: https://iling-ran.ru/library/sborniki/for_lang/2017_09/14.pdf (дата обращения: 26.10.2019).

Интернет-коммуникация как новая речевая формация: коллектив. моногр. / науч. ред. Т.Н. Колокольцева, О.В. Лутовинова. 4-е изд., стер. М.: Флинта, 2018. 328 с.

Ахренова Н.А. Интернет-лингвистика: доминантный подход: моногр. М.: Русайнс, 2022. 178 с.

Crystal D. Language and the Internet. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001. 272 p.

Crystal D. Txtng: The Gr8 Db8. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008. 239 p.

Bolter J.D. Writing Space: Computers, Hypertext, and the Remediation of Print. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 2001. 248 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410600110

Bolter J.D. Examining and Changing the World of Media // Humanistic Perspectives in a Technological World / ed. by R. Utz, V.B. Johnson, Т. Denton. Atlanta: Georgia Tech, 2014. P. 37–39.

Kress G. Multimodality: A Social Semiotic Approach to Contemporary Communication. London: Routledge, 2010. 212 p.

Kress G., van Leeuwen T. Reading Images: The Grammar of Visual Design. London: Routledge, 2020. 310 p.

Brier S. Cybersemiotics: Why Information Is Not Enough. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2008. 544 p. https://doi.org/10.3138/9781442687813

Brier S. Cybersemiotics: A New Foundation for Transdisciplinary Theory of Information, Cognition, Meaningful Communication and the Interaction Between Nature and Culture // Integr. Rev. 2013. Vol. 9, № 2. Р. 220–263. URL: https://integral-review.org/issues/vol_9_no_2_brier_cybersemiotics.pdf (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).

Manovich L. The Language of New Media. Cambridge: MIT Press, 2001. 354 p.

Лотман Ю.М. Семиосфера. СПб.: Искусство-СПБ, 2000. 704 с.

Рольгайзер А.А. Лингвопрагматические особенности франкоязычного интернет-комментария (на примере политической новостной статьи) // Виртуал. коммуникация и соц. сети. 2022. Т. 1, № 3. С. 136–142. https://doi.org/10.21603/2782-4799-2022-1-3-136-142

Сон Л.П. Язык интернет-коммуникации: вторичный глоттогенез и формирование новой символико-семиотической системы // Орг. психолингвистика. 2023. № 3(23). С. 67–79. URL: https://psycholinguistic.ru/arhiv/2023%E2%84%963(23).pdf (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).

Шаев Ю.М. Семиотика смысла в виртуальном пространстве и современные информационные технологии // Соврем. проблемы науки и образования. 2012. № 6. URL: https://science-education.ru/ru/article/view?id=7797 (дата обращения: 05.06.2025).

Galantucci B. Experimental Semiotics: A New Approach for Studying Communication as a Form of Joint Action // Top Cogn. Sci. 2009. Vol. 1, № 2. Р. 393–410. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2009.01027.x

Delliponti A.D., Raia R., Sanguedolce G., Gutowski A., Pleyer M., Sibierska M., Placiński M., Żywiczyński P., Wacewicz S. Experimental Semiotics: A Systematic Categorization of Experimental Studies on the Bootstrapping of Communication Systems // Biosemiotics. 2023. Vol. 16. P. 291–310. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12304-023-09534-x

Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляции: пер. с фр. А. Качалова. М.: Постум, 2018. 318 с.

Leone M. The Semiotics of the Face in Digital Dating: A Research Direction // Digit. Age Semiot. Commun. 2019. Vol. 2. P. 18–40. https://doi.org/10.33919/dasc.19.2.2

Marino G. Cultures of the (Masked) Face // Sign Syst. Stud. 2021. Vol. 49, № 3-4. P. 318–337. https://doi.org/10.12697/SSS.2021.49.3-4.04

Gonçalves K., Erba F., Semadeni F., Demircan H. Ephemeral, Mobile, and Multilingual Signs in Public Space: A Pedagogic Case Study of Stickers // The Handbook of Linguistic Landscapes and Multilingualism / ed. by D. Gorter, J. Cenoz. Newark: John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated, 2025. P. 607–622. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781394231805.ch35

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Kuznetsova И. А. (2026). Study of the Internet Language as a New Semiotic System. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 26(2), 53–63. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V499