Configuration as a Procedure of Intracultural Knowledge Transfer (Exemplified by the Dynamics of the Concept of Human in the Russian Linguistic Worldview)

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V091

Keywords:

intracultural knowledge transfer, Russian linguistic worldview, knowledge transfer procedures, concept of human, everyday sphere of knowledge, diachronic linguistics

Abstract

Continuous development of technologies and globalization result in transfer of knowledge: knowledge about the world is transmitted between bearers of different linguocultures, as well as from generation to generation within one linguoculture. In the course of various transfer procedures, knowledge undergoes structural and qualitative changes. The nomenclature of possible transfer procedures and the essence of some procedures vary for different types of transfer. Configuration is one of the main procedures for knowledge transfer. Its implementation can be observed through structural changes in the units of knowledge transfer, such as works of art, terms, loanwords, etc. If a concept is considered as such a unit, configuration can be traced in the dynamics of the macrostructure, categorical structure and field description of the concept. Thus, the analysis of linguistic units representing a concept allows us to identify changes occurring in the minds of linguoculture-bearers over time. This paper aimed to study configuration as one of the main procedures of intracultural transfer of knowledge within the Russian worldview, with regard to everyday sphere of knowledge. The material of the research included representations of the concept of human in journalistic publications. The study is based on a complex methodology, including descriptive, comparative historical, and comparative methods, as well as statistical analysis and conceptual analysis. The research allowed us to identify the implementation of the configuration procedure in the course of knowledge transfer in the everyday sphere of knowledge, as well as to confirm its non-identity for the everyday and scientific spheres of knowledge by comparing our results with the data obtained earlier by other researchers. The study contributes to solving the problem of linguocultural transfer of knowledge and can be used in accomplishing many linguocognitive tasks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

О. Ф. Циберная, Chelyabinsk State University

кандидат филологических наук, старший преподаватель кафедры английского языка

References

Демьянков В.З. О когниции, культуре и цивилизации в трансфере знаний // Вопр. когнитив. лингвистики. 2016. № 4(49). С. 5–9.

Новикова Э.Ю. Международный туристический дискурс как лингвокультурный трансфер: моногр. Волгоград: Изд-во ВолГУ, 2017. 332 с.

Циберная О.Ф. Трансфер знаний в китайской языковой картине мира (на примере концепта «человек») // Вестн. Юж.-Урал. гос. ун-та. Сер.: Лингвистика. 2019. Т. 16, № 2. С. 69–73. DOI: 10.14529/ling190210

Циберная О.Ф. Пути и процедуры внутрикультурного трансфера знаний в русской языковой картине мира // Проф. проект: идеи, технологии, результаты. 2019. № 1(34). С. 73–77.

Щедровицкий Г.П. Синтез знаний: проблемы и методы // На пути к теории научного знания. М.: Наука, 1984. C. 67–109.

Автономова Н.С. Познание и перевод. Опыты философии языка. М.: РОССПЭН, 2008. 704 с.

Постовалова В.И. Пути и принципы трансферизации знания в гуманитарных науках // Лингвистика и семиотика культурных трансферов: методы, принципы, технологии: коллект. моногр. / отв. ред. В.В. Фещенко. М.: Культур. революция, 2016. С. 36–60.

Леонтьев А.Н. Деятельность. Сознание. Личность. 2-е изд. М.: Политиздат, 1977. 304 с.

Фурс Л.А. Взаимодействие когнитивного и метакогнитивного уровней в формировании комплексного знания // Вопр. когнитив. лингвистики. 2018. № 2(55). С. 74–78. DOI: 10.20916/1812-3228-2018-2-74-78

Дзюба Е.В. Лингвокогнитивная категоризация в русском языковом сознании: моногр. / Урал. гос. пед. ун-т. Екатеринбург, 2015. 286 с.

Published

2021-04-23

How to Cite

Циберная, О. Ф. (2021). Configuration as a Procedure of Intracultural Knowledge Transfer (Exemplified by the Dynamics of the Concept of Human in the Russian Linguistic Worldview). Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 21(2), 92–98. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V091