AI as an Interlocutor: Philosophy and the Search for New Human Frontiers
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V532Keywords:
AI interlocutor, philosophical anthropology of technology, human frontiers, intersubjectivity, phenomenology of dialogue, concept of the Other, performative subjectivity, ethics of human-machine interactionAbstract
The evolution of artificial intelligence (AI) from a passive tool into an active communicative agent poses a key anthropological question to philosophy: what constitutes the essence of the human when an algorithmic machine lays claim to the role of an interlocutor? The aim of this article is to analyse how the phenomenon of the AI companion transforms the classical philosophical categories of subjectivity and intersubjectivity, leading to a revision of the human frontiers. The methodology is based on a synthesis of a phenomenological description of the experience of dialogue with AI and its hermeneutic interpretation through the concept of the Other of the philosophy of E. Husserl and E. Levinas. As a result, a three-stage dynamic of this process is revealed: the dissolution of the instrumental illusion, the crisis of intersubjective criteria, and the formation of a performative boundary between human and machine. The key finding is the identification of the phenomenon of one-sided intersubjectivity – an asymmetrical dialogue that challenges traditional ethical models and allows for the explication of the content of the “authentically human” category. This dialogue acts as a mirror, revealing the human capacity to create meaning and bear moral responsibility. The scientific novelty lies in bridging the gap between abstract discussions on the essence of artificial intelligence and applied ethical issues. The practical value of the work is manifested in three aspects: it offers a framework for evaluating interface design, contributes to the development of legal norms for AI systems, and points to the need for updating humanities education. The significance of these findings for the Russian context is particularly emphasised, where the development of ethical standards for AI requires consideration of national cultural codes and the philosophical tradition of understanding dialogicality. The article pioneers a new research direction – the study of the human in the age of technology. Its task is to map the interaction between human and machine in the context of digital dialogue.
For citation: Krotenko T.Yu. AI as an Interlocutor: Philosophy and the Search for New Human Frontiers. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2026, vol. 26, no. 4, pp. 106–115. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V532
Downloads
References
Searle J. Minds, Brains, and Science. The 1984 Reith Lectures. Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1984. 107 p.
Тьюринг А. Вычислительные машины и разум / пер. с англ. М., 2018. 128 с.
Dignum V. Responsible Artificial Intelligence: How to Develop and Use AI in a Responsible Way. Cham, 2019. 185 p.
Floridi L. The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence: Principles, Challenges, and Opportunities. Oxford, 2023. 243 p.
Гуссерль Э. Картезианские размышления / пер. с нем. Д.В. Скляднева; вступ. ст. Я.А. Слинина. СПб., 1998. 315 с.
Бубер М. Два образа веры: сб. / пер. с нем.; вступ. ст. Г.С. Померанца. М., 1995. 462 с.
Левинас Э. Избранное: Тотальность и бесконечное / пер. И.С. Вдовиной, Б.В. Дубина. М.; СПб., 2000. 415 с.
Каплан А.Я. Интерфейсы мозг-искусственный интеллект: основания и перспективы // Интеллект. системы. Теория и приложения. 2021. Т. 25, № 4. С. 36–45.
Елхова О.И. Метрики феноменологического виртуального опыта // Вестн. Рос. ун-та дружбы народов. Сер.: Философия. 2024. Т. 28, № 4. С. 997–1013.
Гоббс Т. Левиафан, или Материя, форма и власть государства церковного и гражданского / пер. с англ. А. Гутермана. М., 2021. 800 с.
Лейбниц Г.В. Монадология // Сочинения: [в 4 т.]. Т. 1. М., 1982. С. 413–429.
Декарт Р. Рассуждение о методе, чтобы верно направлять свой разум и отыскивать истину в науках // Сочинения: [в 2 т.]. Т. 1. М., 1989. С. 250–296.
Деррида Ж. О грамматологии. М., 2000. 512 с.
Фуко М. Слова и вещи: Археология гуманитарных наук. СПб., 1994. 405 с.
Sunstein C.R. #Republic: Divided Democracy in the Age of Social Media. Princeton, 2017. 310 p.
Shepard M. Sentient City: Ubiquitous Computing, Architecture, and the Future of Urban Space. N. Y., 2011. 229 p.
Цветкова О.В. Психопатология и искусственный интеллект: пространство бессубъектности? // Филос. антропология. 2023. Т. 9, № 2. С. 137–145.
Черниговская Т.В., Деглин В.Л. Искусственный интеллект и нейронауки: в поисках новой парадигмы сознания // Вестн. С.-Петерб. ун-та. Философия и конфликтология. 2022. Т. 38, № 3. С. 363–377.
Бодрийяр Ж. Симулякры и симуляция. М., 2015. 238 с.
Лекторский В.А., Васильев С.Н., Макаров В.Л. и др. Человек и системы искусственного интеллекта / под ред. акад. РАН В.А. Лекторского. СПб., 2022. 326 с.
Бахтин М.М. К философии поступка // Философия и социология науки и техники: Ежегодник. 1984–1985. М., 1986. С. 80–161.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Krotenko T.Yu.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.