(Non-)Ancient Man: Philosophical Anthropology of the Young Nietzsche

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V368

Keywords:

overman, total man, proto-man, ancient man, modern man, F. Nietzsche

Abstract

This article analyses the philosophical and anthropological views of Friedrich Nietzsche in the early period of his writing (1869–1873). The paper aims to identify the origin, genesis and transformations of those ideas with which Nietzsche’s philosophy would subsequently be associated: overman, the death of God, and the eternal return. The methodology of the study is based on the fundamental principles and ideas of comparative philosophy as well as historical and philosophical reconstruction. The article focuses on the interpretation of man in young Nietzsche’s philosophy and compares it with the ideas in his later works. The paper argues that his doctrine of the overman is preceded by the idea of considering man within the framework of such concepts as proto-man, total man, total artist and tragic man. Apparently, early Nietzsche’s philosophical and anthropological views were conditioned by two contexts: ancient philosophy and culture of the pre-Socratic period (“the tragic era”) on the one hand, and A. Schopenhauer’s metaphysics and the aesthetics in R. Wagner’s works on the other. The article substantiates the thesis that the determining factors in the genesis of young Nietzsche’s ideas were the assimilation and rethinking of Schopenhauer’s and Wagner’s views. Schopenhauer’s metaphysics and Wagner’s aesthetics act as the starting point and a conceptual horizon for the reception of the “tragic era” of antiquity, not vice versa. In addition, the paper emphasizes that to understand the crisis of European metaphysics Nietzsche turned to the philosophical reception of antiquity. A parallel is drawn between Nietzsche’s interpretations of the crisis of ancient culture and the crisis of modern Christian culture.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Vyacheslav T. Faritov, Samara State Technical University

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Prof. at the Department of Philosophy

References

Глухов А.А. Перехлест волны. Политическая логика Платона и постницшеанское преодоление платонизма. М.: Изд. дом Высш. шк. экономики, 2014. 584 с.

Малкина С.М. Постметафизические конфигурации онтологии. Саратов: Изд-во Сарат. ун-та, 2015. 268 с.

Фаритов В.Т. Онтология трансгрессии: Г.В.Ф. Гегель и Ф. Ницше у истоков новой философской парадигмы. СПб.: Алетейя, 2017. 442 с.

Колесников И.Д. Фридрих Ницше и античность: Образ классической древности в немецкой гуманитарной мысли XVIII–XX веков. М.: Культур. революция, 2020. 432 с.

Колесников И.Д. Пайдейя Ницше и античность // Философия в условиях социокультурного многообразия: от экспертного знания до мировоззренческих ориентиров: сб. материалов Всерос. конф., посвящ. 100-летию гуманит. образования в Саратове / под ред. проф., д-ра филос. наук М.О. Орлова. Саратов: ИЦ «Наука», 2017. С. 217–223.

Колесников И.Д. «Вечное возвращение» Ницше и античность // Вестн. Перм. ун-та. Философия. Психология. Социология. 2018. Вып. 2. С. 236–242. https://doi.org/10.17072/2078-7898/2018-2-236-242

Ясперс К. Ницше: Введение в понимание его философствования / пер. с нем. Ю. Медведева; под ред. М. Ермаковой. СПб.: Фонд Ун-т: Владимир Даль, 2004. 630 с.

Гек М. Рихард Вагнер: Жизнь. Творчество. Интерпретации. М.: Культур. революция, 2017. 424 с.

Вагнер Р. Опера и драма. М.: РИПОЛ Классик, 2022. 386 с.

Левит К. Ницшевская философия вечного возвращения того же / пер. с нем. В. Бакусева. М.: Культур. революция, 2016. 336 с.

Published

2024-10-01

How to Cite

Faritov В. Т. (2024). (Non-)Ancient Man: Philosophical Anthropology of the Young Nietzsche. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 24(4), 129–139. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V368