New Axial Age: Is It Really the Case?

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V464

Keywords:

new Axial Age, rhythmic cascade method, techno-humanitarian imbalance, big anthropological shift, integral ethics of the human community, supra-confessional religiosity, transcendence, new axial man

Abstract

This article attempts to analyse and characterize the thirty-year trend of scholars’ returning to Karl Jaspers’ concept of the Axial Age, but in its new semantic configurations. The paper studies the most significant Russian and foreign sources on this topic, identifying contemporary interpretations of Jaspers’ original concept regarding the unity of humanity’s spiritual and historical origins. Two methodological approaches to this problem were proposed: a comparative phenomenological and a rhythmic cascade (V.G. Budanov’s term) approach. While identifying the specificity of the current spiritual and historical situation, the author discussed the existential challenges that the contemporary limit situation of global uncertainty poses to the humanity, particularly from the perspective of the hypothesis of techno-humanitarian imbalance. This hypothesis was expanded with the idea that a perfect correlation between the levels of technological development and psychological maturity of humankind can be achieved by applying the golden ratio, including in its dynamic-evolutionary aspect in the form of the Fibonacci sequence. Based on the developmental trajectory of artificial intelligence, some qualitative indicators were proposed to assess the imbalance. It is concluded that the human being capable of managing the available level of modern technologies is still in formation. His emergence is linked with the necessity of an integral ethics of life rooted in human experience and encompassing a multiplicity of confessions. In the limit situation of digitalization and exponential development of artificial intelligence, humanity is faced with the ultimate questions of what humans are like as spiritual and moral beings. The author concluded by pointing out the need to recognize the acuteness of the current existential-historical situation that raises the question of a new human ontology, realized in the diverse forms of a person’s inner experience that can only be copied by a machine in a purely mechanistic way.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Kirill S. Golikov, Institute of Philosophy, Russian Academy of Sciences

Cand. Sci. (Philos.), Junior Researcher, Department of Interdisciplinary Problems of Scientific and Technological Development

References

Cousins E.H. Christ of the 21st Century. N. Y.: Continuum, 1998. 224 p.

Wright M. The Second Axial Emergence // Center for Christogenesis. 2016. 26 Sept. URL: https://christogenesis.org/second-axial-emergence (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

Gardels N. The New Axial Age // Noema. 2020. 17 June. URL: https://www.noemamag.com/the-new-axial-age (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

Vermander B. The «Axial Age» and the Invention of a Shared Future // La Civiltà Cattolica. 2021. 5 Oct. URL: https://www.laciviltacattolica.com/the-axial-age-and-the-invention-of-a-shared-future/ (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

Bellah R.N., Joas H. The Axial Age and Its Consequences. Cambridge: Harvard Univ. Press, 2012. 500 p. https://doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674067400

Stout B. Welcome to the 2nd Axial Age: Toward the Next Evolution in Human Consciousness. 2019. 13 Aug. URL: https://citizenstout.substack.com/p/welcome-to-the-2nd-axial-age (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

Marshall P. A Complex Integral Realist Perspective: Towards a New Axial Vision. London: Routledge, 2016. 296 p. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315753485

Hagemann R. A Technological Axial Age // Niskanen Center. 2016. 20 May. URL: https://www.niskanencenter.org/a-technological-axial-age (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

История Востока: в 6 т. / Рос. акад. наук, Ин-т востоковедения. Т. 1. Восток в древности / отв. ред. В.А. Якобсон. М.: Вост. лит., 2002. 688 с.

Сафонов А.Л. Осевое время-2: возвращение к истокам или погружение во тьму? // Вестн. БГУ. 2012. No 14. С. 34–42.

Стерледева Т.Д., Стерледев Р.К. Осевое время-2 в аспекте электронной виртуальной реальности // Манускрипт. 2020. No 1. С. 99–103. https://doi.org/10.30853/manuscript.2020.1.20

Бирич И.А. Новое осевое время и новый осевой человек как ответ на вызов антропной Вселенной // Синергетика. 2025. 19 янв. URL: https://spkurdyumov.ru/philosophy/16361 (дата обращения: 06.04.2025).

Ясперс К. Смысл и назначение истории: пер. с нем. М.: Республика, 1994. 527 c.

Буданов В.Г. Архетипическое эхо в истории: метод ритмокаскадов и природа Большого антропологического перехода // Сложность. Разум. Постнеклассика. 2020. No 4. С. 34–44. https://doi.org/10.12737/2306-174X-2021-34-45

Буданов В.Г., Аршинов В.И. Большой антропологический переход: методология сложностно-сетевого мышления: моногр. Курск: Унив. кн., 2022. 129 с.

Буданов В.Г., Аршинов В.И., Баева А.В., Белоногов И.Н., Белялетдинов Р.Р., Герасимова И.А., Лепский В.Е., Попова О.В., Пронин М.А., Раев О.Н., Розин В.М., Свирский Я.И., Струговщикова У.С., Тищенко П.Д., Шевченко С.Ю. Современные проблемы социо-техно-антропосферы: коллектив. моногр. / отв. ред. В.Г. Буданов. Курск: Унив. кн., 2022. 255 с.

Назаретян А.П. Воспитательный потенциал синергетики: гипотеза техно-гуманитарного баланса // Науч. результат. Педагогика и психология образования. 2014. No 2. С. 98–105. URL: https://rrpedagogy.ru/journal/annotation/747/ (дата обращения: 03.04.2025).

Джеймс У. Многообразие религиозного опыта: пер. с англ. М.: Акад. проект, 2017. 415 с.

Голиков К.С. Требуем ли мы перемен? Обращение к метафоре «раковины» Карла Ясперса // Идеи и идеалы. 2020. No 2-1. С. 96–107. https://doi.org/10.17212/2075-0862-2020-12.2.1-96-107

Бубер М. Проблема человека // Бубер М. Два образа веры: сб. / под ред. П.С. Гуревича, С.Я. Левит, С.В. Лезова. М.: Республика, 1995. С. 157–232.

Published

2025-11-05

How to Cite

Golikov К. С. (2025). New Axial Age: Is It Really the Case?. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 25(5), 98–107. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V464