Directions of Solidarization in the Crisis Discourse of Belarusian Regional Press During the Coronavirus Pandemic

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V072

Keywords:

media discourse, crisis discourse, regional press in Belarus, solidarity, solidarization, integration strategy, orientation strategy, neutralization strategy

Abstract

The paper discusses the directions of solidarity formation, as well as the linguistic means of its explication in the press during the coronavirus pandemic crisis. This work is based on the articles of Belarusian regional newspapers published in March–June 2020. The current situation is a global crisis that has a significant impact on the lives of people around the world; therefore its coverage in the media is extremely important. It was determined here that the main strategies for presenting the situation in the media include orientation (formulation and clarification of the crisis), neutralization (easing the tension in the society) and integration (promoting solidarity among the population during the crisis). The analysis of Belarusian regional press revealed four vectors of solidarization: social support of vulnerable categories of people (senior citizens, the disabled) by public service institutions, various organizations and volunteers; people’s personal and collective responsibility for their own health and safety of others, demonstration of responsible behaviour; institutional, mainly financial, assistance in combating the epidemic, including support to other countries; common values and the consolidation of efforts to achieve socially significant goals. Key lexemes were identified that accentuate these ideas in the publications of the regional press. The author comes to the conclusion that in a crisis situation mass media strengthens its role as a means of maintaining balance in the society and mobilizing the population in order to accomplish important tasks.
For citation: Biyumena A.A. Directions of Solidarization in the Crisis Discourse of Belarusian Regional Press During the Coronavirus Pandemic. Vestnik Severnogo (Arkticheskogo) federal’nogo universiteta. Ser.: Gumanitarnye i sotsial’nye nauki, 2021, no. 1, pp. 33–40. DOI: 10.37482/2687-1505-V072

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Анна Александровна БИЮМЕНА, Мinsk State Linguistic University

кандидат филологических наук, доцент, доцент кафедры речеведения и теории коммуникации
Адрес: 220034, Республика Беларусь, г. Минск, ул. Захарова, д. 21

References

Пильгун Е.В. Семантика и прагматика кризисного дискурса: дис. … канд. филол. наук. Минск, 2019. 185 с.

Багрова Е.В. Типологизация кризисов современного социального бытия // Вестн. Омск. гос. пед. ун-та. Гуманит. исслед. 2019. № 1(22). С. 9–12.

Lerbinger O. The Crisis Manager: Facing Risk and Responsibility. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, 1997. 384 p.

Newsom D., Scott A., Turk J.V. This Is PR: The Realities of Public Relations. 5th ed. Belmont: Wadsworth Publ. Co., 1992. 615 p.

Kołtan J. Afterword: What Solidarity of the Future? // Solidarity and the Crisis of Trust / ed. by J. Kołtan. Gdansk: European Solidarity Centre, 2016. P. 133–143.

Хуэйцинь Чж. Риторический подход к изучению имиджа страны в дискурсе политического кризиса // Медиариторика и современная культура общения: наука-практика-обучение: сб. ст. XXII Междунар. науч. конф. (Москва, 30 января – 1 февраля 2019 г.) / отв. ред. В.И. Аннушкин. М.: Гос. ин-т рус. яз. им. А.С. Пушкина, 2019. С. 228–233.

Шейгал Е.И. Семиотика политического дискурса. М.: Гнозис, 2004. 326 с.

Пильгун Е.В. Интенциональность и коммуникативные тактики дискурса кризисных ситуаций // Часоп. Беларус. дзярж. ун-та. Філалогія. 2017. № 2. С. 92–95.

Ефремова Т.Ф. Современный толковый словарь русского языка: в 3 т.: ок. 160 000 слов. М.: АСТ: Астрель, 2006. Т. 2: М–П. 1160 с.

Бойцова О.Ю. К вопросу о «негативной солидарности» как концепте политической философии // Вестн. Моск. ун-та. Сер. 7: Философия. 2018. № 4. С. 60–69.

Tzimas T. Solidarity as a Principle of International Law: Its Application in Consensual Intervention // GroJIL. 2018. Vol. 6, № 2. Р. 333–359. DOI: 10.21827/5bf3ea340e002

Taylor A. Solidarity: Obligations and Expressions. URL: http://www.socialpolicy.ed.ac.uk/__data/assets/pdf_file/0012/141330/JWI_Solidarity_Obligations_and_Expressions.pdf (дата обращения: 06.06.2020).

Шкудунова Ю.В. Экспликация понятий «солидарность» и «солидаризация» // Фундам. исслед. 2015. № 2 (ч. 18). С. 4118–4122.

Шмелева Т.В. Ключевые слова текущего момента // Сollegium. 1993. № 1. С. 33–41.

Published

2021-03-04

How to Cite

БИЮМЕНА, А. А. (2021). Directions of Solidarization in the Crisis Discourse of Belarusian Regional Press During the Coronavirus Pandemic. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 21(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V072