Approaches to Studying the Phenomenon of Cultural Heritage and Its Impact on International Relations

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V506

Keywords:

cultural heritage, international cultural cooperation, cultural identity, cultural heritage sites, intangible heritage, UNESCO, international relations theories, intercultural dialogue

Abstract

The article dwells on the theoretical understanding of key concepts underlying modern research in culture and international relations. In the context of escalating geopolitical contradictions and the growing importance of soft power, the issues of preserving cultural identity and facilitating intercultural dialogue are becoming particularly relevant. The paper aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of approaches to defining the essence and structure of cultural heritage as well as to investigate the phenomenon of international cultural cooperation as a tool for interaction on the global stage. The scientific significance of the research lies in the systematization of a wide range of theoretical perspectives – from philosophical and culturological to legal and politological – which allows us to present a holistic picture of the phenomena under study. The methodological framework is based on an analysis of scientific literature, a comparative legal method and elements of an interdisciplinary approach, which made it possible to synthesize the provisions of national and international documents and propositions of Russian and foreign researchers. The paper presents the authors’ definition of cultural heritage as a dynamic system of tangible and intangible values ensuring the connection between generations. A multicomponent structure of heritage, encompassing various typologies (by object composition, level of significance, functional use, etc.), was identified. The evolution of approaches to international cooperation was analysed in the context of the main theories of international relations (realism, Marxism, neoliberalism), and the types and forms of cultural interaction were systematized. The value of the article lies in the integration of two problem fields, creating a theoretical basis for further study into the role of cultural heritage as a resource for international cooperation. The conclusions and classifications presented can have practical significance for specialists in the fields of cultural policy, international relations, and cultural heritage preservation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Konstantin S. Zaikov, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Hist.), Assoc. Prof., Head of the Department of Regional Studies, International Relations and Political Sciences

Nikolay M. Terebikhin, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Prof., Prof. at the Department of Cultural and Religious Studies

Aleksandr E. Shaparov, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Polit.), Prof., Prof. at the Department of Regional Studies, International Relations and Political Sciences

Artem V. Makulin, Northern (Arctic) Federal University named after M.V. Lomonosov, Arkhangelsk, Russia

Dr. Sci. (Philos.), Assoc. Prof., Prof. at the Philosophy and Sociology Department

References

Bendix R.F. Life Itself: An Essay on the Sensory and the (Potential) End of Heritage Making // Traditiones. 2022. Vol. 50, № 1. P. 43–51. https://doi.org/10.3986/Traditio2021500104

Лоуэнталь Д. Прошлое – чужая страна. СПб.: Владимир Даль, 2004. 624 с.

Smith L. All Heritage Is Intangible: Critical Heritage Studies and Museums. Amsterdam: Reinwardt Academy. 2012. 48 p. URL: https://www.ahk.nl/fileadmin/download/reinwardt/lectoraat/All_heritage_is_intangible.pdf (дата обращения: 05.04.2025).

Киршенблат-Гимблет Б. Нематериальное наследие как метакультурное производство // Вопр. музеологии. 2013. № 2(8). С. 3–16.

Hafstein V.T., Skrydstrup M. Heritage vs. Property: Contrasting Regimes and Rationalities in the Patrimonial Field // The Routledge Companion to Cultural Property / ed. by J. Anderson, H. Geismar. Routledge, 2017. P. 38–53.

Лихачев Д.С. Память преодолевает время // Наше наследие. 1988. № 1. С. 1–4.

Замятин Д.Н. Образ наследия в культуре. Методологические подходы к изучению понятия наследия // Социол. исследования. 2010. № 2(310). С. 75–82.

Петрова И.А., Кибасова Г.П., Назаров А.А. Культурно-историческое наследие: современные трактовки понятия // Электрон. науч.-образоват. журн. ВГПУ «Грани познания». 2010. № 4 (9). URL: http://grani.vspu.ru/files/publics/202_st.pdf (дата обращения: 05.04.2025).

Веденин Ю.А. Базовые принципы культурно-ландшафтного подхода к изучению и сохранению наследия // Наследие и современность. 2020. Т. 3, № 2. С. 7–20.

Мастеница Е.Н. Культурное наследие в современном мире: концептуализация понятия и проблематики // Тр. С.-Петерб. гос. ун-та культуры и искусств. 2008. Т. 180. С. 252–262.

Шнирельман В.А. Археология, культурное наследие, вандализм и вооруженные конфликты // Вестн. Томск. гос. ун-та. История. 2020. № 68. C. 79–88. https://doi.org/10.17223/19988613/68/11

Лихачев Д.С. Декларация прав культуры // Культурное наследие российского государства: сб. ст. СПб.: ИПК «Вести». 1998. C. 20–23.

Квартальнов В.А. Туризм, экскурсии, обмены: современная практика. М.: Наука, 1993. 416 с.

Медведева Н.В., Стоналова А.С. Понятие «культурное наследие» и основные теоретические подходы к его изучению // Материалы Афанасьев. чтений. 2016. № 3(16). С. 138–143.

Кравченко А.В. Природное окружение объекта Всемирного наследия ЮНЕСКО «Петроглифы Онежского озера и Белого моря»: сосудистые растения // Тр. КарНЦ РАН. 2021. № 4. С. 31–45.

Bogolyubova N., Nikolaeva Yu., Portnyagina M., Elts E. International Cooperation in the Arctic as a Way to Preserve the Natural and Cultural Heritage // IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019. Vol. 302. Art. № 012054. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/302/1/012054

Янович М.В. Правовая охрана культурного наследия Арктики // Вестн. Сев. (Арктич.) федер. ун-та. Сер.: Гуманит. и соц. науки. 2014. № 4. С. 120–126.

Александров А.А. Международное культурное сотрудничество: государственная стратегия Российской Федерации // Право и управление. XXI век. 2010. № 4(17). С. 70–72.

Головина Г.В., Савина И.А. Международное культурное сотрудничество: аспекты социально-культурного и правового регулирования // Вестн. Адыг. гос. ун-та. Сер.: Регионоведение: философия, история, социология, юриспруденция, политология, культурология. 2014. № 4(148). C. 162–169.

Published

2026-04-22

How to Cite

Zaikov К. С., Terebikhin Н. М., Shaparov А. Е., & Makulin А. В. (2026). Approaches to Studying the Phenomenon of Cultural Heritage and Its Impact on International Relations. Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University Series "Humanitarian and Social Sciences", 26(2), 133–144. https://doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-V506