Virtuality Index: Philosophical Justification

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V106

Keywords:

virtual reality ontology, virtuality index, immersion, involvement, interactivity, presence, suspension of disbelief

Abstract

This article provides a philosophical justification for the concept of virtuality index (VR Index). The use of the index method is the novelty of this research and allows us to consider virtual reality from a new methodological perspective. In the study, VR Index is schematized: in the author’s opinion, it acts as a certain generalized relative indicator that serves to characterize changes in such a phenomenon as virtual
reality. The basic components of VR Index are distinguished: immersion, involvement, and interactivity. They can be represented in quantitative and qualitative terms. VR Index can be schematically presented in the following way: VR Index = Im·Inv·Int (where Im – immersion, Inv – involvement, Int – interactivity). For each specific case, the above pattern takes the following form: VR Index = Imm·Invn·Intp (where the coefficients m, n, p > 0). Immersion characterizes the coverage of senses of a person in an artificially created environment. Involvement indicates the rational and the emotional components of a person’s mental sphere. Interactivity, in its turn, determines the user’s interaction with the virtual environment. Each of these components affects the value of VR Index. The author distinguishes two extreme cases: virtual realities with low and high VR Index. Virtual realities with low VR Index involve two main channels of human perception, i.e. vision and hearing, are characterized by minimal user involvement and weak interactivity; the users are well aware of the fact that they are interacting with a simulation of the real world. Virtual realities with high VR Index cover a large number of channels of human perception and have a high level of user involvement and interactivity; for the user, the events of the real and virtual worlds become indistinguishable from each other.

For citation: Elkhova O.I. Virtuality Index: Philosophical Justification. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 99–107. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V106

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Оксана Игоревна ЕЛХОВА, Bashkir State University

доктор философских наук, доцент, профессор кафедры философии и политологии

References

Елхова О.И. Подходы к исследованию виртуальной реальности: моногр. Уфа: Гилем, 2008. 100 с.

Елхова О.И. Онтологическое содержание виртуальной реальности: дис. … д-ра филос. наук. Уфа, 2011. 330 с.

Энциклопедия статистических терминов: в 8 т. Т. 1. Методологические основы статистики. М.: Федер. служба гос. статистики, 2011. 183 с.

Chen А. Is Virtual Travel Here to Stay, Even After the Pandemic Subsides? // National Geographic. 2020. 20 April. URL: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/travel/2020/04/can-virtual-reality-replace-real-tourism-duringpandemic-and-beyond/ (дата обращения: 25.01.2021).

Greengard S. Virtual Reality. The MIT Press, 2019. 264 p.

Lanier J. Information Is an Alienated Experience. N. Y.: Basic Books, 2006. 285 p.

Cytowic R.E. Synesthesia. The MIT Press, 2018. 197 p.

Mateer J. Directing for Cinematic Virtual Reality: How the Traditional Film Director’s Craft Applies to Immersive Environments and Notions of Presence // J. Media Pract. 2017. Vol. 18, № 1. Р. 14–25. DOI: 10.1080/14682753.2017.1305838

Bouchard S., St-Jacques J., Robillard G., Renaud P. Anxiety Increases the Feeling of Presence in Virtual Reality // Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 2008. Vol. 17, № 4. Р. 376–391. DOI: 10.1162/pres.17.4.376

Heeter C. Being There: The Subjective Experience of Presence // Presence Teleoper. Virtual Environ. 1992. Vol. 1, № 2. Р. 262–271. DOI: 10.1162/pres.1992.1.2.262

Гумбрехт Х.У. Производство присутствия: чего не может передать значение: пер. с англ. М.: Новое лит. обозрение, 2006. 184 с.

Кольридж С.Т. Избранные труды: пер. с англ. М.: Искусство, 1987. 347 c.

Bennett B. The Normativity of 3D: Cinematic Journeys, “Imperial Visuality”, and Unchained Cameras // Jump Cut. 2013. № 55.

Ross М., Munt A. Cinematic Virtual Reality: Towards the Spatialized Screenplay // J. Screenwriting. 2018. Vol. 9, № 2. Р. 191–209. DOI: 10.1386/josc.9.2.191_1

Published

2021-06-22

How to Cite

ЕЛХОВА, О. И. (2021). Virtuality Index: Philosophical Justification. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 21(3), 99–107. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V106