"Petersburg Is the Most Intentional Town in the World" in the Context of Contemporary Petersburg Mythology
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V193Keywords:
intentional Petersburg, Petersburg mythology, postmodernism, features of postmodern thinking, creation myth, eschatological myth, Peter IAbstract
Petersburg mythology reflects the perception of the city by its residents and their experience of it. This article considers Petersburg mythology as a replica of the “Petersburg text of Russian literature”. The author examines the phenomena characteristic of contemporary Petersburg mythology of the postmodern period: indeterminacy, free quotation, fragmentation, hybridization, “little history”, etc. Further, the paper analyses the meanings that Petersburg dwellers attach to Fyodor Dostoevsky’s famous expression “Petersburg is the most intentional town in the world”. One of the main features of postmodern thinking is manifested in the ideas about St. Petersburg, when various sources – first of all, literary, but also historical and architectural – make up contemporary Petersburg mythology. For this reason, the author chose the structural-typological method: comparing new mythological motifs with archaic and literary ones. Petersburg dwellers assign both positive (something thought out beforehand, an idea, a plan) and negative (something impetuous, a mistake, a crime) to the phrase “intentional Petersburg”. The author analyses the relationship between the concept of intentional town and the main myths of St. Petersburg: the creation myth and the eschatological myth, which are inseparable. Ideas about the intentionality of St. Petersburg are also associated with utopian ideas: creation at the will of an autocrat of an ideal city out of chaos, on swamp, but according to the rules of regular European urban planning. The author concludes that studying the concept of “intentional Petersburg” is relevant at present due to the following: the city’s creation and subsequent existence serve as a potential for an “intentional” impulse for the development of not only St. Petersburg, but of Russia as a whole.
Downloads
References
Лурье Л. Предумышленный город // Лурье Л.Я. Петербург Достоевского. Исторический путеводитель. СПб.: БХВ-Петербург, 2012. С. 6–35.
Топоров В.Н. Петербургский текст. М.: Наука, 2009. 820 с.
Бочаров С.Г. Петербургский пейзаж: камень, вода, человек // Новый мир. 2003. № 10. С. 134–141.
Быстров Н.Л., Полякова И.Г. Петербург как утопия: философско-семиотический этюд // Изв. Урал. гос. ун-та. Сер. 1: Проблемы образования, науки и культуры. 2004. № 29. С. 43–51.
Файбусович Э.Л. Тебе спою задушевную песню свою // География. 2003. № 20. URL: https://geo.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200302003 (дата обращения: 20.02.2022).
Hassan I. The Culture of Postmodernism // Theory Cult. Soc. 1985. Vol. 2, № 3. P. 119–132.
Харви Д. Состояние постмодерна: Исследование истоков культурных изменений. М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экономики, 2021. 576 с.
Кайуа Р. Миф и человек. Человек и сакральное. М.: ОГИ, 2003. 296 с.
Топоров В.Н. Миф. Ритуал. Символ. Образ: Исследования в области мифопоэтического: Избранное. М.: Изд. группа «Прогресс» – «Культура», 1995. 624 с.
Достоевский Ф.М. Записки из подполья // Достоевский Ф.М. Собр. соч.: в 15 т. Т. 4. Л.: Наука. Ленингр. отд-ние, 1989. С. 452–550.
Мазур-Матусевич Е. Петербург как азиатский город // Электрон. филос. журн. Vox / Голос. 2013. Вып. 14. С. 1–18. URL: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/219/223 (дата обращения: 25.03.2022).
Янгфельдт Б. От варягов до Нобеля. Шведы на берегах Невы. М.: Ломоносовъ, 2010. 392 с.
Ожегов С.И. Словарь русского языка. 5-е изд., стер. М.: Гос. изд-во иностр. и нац. словарей, 1963. 900 с.
Топоров В.Н. Хаос первобытный // Мифы народов мира: энцикл.: в 2 т. / гл. ред. С.А. Токарев. М., 1997. Т. 2. К – Я. С. 585–586.
Фуко М. Слова и вещи: Археология гуманитарных наук. СПб.: А-cad: АОЗТ «Талисман», 1994. 405 c.
Логика смысла / Ж. Делез. Theatrum philosophicum / М. Фуко; [к сб. в целом]: пер. с фр. М.: Раритет; Ека- теринбург: Деловая кн., 1998. 480 c.
Брокгауз Ф.А., Ефрон И.А. Энциклопедический словарь. Т. XXXIVА (68): Углерод – Усилие. СПб.: Тип. Акц. О-ва Брокгауз–Ефрон, 1902. 960 с.
Достоевский Ф.М. Подросток // Достоевский Ф.М. Собр. соч.: в 15 т. Т. 8. Л.: Наука. Ленингр. отд-ние, 1990. С. 139–692.
Вежбицкая А. Язык. Культура. Познание. М.: Рус. словари, 1996. 412 с.
References
Lur’e L. Predumyshlennyy gorod [An Intentional Town]. Lur’e L.Ya. Peterburg Dostoevskogo. Istoricheskiy putevoditel’ [Dostoevsky’s Petersburg: A Historical Guide]. St. Petersburg, 2012, pp. 6–35.
Toporov V.N. Peterburgskiy tekst [Petersburg Text]. Moscow, 2009. 820 p.
Bocharov S.G. Peterburgskiy peyzazh: kamen’, voda, chelovek [Petersburg Landscape: Stone, Water, Human]. Novyy mir, 2003, no. 10, pp. 134–141.
Bystrov N.L., Polyakova I.G. Peterburg kak utopiya: filosofsko-semioticheskiy etyud [St. Petersburg as a Utopia: A Philosophical and Semiotic Study]. Izvestiya Ural’skogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta. Ser. 1: Problemy obrazovaniya, nauki i kul’tury, 2004, no. 29, pp. 43–51.
Faybusovich E.L. Tebe spoyu zadushevnuyu pesnyu svoyu [I Will Sing My Heartfelt Song to You]. Geografiya, 2003, no. 20. Available at: https://geo.1sept.ru/article.php?ID=200302003 (accessed: 20 February 2022).
Hassan I. The Culture of Postmodernism. Theory Cult. Soc., 1985, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 119–132.
Harvey D. The Condition of Postmodernity: An Enquiry into the Origins of Cultural Change. Oxford, 1989. 378 p. (Russ. ed.: Kharvi D. Sostoyanie postmoderna: Issledovanie istokov kul’turnykh izmeneniy. Moscow, 2021. 576 p.).
Caillois R. Le Mythe et l’Homme. Paris, 1994. 188 p. (Russ. ed.: Kayua R. Mif i chelovek. Chelovek i sakral’noe. Moscow, 2003. 296 p.).
Toporov V.N. Mif. Ritual. Simvol. Obraz: Issledovaniya v oblasti mifopoeticheskogo [Myth. Ritual. Symbol. Image: Research into the Poetics of Myth]. Moscow, 1995. 624 p.
Dostoevsky F.M. Zapiski iz podpol’ya [Notes from Underground]. Dostoevsky F.M. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 4. Leningrad, 1989, pp. 452–550.
Mazur-Matusevich E. Peterburg kak aziatskiy gorod [St. Petersburg as an Asian City]. Elektronnyy filosovskiy zhurnal. Vox / Golos, 2013, no. 14, pp. 1–18. Available at: https://vox-journal.org/html/issues/219/223 (accessed: 25 March 2022).
Jangfeldt B. Ot varyagov do Nobelya. Shvedy na beregakh Nevy [From Varangians to Nobel: Swedes on the Banks of the Neva River]. Moscow, 2010. 392 p.
Ozhegov S.I. Slovar’ russkogo yazyka [Dictionary of the Russian Language]. Moscow, 1963. 900 p.
Toporov V.N. Khaos pervobytnyy [Primordial Chaos]. Tokarev S.A. (ed.). Mify narodov mira [Myths of the World]. Moscow, 1997. Vol. 2. K – Ya, pp. 585–586.
Foucault M. Les Mots et les choses. Une archéologie des sciences humaines. Paris, 1966, 405 p. (Russ. ed.: Fuko M. Slova i veshchi. Arkheologiya gumanitarnykh nauk. St. Petersburg, 1994. 405 p.
Deleuze G. Logika smysla [The Logic of Sense]. Foucault M. Theatrum philosophicum. Moscow, 1998. 480 p.
Brokgauz F.A., Efron I.A. Entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. T. XXXIVA (68). Uglerod – Usilie [Encyclopaedic Dictionary. Vol. XXXIVA (68). Nitrogen – Effort]. St. Petersburg, 1902. 960 p.
Dostoevsky F.M. Podrostok [The Adolescent]. Dostoevsky F.M. Sobranie sochineniy [Collected Works]. Vol. 8. Leningrad, 1990, pp. 139–692.
Wierzbicka A. Yazyk. Kul’tura. Poznanie [Language. Culture. Cognition]. Moscow, 1996. 412 p.